Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
9 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1946–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dennis v. Jordangreen2 sentences2018See Dennis v. Jordan , 71 Ariz. 430 , 439, 229 P.2d 692 (1951) (stating "it is not necessary that the title be a synopsis or a complete index of the legislation that is to follow" but suffices if it "indicate[s], in a general way at least, what is to follow in the way of legislation" and "put[s] anyone having an interest in the subject matter on inquiry" (emphasis removed) (internal quotations omitted) ). 2018See Dennis v. Jordan , 71 Ariz. 430 , 439, 229 P.2d 692 (1951) (stating "it is not necessary that the title be a synopsis or a complete index of the legislation that is to follow" but suffices if it "indicate[s], in a general way at least, what is to follow in the way of legislation" and "put[s] anyone having an interest in the subject matter on inquiry" (emphasis removed) (internal quotations omitted) ). | 1 | 1 |
Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Honorable Bernard M. Decker, United States District Judgegreen2 sentences1993As articulated in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Decker, 423 F.2d 487 (7th Cir.1970), aff'd by an equally divided court, 400 U.S. 348 , 91 S.Ct. 479 , 27 L.Ed.2d 433 (1971), it focuses on the nature of the communication — not the status of the communicator. 1993See Harper & Row, 423 F.2d at 491-92 ; Diversified Industries, Inc. v. Meredith, 572 F.2d 596, 609 (8th Cir.1977); Jack B. | 1 | 1 |
Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missourigreen1 sentence1993See Harper & Row, 423 F.2d at 491-92 ; Diversified Industries, Inc. v. Meredith, 572 F.2d 596, 609 (8th Cir.1977); Jack B. | 1 | 1 |
Upjohn Co. v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1993Chief Justice Burger wrote a concurring opinion eschewing the majority’s extremely fact-specific approach and distilling from the case a narrowing of the subject matter test to that conduct of an employee which could bind the corporation. 449 U.S. at 403 , 101 S.Ct. at 689 (Burger, C.J., concurring.) Instead of applying a narrower version of the subject matter test, the court of appeals below adopted a broad version for communications of non-control group employees, but then, because of the concerns we have already expressed, made it qualified. | 1 | 1 |
Merchants Nat. Bk. v. EJ & E. RY. CO.green2 sentences1979See Merchant’s National Bank of Aurora v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co., 49 Ill.2d 118 , 273 N.E.2d 809 (1971); Southern Pacific Co. v. Watkins, 83 Nev. 471 , 435 P.2d 498 (1967). 6 But we are more persuaded by *571 Chief Justice Underwood’s dissent in Merchant’s National Bank of Aurora v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company, supra, wherein he said: “ ‘The subject matter of inquiry here is not of such a character that only persons of skill and experience in it are capable of forming a correct judgment about it. 1979See Merchant’s National Bank of Aurora v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co., 49 Ill.2d 118 , 273 N.E.2d 809 (1971); Southern Pacific Co. v. Watkins, 83 Nev. 471 , 435 P.2d 498 (1967). 6 But we are more persuaded by *571 Chief Justice Underwood’s dissent in Merchant’s National Bank of Aurora v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company, supra, wherein he said: “ ‘The subject matter of inquiry here is not of such a character that only persons of skill and experience in it are capable of forming a correct judgment about it. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Lewkowitz
green
2 sentences1977In re Lewkowitz, 70 Ariz. 325 , 220 P.2d 229 (1950), expressed the test to determine the sufficiency of a title as follows: ‘It has therefore been held that the title is sufficient if it is not productive of surprise and fraud, and is not calculated to mislead the legislature or the people, but is of such character as fairly to apprise legislators, and the public in general, of the subject matter of the legislation, and of the interests that are or may be affected thereby, and to put anyone having an interest in the subject matter on inquiry.’ 50 Am.Jur., Statutes, § 167. 1977In re Lewkowitz, 70 Ariz. 325 , 220 P.2d 229 (1950), expressed the test to determine the sufficiency of a title as follows: ‘It has therefore been held that the title is sufficient if it is not productive of surprise and fraud, and is not calculated to mislead the legislature or the people, but is of such character as fairly to apprise legislators, and the public in general, of the subject matter of the legislation, and of the interests that are or may be affected thereby, and to put anyone having an interest in the subject matter on inquiry.’ 50 Am.Jur., Statutes, § 167. | 3 | 1956–1977 |
Bernard M. Decker, United States District Judge v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.
green
2 sentences1993As articulated in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Decker, 423 F.2d 487 (7th Cir.1970), aff'd by an equally divided court, 400 U.S. 348 , 91 S.Ct. 479 , 27 L.Ed.2d 433 (1971), it focuses on the nature of the communication — not the status of the communicator. 1993As articulated in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Decker, 423 F.2d 487 (7th Cir.1970), aff'd by an equally divided court, 400 U.S. 348 , 91 S.Ct. 479 , 27 L.Ed.2d 433 (1971), it focuses on the nature of the communication — not the status of the communicator. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Hunt v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System Commission
green
2 sentences1985The court then decided: [T]o allow lay representation of employees in administrative hearings dealing with personnel matters under the following conditions: 1) the lay representation must be provided without fee; 2) the subject matter of the hearing must have a value or represent an amount insufficient to warrant the employment of an attorney, but in no event shall lay representation be permitted if the value or amount involved exceeds $1,000. 127 Ariz. at 264 , 619 P.2d at 1041 . 1985The court then decided: [T]o allow lay representation of employees in administrative hearings dealing with personnel matters under the following conditions: 1) the lay representation must be provided without fee; 2) the subject matter of the hearing must have a value or represent an amount insufficient to warrant the employment of an attorney, but in no event shall lay representation be permitted if the value or amount involved exceeds $1,000. 127 Ariz. at 264 , 619 P.2d at 1041 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Southern Pacific Company v. Watkins
green
2 sentences1979See Merchant’s National Bank of Aurora v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co., 49 Ill.2d 118 , 273 N.E.2d 809 (1971); Southern Pacific Co. v. Watkins, 83 Nev. 471 , 435 P.2d 498 (1967). 6 But we are more persuaded by *571 Chief Justice Underwood’s dissent in Merchant’s National Bank of Aurora v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company, supra, wherein he said: “ ‘The subject matter of inquiry here is not of such a character that only persons of skill and experience in it are capable of forming a correct judgment about it. 1979See Merchant’s National Bank of Aurora v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co., 49 Ill.2d 118 , 273 N.E.2d 809 (1971); Southern Pacific Co. v. Watkins, 83 Nev. 471 , 435 P.2d 498 (1967). 6 But we are more persuaded by *571 Chief Justice Underwood’s dissent in Merchant’s National Bank of Aurora v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company, supra, wherein he said: “ ‘The subject matter of inquiry here is not of such a character that only persons of skill and experience in it are capable of forming a correct judgment about it. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Federal Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission of Arizona
green
2 sentences1967The first case to reach the Arizona Supreme Court after the act became effective, was the case of Federal Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission, 31 Ariz. 224 , 252 P. 512 (1926), the subject matter being the claim of partially dependent parents of a deceased workman. 1967The first case to reach the Arizona Supreme Court after the act became effective, was the case of Federal Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission, 31 Ariz. 224 , 252 P. 512 (1926), the subject matter being the claim of partially dependent parents of a deceased workman. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Snyder v. Betsch
neutral
2 sentences1946Tn the cases of Snyder v. Betsch, 56 Ariz. 508 , 109 P.2d 613 and 59 Ariz. 535 , 130 P.2d 510 , and Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. Miller, 63 Ariz. 544 , 164 P.2d 603 , we held that in actions in ejectment brought under Art. 15 of Ch. 27 all existing counter-claims must be filed or they were deemed waived if they arise out of the transaction or occurrence of the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim. 1946Tn the cases of Snyder v. Betsch, 56 Ariz. 508 , 109 P.2d 613 and 59 Ariz. 535 , 130 P.2d 510 , and Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. Miller, 63 Ariz. 544 , 164 P.2d 603 , we held that in actions in ejectment brought under Art. 15 of Ch. 27 all existing counter-claims must be filed or they were deemed waived if they arise out of the transaction or occurrence of the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Snyder v. Betsch
neutral
2 sentences1946Tn the cases of Snyder v. Betsch, 56 Ariz. 508 , 109 P.2d 613 and 59 Ariz. 535 , 130 P.2d 510 , and Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. Miller, 63 Ariz. 544 , 164 P.2d 603 , we held that in actions in ejectment brought under Art. 15 of Ch. 27 all existing counter-claims must be filed or they were deemed waived if they arise out of the transaction or occurrence of the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim. 1946Tn the cases of Snyder v. Betsch, 56 Ariz. 508 , 109 P.2d 613 and 59 Ariz. 535 , 130 P.2d 510 , and Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. Miller, 63 Ariz. 544 , 164 P.2d 603 , we held that in actions in ejectment brought under Art. 15 of Ch. 27 all existing counter-claims must be filed or they were deemed waived if they arise out of the transaction or occurrence of the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. Miller
green
2 sentences1946Tn the cases of Snyder v. Betsch, 56 Ariz. 508 , 109 P.2d 613 and 59 Ariz. 535 , 130 P.2d 510 , and Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. Miller, 63 Ariz. 544 , 164 P.2d 603 , we held that in actions in ejectment brought under Art. 15 of Ch. 27 all existing counter-claims must be filed or they were deemed waived if they arise out of the transaction or occurrence of the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim. 1946Tn the cases of Snyder v. Betsch, 56 Ariz. 508 , 109 P.2d 613 and 59 Ariz. 535 , 130 P.2d 510 , and Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. Miller, 63 Ariz. 544 , 164 P.2d 603 , we held that in actions in ejectment brought under Art. 15 of Ch. 27 all existing counter-claims must be filed or they were deemed waived if they arise out of the transaction or occurrence of the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.