Your MCP token and copy-and-paste setup for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and the rest are on the install page — filled in with your real credentials while you are signed in.
Delete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant — emailed to you with setup instructions, and always available under that icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Terry v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2022The Court reasoned that this standard “was consistent with the established principle that a warrantless search should ‘be strictly circumscribed by the exigencies which justify its initiation[,]’ ” id. ¶ 14 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 26 (1968)), and “provide[s] sufficient latitude in allowing searches incident to arrest where they can be justified on principle, while refusing to broaden exceptions to New Mexico’s constitutional warrant requirement beyond their own justifications.” Id. ¶ 23. 2022The Court reasoned that this standard “was consistent with the established principle that a warrantless search should ‘be strictly circumscribed by the exigencies which justify its initiation[,]’ ” id. ¶ 14 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 26 (1968)), and “provide[s] sufficient latitude in allowing searches incident to arrest where they can be justified on principle, while refusing to broaden exceptions to New Mexico’s constitutional warrant requirement beyond their own justifications.” Id. ¶ 23. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Garciagreen2 sentences2006See generally Rule 11-103(A)(2) NMRA; State v. Garcia, 100 N.M. 120, 123 , 666 P.2d 1267, 1270 (Ct.App.1983) (concluding that the defendant failed to make an offer of proof as required in order to preserve an issue of whether the district court properly excluded testimony). 2006See generally Rule 11-103(A)(2) NMRA; State v. Garcia, 100 N.M. 120, 123 , 666 P.2d 1267, 1270 (Ct.App.1983) (concluding that the defendant failed to make an offer of proof as required in order to preserve an issue of whether the district court properly excluded testimony). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pennsylvania v. Muniz
green
2 sentences2011The Court reasoned that the privilege against self-incrimination “is a bar against compelling communications or testimony, but that compulsion which makes a suspect or accused the source of real or physical evidence does not violate it.” Id. at 591 , 110 S.Ct. 2638 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 2011The Court reasoned that the privilege against self-incrimination “is a bar against compelling communications or testimony, but that compulsion which makes a suspect or accused the source of real or physical evidence does not violate it.” Id. at 591 , 110 S.Ct. 2638 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
South Dakota v. Neville
green
2 sentences1997Id. at 566 , 103 S.Ct. at 924 . 5. 1997Id. at 566 , 103 S.Ct. at 924 . 5. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Buffett v. Jaramillo
green
1 sentence1996Buffett, at 530-531, 914 P.2d at 1027-1028 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
cluster 279393
green
1 sentence1979Aimcee, supra. The rationale for this principle is well-stated in American Safety Equipment, supra. The court reasoned that a claim under the antitrust laws is not merely a private matter. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Turnbow
green
2 sentences1979State v. Turnbow, 67 N.M. 241 , 354 P.2d 533 , 89 A.L.R.2d 461 (1960) states the better reasoned rule to be: Involuntary confessions of accused persons are inadmissible to impeach them as witnesses on the same ground that hearsay and all other incompetent evidence is inadmissible to impeach other witnesses, because they are unworthy of belief. 1979State v. Turnbow, 67 N.M. 241 , 354 P.2d 533 , 89 A.L.R.2d 461 (1960) states the better reasoned rule to be: Involuntary confessions of accused persons are inadmissible to impeach them as witnesses on the same ground that hearsay and all other incompetent evidence is inadmissible to impeach other witnesses, because they are unworthy of belief. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.