9 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 1896–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ware v. Stategreen2 sentences1926The burden in the whole case is upon the State to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant was present and committed the offense as alleged in the indictment. ’ ’ The subject-matter of this instruction was fully covered by instruction No. 6, which the court gave in the language of an instruction approved by this court on the defense of alibi in Ware v. State, 59 Ark. 379, 386, 392 , 27 S. W. 485 , and many subsequent cases. 1926The burden in the whole case is upon the State to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant was present and committed the offense as alleged in the indictment. ’ ’ The subject-matter of this instruction was fully covered by instruction No. 6, which the court gave in the language of an instruction approved by this court on the defense of alibi in Ware v. State, 59 Ark. 379, 386, 392 , 27 S. W. 485 , and many subsequent cases. | 1 | 1 |
Lilly v. Robinson Mercantile Co.green1 sentence1917See Lilly v. Robinson Mercantile Co., 106 Ark. 571 , and cases there cited. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
The People v. . Buddensieck
neutral
2 sentences1923People v. Buddensieck, 103 N. Y. 487 .” See also Zinn and Cheney v. State, 135 Ark. 342 . 1909People v. Buddensieck, 103 N. Y. 487 . | 2 | 1909–1923 |
Brown v. State
green
2 sentences1915Brown v. State, 55 Ark. 593 ; Muldowney v. Illinois Cent. 1896Brown v. State, 55 Ark. 593 ; Muldowney v. Illinois Central R. | 2 | 1896–1915 |
Ragland v. Miller Trane Service Agency, Inc.
green
2 sentences1996The merits of the claim Arkansas Code Ann. § 26-52-301 (Supp. 1995) provides in part: There is levied an excise tax of three percent (3%) upon the gross proceeds or gross receipts derived from all sales to any person of the following: * * * (C)(i) Service of alteration, addition, cleaning, refinishing, replacement, and repair of motor vehicles, aircraft, farm machinery and implements, motors of all kinds, tires and batteries, boats, electrical appliances and devices, furniture, rugs, upholstery, household appliances, television and radio, jewelry, watches and clocks, engineering instruments, m 1996The merits of the claim Arkansas Code Ann. § 26-52-301 (Supp. 1995) provides in part: There is levied an excise tax of three percent (3%) upon the gross proceeds or gross receipts derived from all sales to any person of the following: * * * (C)(i) Service of alteration, addition, cleaning, refinishing, replacement, and repair of motor vehicles, aircraft, farm machinery and implements, motors of all kinds, tires and batteries, boats, electrical appliances and devices, furniture, rugs, upholstery, household appliances, television and radio, jewelry, watches and clocks, engineering instruments, m | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Walker v. State
green
2 sentences1992Walker v. State, 308 Ark. 498 , 825 S.W.2d 822 (1992); McKinney v. City of Eldorado, 308 Ark. 284 , 824 S.W.2d 826 (1992). 1992Walker v. State, 308 Ark. 498 , 825 S.W.2d 822 (1992); McKinney v. City of Eldorado, 308 Ark. 284 , 824 S.W.2d 826 (1992). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
McKinney v. City of El Dorado
green
2 sentences1992Walker v. State, 308 Ark. 498 , 825 S.W.2d 822 (1992); McKinney v. City of Eldorado, 308 Ark. 284 , 824 S.W.2d 826 (1992). 1992Walker v. State, 308 Ark. 498 , 825 S.W.2d 822 (1992); McKinney v. City of Eldorado, 308 Ark. 284 , 824 S.W.2d 826 (1992). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Valley Oil Co. v. Ready
neutral
2 sentences1930In Valley Oil Co. v. Ready, 131 Ark. 531 , 199 S. W. 915 , it is said: “This court, trying the cause de novo, may apply fio the facts proved its own general knowledge of the subject-matter of inquiry in determining the value of the services that were rendered by the attorneys.” Lilly v. Robinson Mercantile Co., supra. In Sain v. Bogle, 122 Ark. 14 , 182 S. W. 515 , it was held that, in determining- what is a reasonable fee for an attorney, “it is competent and proper to consider the amount and character of the services rendered, the labor, time and trouble involved, the nature and importance o 1930In Valley Oil Co. v. Ready, 131 Ark. 531 , 199 S. W. 915 , it is said: “This court, trying the cause de novo, may apply fio the facts proved its own general knowledge of the subject-matter of inquiry in determining the value of the services that were rendered by the attorneys.” Lilly v. Robinson Mercantile Co., supra. In Sain v. Bogle, 122 Ark. 14 , 182 S. W. 515 , it was held that, in determining- what is a reasonable fee for an attorney, “it is competent and proper to consider the amount and character of the services rendered, the labor, time and trouble involved, the nature and importance o | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Sain v. Bogle
green
2 sentences1930In Valley Oil Co. v. Ready, 131 Ark. 531 , 199 S. W. 915 , it is said: “This court, trying the cause de novo, may apply fio the facts proved its own general knowledge of the subject-matter of inquiry in determining the value of the services that were rendered by the attorneys.” Lilly v. Robinson Mercantile Co., supra. In Sain v. Bogle, 122 Ark. 14 , 182 S. W. 515 , it was held that, in determining- what is a reasonable fee for an attorney, “it is competent and proper to consider the amount and character of the services rendered, the labor, time and trouble involved, the nature and importance o 1930In Valley Oil Co. v. Ready, 131 Ark. 531 , 199 S. W. 915 , it is said: “This court, trying the cause de novo, may apply fio the facts proved its own general knowledge of the subject-matter of inquiry in determining the value of the services that were rendered by the attorneys.” Lilly v. Robinson Mercantile Co., supra. In Sain v. Bogle, 122 Ark. 14 , 182 S. W. 515 , it was held that, in determining- what is a reasonable fee for an attorney, “it is competent and proper to consider the amount and character of the services rendered, the labor, time and trouble involved, the nature and importance o | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Zinn v. State
green
1 sentence1923People v. Buddensieck, 103 N. Y. 487 .” See also Zinn and Cheney v. State, 135 Ark. 342 . | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.