Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1937–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Garciagreen2 sentences2013See State v. Garcia, 2002-NMCA-050, ¶ 12 , 132 2 N.M. 180 , 45 P.3d 900 (rejecting an interpretation of a rule that would render part of 3 the rule meaningless). 4 {4} With respect to Section 40-4-20, that statute permits the re-opening of a divorce 5 case where there remains undivided community property. 2013See State v. Garcia, 2002-NMCA-050, ¶ 12 , 132 2 N.M. 180 , 45 P.3d 900 (rejecting an interpretation of a rule that would render part of 3 the rule meaningless). 4 {4} With respect to Section 40-4-20, that statute permits the re-opening of a divorce 5 case where there remains undivided community property. | 1 | 1 |
Madrid v. Village of Chamagreen1 sentence2013See State v. Garcia, 2002-NMCA-050, ¶ 12 , 132 2 N.M. 180 , 45 P.3d 900 (rejecting an interpretation of a rule that would render part of 3 the rule meaningless). 4 {4} With respect to Section 40-4-20, that statute permits the re-opening of a divorce 5 case where there remains undivided community property. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ramirezgreen2 sentences1985See e.g., State v. Ramirez, 79 N.M. 475 , 444 P.2d 986 (1968); State v. Zarafonetis, 81 N.M. 674 , 472 P.2d 388 (Ct.App.1970); State v. McFerran, 80 N.M. 622 , 459 P.2d 148 (Ct.App.1969). 1985See e.g., State v. Ramirez, 79 N.M. 475 , 444 P.2d 986 (1968); State v. Zarafonetis, 81 N.M. 674 , 472 P.2d 388 (Ct.App.1970); State v. McFerran, 80 N.M. 622 , 459 P.2d 148 (Ct.App.1969). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Middletongreen1 sentence1984State v. Ballinger, 99 N.M. at 712 , 668 P.2d at 371. | 1 | 1 |
Fond Du Lac Plaza, Inc. v. Reidgreen1 sentence1980Cf. United States v. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., supra, 18 F.R.Serv.2d at 319 (“The proposition that an adverse litigant may not unilaterally determine the scope of discovery needs no citation”); Fond Du Lac Plaza, Inc. v. Reid, 47 F.R.D. 221, 222 (E.D.Wis. 1969) (“It is inappropriate for the party to determine on his own that the subject matter of the inquiry is ‘premature’; thus, it was the plaintiff’s responsibility in this case to answer the interrogatories or to seek relief from the court”). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Jenningsgreen2 sentences1937See People v. Jennings, 252 Ill. 534 , 96 N.E. 1077 , 43 L.R.A.(N.S.) 1206. 1937See People v. Jennings, 252 Ill. 534 , 96 N.E. 1077 , 43 L.R.A.(N.S.) 1206. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lynch v. Grayson
green
2 sentences1993Lynch v. Grayson, 5 N.M. 487, 502 , 25 P. 992 , 996 (1891) (citations omitted). [9] It is not necessary to set out in detail an explanation of PTSD or RTS here. 1993Lynch v. Grayson, 5 N.M. 487, 502 , 25 P. 992 , 996 (1891) (citations omitted). . | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Frei v. Brownlee
green
2 sentences1958In support of their first point, appellant’s counsel place great reliance on our decision in Frei v. Brownlee, 56 N.M. 677 , 248 P. 2d 671 , as well as several other New Mexico cases used arguendo, as well as decisions of other sister states. 1958In support of their first point, appellant’s counsel place great reliance on our decision in Frei v. Brownlee, 56 N.M. 677 , 248 P. 2d 671 , as well as several other New Mexico cases used arguendo, as well as decisions of other sister states. | 2 | 1958–1958 |
State v. Zarafonetis
green
2 sentences1985See e.g., State v. Ramirez, 79 N.M. 475 , 444 P.2d 986 (1968); State v. Zarafonetis, 81 N.M. 674 , 472 P.2d 388 (Ct.App.1970); State v. McFerran, 80 N.M. 622 , 459 P.2d 148 (Ct.App.1969). 1985See e.g., State v. Ramirez, 79 N.M. 475 , 444 P.2d 986 (1968); State v. Zarafonetis, 81 N.M. 674 , 472 P.2d 388 (Ct.App.1970); State v. McFerran, 80 N.M. 622 , 459 P.2d 148 (Ct.App.1969). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. McFerran
green
2 sentences1985See e.g., State v. Ramirez, 79 N.M. 475 , 444 P.2d 986 (1968); State v. Zarafonetis, 81 N.M. 674 , 472 P.2d 388 (Ct.App.1970); State v. McFerran, 80 N.M. 622 , 459 P.2d 148 (Ct.App.1969). 1985See e.g., State v. Ramirez, 79 N.M. 475 , 444 P.2d 986 (1968); State v. Zarafonetis, 81 N.M. 674 , 472 P.2d 388 (Ct.App.1970); State v. McFerran, 80 N.M. 622 , 459 P.2d 148 (Ct.App.1969). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Ballinger
green
1 sentence1984State v. Ballinger, 99 N.M. at 712 , 668 P.2d at 371. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.