9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Union Planters Bank, Nat. Ass'n v. Rogersgreen2 sentences2008One such rule of construction is that "specific language controls over general inconsistent language in a contract." Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Rogers, 912 So.2d 116, 120 (Miss.2005). 2007One such rule of construction is that “specific language controls over general inconsistent language in a contract.” Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Rogers, 912 So. 2d 116, 120 (Miss. 2005). | 2 | 2 |
Hardison v. Stategreen2 sentences2022Hardison explained that “the proponent of a strike—at the second step of the analysis—need only show a race-neutral reason.” Hardison, 94 So. 3d at 1099-1100 . 2019We note that “[t]he Batson analysis has three steps, and it is imperative that a trial judge follow those steps accordingly.” Hardison, 94 So. 3d at 1099 (¶24). “[I]t is at the third-step (pretext)—not the second step of the analysis—that persuasiveness becomes relevant.” Id. at 1100 (¶25). 8 C. | 1 | 2 |
Nichols v. Stategreen1 sentence2022The second step of the analysis is reached “only when a threshold comparison of the crime committed to the sentence imposed leads to an inference of ‘gross disproportionality.’” Nichols v. State, 826 So. 2d 1288, 1290 (¶12) (Miss. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Randall v. Stategreen2 sentences2012Unless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the ... explanation, the reason offered will be deemed race neutral.” Lynch v. State, 877 So.2d 1254, 1271 (Miss.2004) (quoting Randall v. State, 716 So.2d 584, 588 (Miss.1998)). “[R]ace neutral explanations must be viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court’s findings.” Id. at 1270 (quoting Walker v. State, 815 So.2d 1209, 1215 (Miss.2002)). 2012Unless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the ... explanation, the reason offered will be deemed race neutral.” Lynch v. State, 877 So.2d 1254, 1271 (Miss.2004) (quoting Randall v. State, 716 So.2d 584, 588 (Miss.1998)). “[R]ace neutral explanations must be viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court’s findings.” Id. at 1270 (quoting Walker v. State, 815 So.2d 1209, 1215 (Miss.2002)). | 1 | 1 |
Walker v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Unless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the ... explanation, the reason offered will be deemed race neutral.” Lynch v. State, 877 So.2d 1254, 1271 (Miss.2004) (quoting Randall v. State, 716 So.2d 584, 588 (Miss.1998)). “[R]ace neutral explanations must be viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court’s findings.” Id. at 1270 (quoting Walker v. State, 815 So.2d 1209, 1215 (Miss.2002)). | 1 | 1 |
Lynch v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Unless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the ... explanation, the reason offered will be deemed race neutral.” Lynch v. State, 877 So.2d 1254, 1271 (Miss.2004) (quoting Randall v. State, 716 So.2d 584, 588 (Miss.1998)). “[R]ace neutral explanations must be viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court’s findings.” Id. at 1270 (quoting Walker v. State, 815 So.2d 1209, 1215 (Miss.2002)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Purkett v. Elem
green
2 sentences2024The second step of the analysis does not even require the explanation to be ‘plausible.’” Id. (citing Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767-68 , 115 S. Ct. 1769 , 131 L. 2024The second step of the analysis does not even require the explanation to be ‘plausible.’” Id. (citing Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767-68 , 115 S. Ct. 1769 , 131 L. | 2 | 2022–2024 |
McDaniel v. Ritter
green
2 sentences2011Horne, 897 So.2d at 976 (citing McDaniel, 556 So.2d at 308 ). 2011Horne, 897 So.2d at 976 (citing McDaniel, 556 So.2d at 308 ). | 2 | 2009–2011 |
Horne v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer System
green
2 sentences2011Horne, 897 So.2d at 976 (citing McDaniel, 556 So.2d at 308 ). 2011Horne, 897 So.2d at 976 (citing McDaniel, 556 So.2d at 308 ). | 2 | 2009–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.