9 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1933–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wright v. Wrightgreen2 sentences2020With respect to the hearing requirement, we have held that “[d]ue process requires, at the minimum, that each party be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard.” Wright v. Wright, 181 S.W.3d 49, 53 (Ky. App. 2005) (citation omitted). 2015KRS 403.750(1) per-; mits a court to enter a DVO if, following the hearing, the court “finds from a preponderance of the evidence that an act or acts of domestic violence and abuse have occurred and may again occur....” With respect to the hearing requirement, we have held that “[d]ue process requires, at the minimum, that each party be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard.” Wright v. Wright, 181 S.W.3d 49, 53 (Ky.App.2005). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schaffeld v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2019We also consider and reject the argument that the family court should have given a new purge amount at the hearing on the violation of the conditional discharge. "[T]he finding of a violation of the terms of conditional discharge was not a finding of additional contempt requiring the setting of a purge amount, but simply the trial court's enforcing its previously entered order." Schaffeld , 368 S.W.3d at 135 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2007Assuming the officers’ testimony was subject to a review under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmiaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), there was no motion for a hearing to challenge their credentials. 2007Assuming the officers’ testimony was subject to a review under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmiaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), there was no motion for a hearing to challenge their credentials. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Jacobs
green
1 sentence1998Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Jacobs, Ky., 269 S.W.2d 189 (1954); Utility Reg. Comm. v. Kentucky Water Service Co., Inc., Ky., 642 S.W.2d 591 (1982); Bullock v. Peabody Coal Co., Ky., 882 S.W.2d 676 (1994); Bentley v. Aero Energy, Inc., Ky.App., 903 S.W.2d 912 (1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Utility Regulatory Commission v. Kentucky Water Service Co.
green
1 sentence1998Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Jacobs, Ky., 269 S.W.2d 189 (1954); Utility Reg. Comm. v. Kentucky Water Service Co., Inc., Ky., 642 S.W.2d 591 (1982); Bullock v. Peabody Coal Co., Ky., 882 S.W.2d 676 (1994); Bentley v. Aero Energy, Inc., Ky.App., 903 S.W.2d 912 (1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Bullock v. Peabody Coal Co.
neutral
1 sentence1998Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Jacobs, Ky., 269 S.W.2d 189 (1954); Utility Reg. Comm. v. Kentucky Water Service Co., Inc., Ky., 642 S.W.2d 591 (1982); Bullock v. Peabody Coal Co., Ky., 882 S.W.2d 676 (1994); Bentley v. Aero Energy, Inc., Ky.App., 903 S.W.2d 912 (1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Bentley v. Aero Energy, Inc.
green
1 sentence1998Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Jacobs, Ky., 269 S.W.2d 189 (1954); Utility Reg. Comm. v. Kentucky Water Service Co., Inc., Ky., 642 S.W.2d 591 (1982); Bullock v. Peabody Coal Co., Ky., 882 S.W.2d 676 (1994); Bentley v. Aero Energy, Inc., Ky.App., 903 S.W.2d 912 (1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Stinnett v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1970After his first RCr 11.42 motion was ruled on, the case of Stinnett v. Commonwealth, Ky., 446 S.W.2d 292 (1969) was decided, wherein we held that the allegation of a denial of the right to appeal was sufficient to require the granting of a hearing. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Hampton v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1970While as a general rule courts will not entertain successive RCr 11.42 motions (see Hampton v. Commonwealth, Ky., 454 S.W.2d 672 (1970), under the circumstances shown in this proceeding we believe appellant is entitled to a hearing on his claim that he was denied an appeal from the original judgment of conviction, and the Commonwealth concedes this. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Everett v. Bruckert
green
1 sentence1968Under these facts the search with Priscilla’s consent was valid. 47 Am.Jur., Searches and Seizures, 1967 Supplement, pp. 85, 86; Annotation, 31 A.L.R.2d 1981 ; Gray v. Commonwealth, 198 Ky. 610 , 249 S.W. 769 ; Morris v. Commonwealth, 306 Ky. 349 , 208 S.W.2d 58 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Morris v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1968Under these facts the search with Priscilla’s consent was valid. 47 Am.Jur., Searches and Seizures, 1967 Supplement, pp. 85, 86; Annotation, 31 A.L.R.2d 1981 ; Gray v. Commonwealth, 198 Ky. 610 , 249 S.W. 769 ; Morris v. Commonwealth, 306 Ky. 349 , 208 S.W.2d 58 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Gray v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1968Under these facts the search with Priscilla’s consent was valid. 47 Am.Jur., Searches and Seizures, 1967 Supplement, pp. 85, 86; Annotation, 31 A.L.R.2d 1981 ; Gray v. Commonwealth, 198 Ky. 610 , 249 S.W. 769 ; Morris v. Commonwealth, 306 Ky. 349 , 208 S.W.2d 58 . 1968Under these facts the search with Priscilla’s consent was valid. 47 Am.Jur., Searches and Seizures, 1967 Supplement, pp. 85, 86; Annotation, 31 A.L.R.2d 1981 ; Gray v. Commonwealth, 198 Ky. 610 , 249 S.W. 769 ; Morris v. Commonwealth, 306 Ky. 349 , 208 S.W.2d 58 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Taylor v. Cornett Lewis Coal Co.
green
2 sentences1950It is true that in Taylor v. Cornett Lewis Coal Co., 281 Ky. 366 , 136 S. W. 2d 21, 24 , we held the foregoing section shifted the burden of proof to the employer to meet or explain away the presumption of acceptance; but in the instant case the stipulation mei the statutory presumption. 1950It is true that in Taylor v. Cornett Lewis Coal Co., 281 Ky. 366 , 136 S. W. 2d 21, 24 , we held the foregoing section shifted the burden of proof to the employer to meet or explain away the presumption of acceptance; but in the instant case the stipulation mei the statutory presumption. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Moore v. Bay
green
2 sentences1933Bay et al., 149 Md. 286 , 131 A. 459 ; State v. Woodbury, 321 Mo. 275 , 10 S. W. (2d) 524 ; Walker v. Grice, 162 S. C. 29, 159 S. E. 914 . *602 It is agreed that the following questions are presented in Campbell’s petition: “A. Whether or not the failure of a challenged voter to appear personally at the hearing of the challenge is conclusive evidence that he is no longer entitled to registration. 1933Bay et al., 149 Md. 286 , 131 A. 459 ; State v. Woodbury, 321 Mo. 275 , 10 S. W. (2d) 524 ; Walker v. Grice, 162 S. C. 29, 159 S. E. 914 . *602 It is agreed that the following questions are presented in Campbell’s petition: “A. Whether or not the failure of a challenged voter to appear personally at the hearing of the challenge is conclusive evidence that he is no longer entitled to registration. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
State Ex Rel. Meyer v. Woodbury
green
2 sentences1933Bay et al., 149 Md. 286 , 131 A. 459 ; State v. Woodbury, 321 Mo. 275 , 10 S. W. (2d) 524 ; Walker v. Grice, 162 S. C. 29, 159 S. E. 914 . *602 It is agreed that the following questions are presented in Campbell’s petition: “A. Whether or not the failure of a challenged voter to appear personally at the hearing of the challenge is conclusive evidence that he is no longer entitled to registration. 1933Bay et al., 149 Md. 286 , 131 A. 459 ; State v. Woodbury, 321 Mo. 275 , 10 S. W. (2d) 524 ; Walker v. Grice, 162 S. C. 29, 159 S. E. 914 . *602 It is agreed that the following questions are presented in Campbell’s petition: “A. Whether or not the failure of a challenged voter to appear personally at the hearing of the challenge is conclusive evidence that he is no longer entitled to registration. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Walker v. Grice
neutral
1 sentence1933Bay et al., 149 Md. 286 , 131 A. 459 ; State v. Woodbury, 321 Mo. 275 , 10 S. W. (2d) 524 ; Walker v. Grice, 162 S. C. 29, 159 S. E. 914 . *602 It is agreed that the following questions are presented in Campbell’s petition: “A. Whether or not the failure of a challenged voter to appear personally at the hearing of the challenge is conclusive evidence that he is no longer entitled to registration. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.