30 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1878–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.green2 sentences1995See Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc. (1994), Ind., 637 N.E.2d 1282 , reh’g denied. 1994See Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc. (1994), Ind., 637 N.E.2d 1282, 1285 (citing Wilson v. Betz Corp. (1959), 130 Ind.App. 83, 91 , 159 N.E.2d 402, 405 ; Homan v. Belleville Lumber & Supply Co. (1937), 104 Ind.App. 96 , 8 N.E.2d 127 ). | 2 | 2 |
Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. Pendergreen2 sentences1987Thornton v. Pender (1978), 268 Ind. 540 , 377 N.E.2d 613 ; Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Thomas (1984), Ind.App., 463 N.E.2d 315 . 1987Thornton v. Pender (1978), 268 Ind. 540 , 377 N.E.2d 613 ; Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Thomas (1984), Ind.App., 463 N.E.2d 315 . | 1 | 2 |
Cigna-INA/Aetna v. Hagerman-Shambaughgreen1 sentence2025Accordingly, a party refusing to identify certain persons under Trial Rule 26(B)(1) must demonstrate those persons “ha[ve] no possible relevance to the subject matter of the claim.” CIGNA-INA/Aetna v. Hagerman-Shambaugh, 473 N.E.2d 1033, 1036 (Ind. Ct. App. 1985) (“[R]elevancy for the purposes of discovery is not the same as relevancy at trial.”), reh’g denied, trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Rich v. FIDELITY TRUST CO., ETC.green2 sentences2015Trust Co. of Indianapolis, 137 Ind. App. 619, 632 , 207 N.E.2d 850, 858 (1965) (“The trial court cannot have jurisdiction over the subject matter of a claim against nonexistent entities.”). 2015Trust Co. of Indianapolis, 137 Ind. App. 619, 632 , 207 N.E.2d 850, 858 (1965) (“The trial court cannot have jurisdiction over the subject matter of a claim against nonexistent entities.”). | 1 | 1 |
Hubbard v. Columbia Women's Hospital of Indianapolisgreen1 sentence2015“Subject matter jurisdiction is the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings then before the court belong.” Hubbard v. Columbia Women’s Hosp. of Indianapolis, 807 N.E.2d 45, 50 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Wilson v. BETZ CORPORATIONgreen2 sentences1994See Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc. (1994), Ind., 637 N.E.2d 1282, 1285 (citing Wilson v. Betz Corp. (1959), 130 Ind.App. 83, 91 , 159 N.E.2d 402, 405 ; Homan v. Belleville Lumber & Supply Co. (1937), 104 Ind.App. 96 , 8 N.E.2d 127 ). 1994See Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc. (1994), Ind., 637 N.E.2d 1282, 1285 (citing Wilson v. Betz Corp. (1959), 130 Ind.App. 83, 91 , 159 N.E.2d 402, 405 ; Homan v. Belleville Lumber & Supply Co. (1937), 104 Ind.App. 96 , 8 N.E.2d 127 ). | 1 | 1 |
| American Car & Foundry Co. v. Wyattgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Powers v. State
green
2 sentences1984Powers v. State, (1982) Ind., 431 N.E.2d 799 ; Mack v. State, (1983) Ind., 457 N.E.2d 200 . 1982Powers v. State, (1981) Ind., 431 N.E.2d 799 ; Lock v. State, (1980) Ind., 403 N.E.2d 1360 . | 2 | 1982–1984 |
Cherry v. State
green
2 sentences1982Cherry v. State, (1981) Ind., 414 N.E.2d 301 . 1982Cherry v. State, (1981) Ind., 414 N.E.2d 301 ; Norton v. State, (1980) Ind., 408 N.E.2d 514 ; Tolbert v. State, (1979) Ind., 391 N.E.2d 823 . | 2 | 1982–1982 |
Kilander v. Hoover
neutral
2 sentences1901The law upon which counsel base their argument is well stated in Kilander v. Hoover, 111 Ind. 10 , where the court said: “If it appears that the first judgment involved the whole claim or extended to the whole subject-matter, and settled the entire defense to the whole of a series of notes or claims, and adjudicated the whole subject-matter of a defense, equally relevant to and conclusive of the controversy between the parties, as well in respect to the claim or defense in judgment, as in respect to other claims and defenses thereto, pertaining to the same transaction or subject-matter, then t 1893The Supreme Court, in Kilander v. Hoover, 111 Ind. 10 , says: “If it appears that the first judgment involved the whole claim, or extended to the whole subject-matter, and settled the entire defense to the whole of a series of notes or claims, and adjudicated the whole subject-matter of a defense, equally relevant to and conclusive of the controversy between the parties, as well in respect to the claim or defense in judgment, as in respect to other claims and defenses thereto, pertaining to the same transaction or subject-matter, then the first judgment operates as an estoppel as to the whole. | 2 | 1893–1901 |
Ransburg Industries v. Brown
green
1 sentence2002Id. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Mannon v. Howmet Transport Service, Inc.
green
1 sentence1995Mannon v. *1083 Howmet Transport Service, Inc. (1995), Ind.App., 645 N.E.2d 1135, 1136 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Homan v. Belleville Lumber and Supply Co.
green
2 sentences1994See Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc. (1994), Ind., 637 N.E.2d 1282, 1285 (citing Wilson v. Betz Corp. (1959), 130 Ind.App. 83, 91 , 159 N.E.2d 402, 405 ; Homan v. Belleville Lumber & Supply Co. (1937), 104 Ind.App. 96 , 8 N.E.2d 127 ). 1994See Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc. (1994), Ind., 637 N.E.2d 1282, 1285 (citing Wilson v. Betz Corp. (1959), 130 Ind.App. 83, 91 , 159 N.E.2d 402, 405 ; Homan v. Belleville Lumber & Supply Co. (1937), 104 Ind.App. 96 , 8 N.E.2d 127 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Jackson v. Russell
green
1 sentence1988Id. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Thomas
green
1 sentence1987Thornton v. Pender (1978), 268 Ind. 540 , 377 N.E.2d 613 ; Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Thomas (1984), Ind.App., 463 N.E.2d 315 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences1986This case is somewhat analogous to Jones v. State (1973), 260 Ind. 463 , 296 N.E.2d 407 , upon the issue of an investigating officer testifying regarding certain tests which he had performed. 1986This case is somewhat analogous to Jones v. State (1973), 260 Ind. 463 , 296 N.E.2d 407 , upon the issue of an investigating officer testifying regarding certain tests which he had performed. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Front v. Lane
green
1 sentence1985Given that the purpose of discovery rules is to allow liberal discovery procedures, Front v. Lane (1982), Ind.App., 443 N.E.2d 95 , we cannot say the court was compelled to find the documents sought by Hagerman had no possible relevance to the subject matter of the claim. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
MacK v. State
green
1 sentence1984Powers v. State, (1982) Ind., 431 N.E.2d 799 ; Mack v. State, (1983) Ind., 457 N.E.2d 200 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Short v. State
green
1 sentence1983Short v. State (1982), Ind., 443 N.E.2d 298 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Lottie v. State
green
1 sentence1983Appellant cites Lottie v. State, (1980) Ind., 406 N.E.2d 632 in support of his contention the second paragraph of the instruction was a correct statement of the law. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Norton v. State
green
1 sentence1982Cherry v. State, (1981) Ind., 414 N.E.2d 301 ; Norton v. State, (1980) Ind., 408 N.E.2d 514 ; Tolbert v. State, (1979) Ind., 391 N.E.2d 823 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Tolbert v. State
green
1 sentence1982Cherry v. State, (1981) Ind., 414 N.E.2d 301 ; Norton v. State, (1980) Ind., 408 N.E.2d 514 ; Tolbert v. State, (1979) Ind., 391 N.E.2d 823 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Lock v. State
green
1 sentence1982Powers v. State, (1981) Ind., 431 N.E.2d 799 ; Lock v. State, (1980) Ind., 403 N.E.2d 1360 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Halladay
green
1 sentence1981Eagle contends that no other instruction covered the subject matter of the instruction and that it was a correct statement of the law because the language is taken from Halladay, supra. We disagree. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Timm v. State
neutral
2 sentences1979E. g., Spaulding v. State, (1978) Ind., 373 N.E.2d 165 ; Patterson v. State, (1978) Ind., 371 N.E.2d 1309 ; Timm v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 537 , 356 N.E.2d 222 . 1979E. g., Spaulding v. State, (1978) Ind., 373 N.E.2d 165 ; Patterson v. State, (1978) Ind., 371 N.E.2d 1309 ; Timm v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 537 , 356 N.E.2d 222 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Spaulding v. State
neutral
1 sentence1979E. g., Spaulding v. State, (1978) Ind., 373 N.E.2d 165 ; Patterson v. State, (1978) Ind., 371 N.E.2d 1309 ; Timm v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 537 , 356 N.E.2d 222 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Patterson v. State
green
1 sentence1979E. g., Spaulding v. State, (1978) Ind., 373 N.E.2d 165 ; Patterson v. State, (1978) Ind., 371 N.E.2d 1309 ; Timm v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 537 , 356 N.E.2d 222 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Richmond Gas Corporation v. Reeves
green
1 sentence1977Richmond Gas Corporation v. Reeves (1973), [158] Ind. App. [338], 302 N.E.2d 795 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Loftis v. State
green
2 sentences1976Lewis v. State, (1976) 264 Ind. 288 , 342 N.E.2d 859 ; Loftis v. State, (1971) 256 Ind. 417 , 269 N.E.2d 746 . 1976Lewis v. State, (1976) 264 Ind. 288 , 342 N.E.2d 859 ; Loftis v. State, (1971) 256 Ind. 417 , 269 N.E.2d 746 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Lewis v. State
green
2 sentences1976Lewis v. State, (1976) 264 Ind. 288 , 342 N.E.2d 859 ; Loftis v. State, (1971) 256 Ind. 417 , 269 N.E.2d 746 . 1976Lewis v. State, (1976) 264 Ind. 288 , 342 N.E.2d 859 ; Loftis v. State, (1971) 256 Ind. 417 , 269 N.E.2d 746 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Kell v. State green | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Burtch
neutral
1 sentence1960See: Kell v. State (1924), 194 Ind. 374 , 142 N. E. 865 ; Ewbank Crim. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
| Everson v. Seller neutral | 1 | 1955–1955 |
| Terry v. Davenport neutral | 1 | 1955–1955 |
| Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Sherry neutral | 1 | 1955–1955 |
| School City of Rushville v. Hayes green | 1 | 1933–1933 |
| Bullock v. Robison green | 1 | 1933–1933 |
| Garfield v. State green | 1 | 1907–1907 |
| Williams v. State green | 1 | 1878–1878 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.