defamation claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

defamation claim in Washington

66 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2026 9 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (14)

CaseFollowedCited
Mohr v. Grantgreen
wash · 2005 · cited in 8 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2010–2026
2 sentences

2026“Washington does not require a defamation defendant to ‘prove the literal truth of every claimed defamatory statement.’” Mohr, 153 Wn.2d at 825 (citing Mark v. Seattle Times, 96 Wn.2d 473, 494 , 635 P.2d 1081 (1981)).

2020See Mohr v. Grant, 153 Wn.2d 812, 822 , 108 P.3d 768 (2005) (plurality opinion); see also N.Y.

28
Schmalenberg v. Tacoma News, Inc.green
washctapp · 1997 · cited in 7 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1999–2025
2 sentences

2025A. FALSITY “A defamation claim must be based on a statement that is provably false.” Schmalenberg, 87 Wn.

2011Dunlap v. Wayne, 105 Wash.2d 529, 538 , 716 P.2d 842 (1986); see also Schmalenberg v. Tacoma News, Inc., 87 Wash.App. 579, 590 , 943 P.2d 350 (1997) ("A defamation claim must be based on a statement that is provably false").

27
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.green
scotus · 1990 · cited in 4 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2005–2011
2 sentences

2011Dunlap, 105 Wash.2d at 538 , 716 P.2d 842 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 566); see also Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 18 , 110 S.Ct. 2695 , 111 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990) (there is not a wholesale exception to defamation for anything that might be labeled an opinion).

2011Dunlap, 105 Wash.2d at 538 , 716 P.2d 842 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 566); see also Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 18 , 110 S.Ct. 2695 , 111 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990) (there is not a wholesale exception to defamation for anything that might be labeled an opinion).

24
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.green
scotus · 1974 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2001–2011
2 sentences

2011Robel v. Roundup Corp., 148 Wash.2d 35, 55 , 59 P.3d 611 (2002); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 339-40 , 94 S.Ct. 2997 , 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974) ("However pernicious an opinion may seem, we depend for its correction not on the conscience of judges and juries but on the competition of other ideas."). ¶ 24 An opinion can support a defamation claim if it implies that undisclosed defamatory facts form the basis of the opinion.

2011Robel v. Roundup Corp., 148 Wash.2d 35, 55 , 59 P.3d 611 (2002); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 339-40 , 94 S.Ct. 2997 , 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974) ("However pernicious an opinion may seem, we depend for its correction not on the conscience of judges and juries but on the competition of other ideas."). ¶ 24 An opinion can support a defamation claim if it implies that undisclosed defamatory facts form the basis of the opinion.

22
Capitol Records v. Rita Carmichaelgreen
alsd · 2007 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010Elektra, 618 F.Supp.2d at 92 ; see, e.g., Capitol Records, 508 F.Supp.2d at 1083-84 ; Peerless Indus., Inc. v. Herrin Illinois Cafe, Inc., 593 F.Supp. 1339, 1340 (E.D.Mo.1984). ¶ 18 We note that, in another case, the trial court refused to enter a default judgment because it believed that the defamation claim at issue was subject to a claim of absolute governmental privilege.

2010Elektra, 618 F.Supp.2d at 92 ; see, e.g., Capitol Records, 508 F.Supp.2d at 1083-84 ; Peerless Indus., Inc. v. Herrin Illinois Cafe, Inc., 593 F.Supp. 1339, 1340 (E.D.Mo.1984). ¶ 18 We note that, in another case, the trial court refused to enter a default judgment because it believed that the defamation claim at issue was subject to a claim of absolute governmental privilege.

22
PEERLESS INDUSTRIES v. Herrin Illinois Cafe, Inc.green
moed · 1984 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010Elektra, 618 F.Supp.2d at 92 ; see, e.g., Capitol Records, 508 F.Supp.2d at 1083-84 ; Peerless Indus., Inc. v. Herrin Illinois Cafe, Inc., 593 F.Supp. 1339, 1340 (E.D.Mo.1984). ¶ 18 We note that, in another case, the trial court refused to enter a default judgment because it believed that the defamation claim at issue was subject to a claim of absolute governmental privilege.

2010Elektra, 618 F.Supp.2d at 92 ; see, e.g., Capitol Records, 508 F.Supp.2d at 1083-84 ; Peerless Indus., Inc. v. Herrin Illinois Cafe, Inc., 593 F.Supp. 1339, 1340 (E.D.Mo.1984). ¶ 18 We note that, in another case, the trial court refused to enter a default judgment because it believed that the defamation claim at issue was subject to a claim of absolute governmental privilege.

22
Julian Toney v. Wcco Television, Midwest Cable and Satellite, Inc., Also Known as Wcco Tv, Channel 4, Also Known as Iowcco Tv, Channel 411green
ca8 · 1996 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
2 sentences

2005See Toney v. WCCO Television, Midwest Cable & Satellite, Inc., 85 F.3d 383, 394 (8th Cir. 1996) (reversing summary judgment for defendant, remanding for a new trial, and stating “Milkovich made clear that implications, like plain statements, may give rise to a defamation claim.

2005See Toney v. WCCO Television, Midwest Cable & Satellite, Inc., 85 F.3d 383, 394 (8th Cir.1996) (reversing summary judgment for defendant, remanding for a new trial, and stating " Milkovich made clear that implications, like plain statements, may give rise to a defamation claim.

22
Mohr v. Grantgreen
wash · 2005 · cited in 4 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2010–2020
2 sentences

2020See Mohr v. Grant, 153 Wn.2d 812, 822 , 108 P.3d 768 (2005) (plurality opinion); see also N.Y.

2015Mohr v. Grant, 153 Wn.2d 812, 823 , 108 P.3d 768 (2005) (plurality opinion).

14
Pasqualini v. MortgageIT, Inc.green
nysd · 2007 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
11
Krepps v. Reinergreen
nysd · 2008 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
11
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.green
scotus · 1985 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
11
Amsbury v. Cowles Publishing Co.green
wash · 1969 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
11
Caruso v. Local Union No. 690green
wash · 1983 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
11
Kilgore v. Youngergreen
cal · 1982 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (57)

CaseCitedYears
Mark v. Seattle Times green
wash · 1981
2 sentences

2019To defeat a defendant’s motion for summary judgment on a defamation claim, the plaintiff “must establish a prima facie case by evidence of convincing clarity.” Mark, 96 Wn.2d at 487 .

2008To defeat a defamation claim, “[a] defendant need only show that the statement is substantially true or that the gist of the story, the portion that carries the ‘sting’, is true.” Mark v. Seattle Times, 96 Wn.2d 473, 494 , 635 P.2d 1081 (1981).

161995–2026
Dunlap v. Wayne green
wash · 1986
2 sentences

2026Therefore, a defamation claim can arise from “an expression of opinion that is not based on disclosed or assumed facts and therefore implies that there are undisclosed facts on which the opinion is based.” Dunlap v. Wayne, 105 Wn.2d 529, 540 , 716 P.2d 842 (1986) (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS at § 566 cmt. c).

2026Therefore, a defamation claim can arise from “an expression of opinion that is not based on disclosed or assumed facts and therefore implies that there are undisclosed facts on which the opinion is based.” Dunlap v. Wayne, 105 Wn.2d 529, 540 , 716 P.2d 842 (1986) (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS at § 566 cmt. c).

32011–2026
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan green
scotus · 1964
2 sentences

2025New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S. Ct. 710, 11 L.

2025New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S. Ct. 710, 11 L.

31987–2025
J-U-B Engineers, Inc. v. Routsen green
washctapp · 1993
2 sentences

2010J-U-B Eng'rs, Inc. v. Routsen, 69 Wash.App. 148, 150 , 848 P.2d 733 (1993).

2010J-U-B Eng'rs, Inc. v. Routsen, 69 Wash.App. 148, 150 , 848 P.2d 733 (1993).

32010–2010
Eastwood v. Cascade Broadcasting Co. green
wash · 1986
2 sentences

2016Id. at 469 .

2016A defamation claim for either libel or slander requires (a) “a false and defamatory statement concerning another”; (b) “an unprivileged communication to a third party”; (c) “fault amounting at *640 least to negligence on the publisher’s part”; and (d) “either actionability of the statement or special harm caused by the publication.” Eastwood, 106 Wn.2d at 470 ; Restatement (Second) of Torts § 558.

22016–2016
Vern Sims Ford, Inc. v. Hagel green
washctapp · 1986
2 sentences

2015The chairman told a local newspaper that Jennifer Wood’s performance as a communications coordinator was “lacking.” The court characterized the quotation as defamatory per se. ¶55 In Vern Sims Ford, Inc. v. Hagel, 42 Wn.

1997Obviously, there may be others as well. 61 Caruso, 100 Wn.2d at 353 ; Amsbury, 76 Wn.2d at 737, 739 ; Purvis, 54 Wn.2d at 751 ; Vern Sims Ford, Inc., 42 Wn.

21997–2015
Slayton v. Oklahoma green
scotus · 1982
2 sentences

2012Mark v. Seattle Times, 96 Wn.2d 473, 486 , 635 P.2d 1081 (1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1124 (1982).

1995App. 229, 237 , 580 P.2d 642 (1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 945 (1979)), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1124 (1982).

21995–2012
Lee v. the Columbian, Inc. green
washctapp · 1991
2 sentences

2010Lee v. Columbian, Inc., 64 Wash.App. 534, 538 , 826 P.2d 217 (1991).

2010Lee v. Columbian, Inc., 64 Wn.

22010–2010
ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC. v. Carter green
med · 2009
2 sentences

2010Elektra, 618 F.Supp.2d at 92 ; see, e.g., Capitol Records, 508 F.Supp.2d at 1083-84 ; Peerless Indus., Inc. v. Herrin Illinois Cafe, Inc., 593 F.Supp. 1339, 1340 (E.D.Mo.1984). ¶ 18 We note that, in another case, the trial court refused to enter a default judgment because it believed that the defamation claim at issue was subject to a claim of absolute governmental privilege.

2010Elektra, 618 F.Supp.2d at 92 ; see, e.g., Capitol Records, 508 F.Supp.2d at 1083-84 ; Peerless Indus., Inc. v. Herrin Illinois Cafe, Inc., 593 F.Supp. 1339, 1340 (E.D.Mo.1984). ¶ 18 We note that, in another case, the trial court refused to enter a default judgment because it believed that the defamation claim at issue was subject to a claim of absolute governmental privilege.

22010–2010
MacH v. Allison green
wisctapp · 2002
2 sentences

2005Indeed, Milkovich ultimately held that ‘a reasonable fact finder could conclude that the statements [at issue] imply an assertion that petitioner Milkovich peijured himself. . . [and that] th[is] connotation is sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false’ ” (alterations in original) (quoting Milkovich, 497 U.S. at 21 )); Mach v. Allison, 259 Wis.2d 686, 698-99 , 656 N.W.2d 766 (2002) (reversing summary judgment for the defendant in part, remanding for a new trial in part, and citing Milkovich for the proposition that “[t]he ‘statement’ that is the subject of a defamati

2005Indeed, Milkovich ultimately held that ‘a reasonable fact finder could conclude that the statements [at issue] imply an assertion that petitioner Milkovich peijured himself. . . [and that] th[is] connotation is sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false’ ” (alterations in original) (quoting Milkovich, 497 U.S. at 21 )); Mach v. Allison, 259 Wis.2d 686, 698-99 , 656 N.W.2d 766 (2002) (reversing summary judgment for the defendant in part, remanding for a new trial in part, and citing Milkovich for the proposition that “[t]he ‘statement’ that is the subject of a defamati

22005–2005
Sims v. Kiro, Inc. green
washctapp · 1978
2 sentences

1995Truth or Falsity and Defamatory Meaning To prevail on a defamation claim in Washington, the plaintiff must prove the following elements: (1) falsity, (2) an unprivileged communication, (3) fault, and (4) damages. 8 Mark v. Seattle Times, 96 Wn.2d 473, 486 , 635 P.2d 1081 (1981) (citing Sims v. KIRO, Inc., 20 Wn.

1995App. 229, 237 , 580 P.2d 642 (1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 945 (1979)), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1124 (1982).

21982–1995
LaMon v. Butler green
wash · 1989
1 sentence

2025LaMon v. Butler, 44 Wn. 20 No. 60121-4-II App. 654, 659, 722 P.2d 1373 (1986), aff’d, 112 Wn.2d 193 (1989).

12025–2025
Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston County green
wash · 2018
1 sentence

2025The trial court also rejected Thurman’s constitutional challenge to the UPEPA, finding that the application of the CR 12 and 56 standards were constitutional pursuant to Davis v. Cox, 183 Wn.2d 269 , 351 P.3d 862 (2015), abrogated on other grounds by Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston County, 191 Wn.2d 392 , 440 n. 15, 423 P.3d 223 (2018).

12025–2025
1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp. green
wash · 2006
1 sentence

2025Id.

12025–2025
Davis v. Cox green
wash · 2015
2 sentences

2025The trial court also rejected Thurman’s constitutional challenge to the UPEPA, finding that the application of the CR 12 and 56 standards were constitutional pursuant to Davis v. Cox, 183 Wn.2d 269 , 351 P.3d 862 (2015), abrogated on other grounds by Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston County, 191 Wn.2d 392 , 440 n. 15, 423 P.3d 223 (2018).

2025The trial court also rejected Thurman’s constitutional challenge to the UPEPA, finding that the application of the CR 12 and 56 standards were constitutional pursuant to Davis v. Cox, 183 Wn.2d 269 , 351 P.3d 862 (2015), abrogated on other grounds by Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston County, 191 Wn.2d 392 , 440 n. 15, 423 P.3d 223 (2018).

12025–2025
LaMon v. Butler neutral
washctapp · 1986
1 sentence

2025LaMon v. Butler, 44 Wn. 20 No. 60121-4-II App. 654, 659, 722 P.2d 1373 (1986), aff’d, 112 Wn.2d 193 (1989).

12025–2025
Benjamin v. Cowles Publishing Co. green
washctapp · 1984
1 sentence

2025Benjamin v. Cowles Publ’n Co., 37 Wn.

12025–2025
Maison de France, Ltd. v. Mais Oui!, Inc. green
washctapp · 2005
1 sentence

2025Maison de France, 126 Wn.

12025–2025
Rice v. Offshore Systems, Inc. green
washctapp · 2012
1 sentence

2024Rice v. Offshore Sys., Inc., 167 Wn.

12024–2024
Herzog Aluminum, Inc. v. General American Window Corp. green
washctapp · 1984
1 sentence

2021Herzog, 39 Wn.

12021–2021
State v. O'Neill green
wash · 2003
1 sentence

2021State v. O’Neill, 148 Wn.2d 564, 571 , 62 P.3d 489 (2003).

12021–2021
State v. O'NEILL green
wash · 2003
1 sentence

2021State v. O’Neill, 148 Wn.2d 564, 571 , 62 P.3d 489 (2003).

12021–2021
Stidham v. Department of Licensing green
washctapp · 1981
12020–2020
Lowe v. Rowe green
washctapp · 2012
12020–2020
Krepps v. Reiner green
ca2 · 2010
12017–2017
Total Call International, Inc. v. Perless Insurance green
calctapp · 2010
12015–2015
Wood v. Battle Ground School Dist. green
washctapp · 2001
12015–2015
Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. green
scotus · 1984
12015–2015
Doe v. Cahill green
del · 2005
12015–2015
Bender v. City of Seattle green
wash · 1983
12014–2014
Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability Now green
washctapp · 2004
12014–2014
Buss v. Superior Court green
cal · 1997
12013–2013
North Coast Elec. Co. v. Selig green
washctapp · 2007
12012–2012
Robel v. Roundup Corp. green
wash · 2002
12011–2011
Robel v. Roundup Corp. green
wash · 2002
12011–2011
Clawson v. Longview Publishing Co. green
wash · 1979
12010–2010
Northwest Prosthetic v. Centennial Ins. green
washctapp · 2000
12008–2008
Northwest Prosthetic & Orthotic Clinic, Inc. v. Centennial Insurance green
washctapp · 2000
12008–2008
Caruso v. LOCAL 690 INTERNL. BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS green
wash · 1987
12003–2003
Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co. green
wash · 1994
11998–1998

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 42u.s.c.1983 (6) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.020 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.060 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.090 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.24.510 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.180 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 331 (1985–2026) CA 209 (1970–2026) NY 154 (1983–2026) OH 135 (1990–2026) IL 106 (1988–2026) MI 93 (1987–2025) WA 66 (1980–2026) LA 65 (1985–2023) MN 57 (1985–2026) NJ 56 (1960–2026) MA 54 (1980–2026) PA 51 (1986–2026) ME 42 (1984–2024) FL 41 (1981–2025) GA 34 (1998–2025) AZ 34 (1976–2026) IN 33 (1982–2026) DE 32 (1988–2026) OR 31 (1990–2026) DC 27 (1991–2026) CO 26 (1985–2026) VA 26 (2002–2026) KY 25 (2005–2025) NC 25 (1994–2026) NV 23 (1993–2026) WI 21 (1983–2024) AL 20 (1988–2023) TN 19 (1999–2024) UT 17 (1983–2025) NM 17 (1989–2024) SC 17 (1997–2026) MO 16 (1996–2025) MS 16 (1986–2018) MD 16 (1985–2026) AK 15 (1982–2022) CT 15 (1993–2024) IA 15 (1982–2026) ND 14 (1993–2024) OK 13 (1987–2014) HI 10 (1996–2025) ID 10 (1992–2024) VT 9 (2005–2025) MT 9 (1993–2025) WV 9 (1984–2022) VI 8 (1998–2026) NE 7 (2015–2024) RI 7 (1998–2012) KS 7 (2010–2026) SD 6 (1994–2025) AR 3 (1979–2017) NH 2 (2015–2019) WY 2 (1999–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check