Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hartless v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2025See Hartless v. Commonwealth, 29 Va. App. 172, 175 (1999) (“The good behavior requirement sufficiently defined a period of 3 In Curry v. Commonwealth, No. 0180-15-1, slip op. at 4 (Va. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2015) (alterations in original), a panel of this Court interpreted a prior version of Code § 19.2-306(B) which included the same language from the current statute regarding the requirement for a circuit court to “issue[] process to notify the accused or . . . compel his appearance before the court.” There, the panel stated that “the plain language of [Code § 19.2-306(B)] does not require a deta | 1 | 1 |
Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Robbinsgreen1 sentence2025Nejati v. Stageberg, 286 Va. 197 , 203 (2013) (quoting Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Robbins, 261 Va. 12, 18 (2001)). - 20 - locality fails to hold the hearing or where the hearing fails to comport with minimal due process requirements. | 1 | 1 |
Farmington Country Club, Inc. v. Marshallgreen2 sentences2014The commission specifically found that there was no “opinion from a medical professional supporting causation” and concluded “claimant failed to meet her burden of proving that she suffered any head or spine injuries on May 7, 2009.” “Causation of a medical condition may be proved by either direct or circumstantial evidence, including medical evidence or ‘the testimony of a claimant.’” Farmington Country Club v. Marshall, 47 Va. App. 15, 26 , 622 S.E.2d 233, 239 (2005) (quoting Dollar Gen. 2014The commission specifically found that there was no “opinion from a medical professional supporting causation” and concluded “claimant failed to meet her burden of proving that she suffered any head or spine injuries on May 7, 2009.” “Causation of a medical condition may be proved by either direct or circumstantial evidence, including medical evidence or ‘the testimony of a claimant.’” Farmington Country Club v. Marshall, 47 Va. App. 15, 26 , 622 S.E.2d 233, 239 (2005) (quoting Dollar Gen. | 1 | 1 |
Shoup v. Shoupgreen2 sentences2002See Shoup v. Shoup, 31 Va.App. 621, 627-28 , 525 S.E.2d 61, 64-65 (2000) (rejecting wife’s contention that trial court lacked authority to order wife to pay husband $46,154 plus interest, at a hearing on a rule to show case why she should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the parties’ agreement, where she was not found in contempt). 2002See Shoup v. Shoup, 31 Va.App. 621, 627-28 , 525 S.E.2d 61, 64-65 (2000) (rejecting wife’s contention that trial court lacked authority to order wife to pay husband $46,154 plus interest, at a hearing on a rule to show case why she should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the parties’ agreement, where she was not found in contempt). | 1 | 1 |
Leonard v. Arnoldgreen2 sentences1980It points to our opinion in Leonard v. Arnold, 218 Va. 210 , *416 215, 237 S.E.2d 97, 100 (1977), where we said: “An application for compensation based on a ‘change in condition’ cannot be used as a substitute for an original hearing on a new and separate accident.” Appellants argue that the reverse of this is equally true. 1980It points to our opinion in Leonard v. Arnold, 218 Va. 210 , *416 215, 237 S.E.2d 97, 100 (1977), where we said: “An application for compensation based on a ‘change in condition’ cannot be used as a substitute for an original hearing on a new and separate accident.” Appellants argue that the reverse of this is equally true. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Alabama
green
1 sentence2018Contrary to appellant’s contention in his third assignment of error, nothing in the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller or Montgomery requires a specific factual finding that appellant is “irreparably incorrigible” before pronouncing a sentence of life without parole.3 The requirement is that the sentencing official “must have the opportunity to consider mitigating circumstances before imposing the harshest possible penalty for juveniles.” Miller, 567 U.S. at 489 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Williams v. People's Life Insurance
green
2 sentences2003Co., 19 Va.App. 530 , 452 S.E.2d 881 (1995), and (2) in finding that the testimony of the new witness was not reasonably available before the initial hearing. 2003Co., 19 Va.App. 530 , 452 S.E.2d 881 (1995), and (2) in finding that the testimony of the new witness was not reasonably available before the initial hearing. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Virginia Board of Medicine v. Fetta
green
1 sentence1995We held that the purpose of this procedure was to give the members of the board “information on an equal basis.” Id. at 1175-76 , 408 S.E.2d at 575 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Virginia Board of Medicine v. Fetta
green
1 sentence1995We held that the purpose of this procedure was to give the members of the board “information on an equal basis.” Id. at 1175-76 , 408 S.E.2d at 575 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Noblin v. Randolph Corp.
green
2 sentences1983In Noblin v. Randolph Corp., 180 Va. 345 , 23 S.E.2d 209 (1942), the injured employee, with the advice and assistance of his employer, obtained a judgment against a third-party tortfeasor after filing a claim for compensation under the Act, but before the hearing on the claim was held. 1983In Noblin v. Randolph Corp., 180 Va. 345 , 23 S.E.2d 209 (1942), the injured employee, with the advice and assistance of his employer, obtained a judgment against a third-party tortfeasor after filing a claim for compensation under the Act, but before the hearing on the claim was held. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.