Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harris v. New Yorkgreen2 sentences2016V. 15 The Court reasoned that a privilege against self-incrimination is exercised when an accused decides whether to testify;" [e]very criminal defendant is privileged to testify in his own defense, or to refuse to do so." Rock, 483 U.S. at 53 (quoting Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 230 (1971)). ¶ 23. 2016V.15 The Court reasoned that a privilege against self-incrimination is exercised when an accused decides whether to testify; "[e]very criminal defendant is privileged to testify in his own defense, or to refuse to do so." Rock, 483 U.S. at 53 (quoting Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 230 (1971)). ¶23 Second, a criminal defendant's right to testify is located in the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. | 2 | 2 |
Wiggins v. Smith, Wardengreen1 sentence2025See Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510, 534 (2003); Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶51 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Minkgreen1 sentence2023See Mink, 146 Wis. 2d at 16-17 . ¶17 We also conclude the circuit court’s application of Sullivan was an appropriate exercise of discretion.5 Koenig concedes that the evidence was admitted for a proper purpose other than as propensity evidence. | 1 | 1 |
Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeatesgreen2 sentences2009See Yeates, 584 F.3d at 871 . ¶ 41. 2009See Yeates, 584 F.3d at 871 . ¶ 41 In Yeates , addressing a factual scenario similar to our own, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, held that: the MCS-90 endorsement only applies where: (1) the underlying insurance policy to which the endorsement is attached does not provide coverage for the motor carrier's accident, and (2) the motor carrier's insurance coverage is either not sufficient to satisfy the federally-prescribed minimum levels of financial responsibility or is non-existent. | 1 | 1 |
Hospital Consultants, Inc. v. Potykagreen2 sentences2002The court reasoned that the clause was not unreasonable because it did not include physicians employed by Webb who had never actually worked at the hospital, (distinguishing Hospital Consultants, Inc. v. Potyka, 531 S.W.2d 657, 665 (Tex. Civ. 2002The court reasoned that the clause was not unreasonable because it did not include physicians employed by Webb who had never actually worked at the hospital. (distinguishing Hospital Consultants, Inc. v. Potyka, 531 S.W.2d 657, 665 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. Romeogreen1 sentence1996The Court reasoned that this standard was appropriate because "[pjersons who have been involuntarily committed are entitled to more considerate treatment and conditions of confinement than criminals whose conditions of confinement are designed to punish." Id. at 321-22 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rock v. Arkansas
green
2 sentences2016V. 15 The Court reasoned that a privilege against self-incrimination is exercised when an accused decides whether to testify;" [e]very criminal defendant is privileged to testify in his own defense, or to refuse to do so." Rock, 483 U.S. at 53 (quoting Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 230 (1971)). ¶ 23. 2016V.15 The Court reasoned that a privilege against self-incrimination is exercised when an accused decides whether to testify; "[e]very criminal defendant is privileged to testify in his own defense, or to refuse to do so." Rock, 483 U.S. at 53 (quoting Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 230 (1971)). ¶23 Second, a criminal defendant's right to testify is located in the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Waldschimdt v. Appleton Investment Co. (In Re Zienel Furniture, Inc.)
green
2 sentences2009We conclude that this is the better reasoned analysis as it comports with the legislature's intent to compensate the landlord up until the date of the receivership petition "while not permitting a claim so large as to prevent other general unsecured creditors from recovering a dividend." Zienel Furniture, 13 B.R. at 266 . 2009We conclude that this is the better reasoned analysis as it comports with the legislature's intent to compensate the landlord up until the date of the receivership petition "while not permitting a claim so large as to prevent other general unsecured creditors from recovering a dividend." Zienel Furniture, 13 B.R. at 266 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Thiel
green
1 sentence2025See Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510, 534 (2003); Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶51 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Burkhalter v. State
green
1 sentence2019Burkhalter , 52 Wis. 2d at 422 . ¶5 Here, Crawford was well aware of the dates of the alleged conduct underlying the charge because the original complaint, the information, and the preliminary hearing testimony all put him on notice. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. Sokolowski
green
2 sentences2010Those matters are, however, incapable of resolution on summary judgment because the evidence in the Record does not lead to only one conclusion, see Fuller, 159 Wis. 2d at 329 , 464 N.W.2d at 100 , and we need a full exposition of the facts at a trial for a reasoned analysis, see Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. Sokolowski, 2006 WI 103, ¶ 49 , 294 Wis. 2d 274, 307 , 717 N.W.2d 781, 798 . 2010Those matters are, however, incapable of resolution on summary judgment because the evidence in the Record does not lead to only one conclusion, see Fuller, 159 Wis. 2d at 329 , 464 N.W.2d at 100 , and we need a full exposition of the facts at a trial for a reasoned analysis, see Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. Sokolowski, 2006 WI 103, ¶ 49 , 294 Wis. 2d 274, 307 , 717 N.W.2d 781, 798 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Fuller v. Riedel
green
2 sentences2010Those matters are, however, incapable of resolution on summary judgment because the evidence in the Record does not lead to only one conclusion, see Fuller, 159 Wis. 2d at 329 , 464 N.W.2d at 100 , and we need a full exposition of the facts at a trial for a reasoned analysis, see Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. Sokolowski, 2006 WI 103, ¶ 49 , 294 Wis. 2d 274, 307 , 717 N.W.2d 781, 798 . 2010Those matters are, however, incapable of resolution on summary judgment because the evidence in the Record does not lead to only one conclusion, see Fuller, 159 Wis. 2d at 329 , 464 N.W.2d at 100 , and we need a full exposition of the facts at a trial for a reasoned analysis, see Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. Sokolowski, 2006 WI 103, ¶ 49 , 294 Wis. 2d 274, 307 , 717 N.W.2d 781, 798 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School District
green
1 sentence2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Perkins
green
2 sentences2005Whether the acts underlying the December, 2002, domestic-abuse injunction are admissible turns on whether they are relevant: (1) to a prediction of what Hoffart would do to Wittig if the domestic-abuse injunction were not granted, and (2) to whether Hoffart's post-April 18, 2003, threats against Wittig *363 were "true threats" as that phrase is delineated by State v. Perkins, 2001 WI 46, ¶ 29 , 243 Wis. 2d 141, 158-159 , 626 N.W.2d 762, 770 , which we discuss in part B below. ¶ 11. 2005Whether the acts underlying the December, 2002, domestic-abuse injunction are admissible turns on whether they are relevant: (1) to a prediction of what Hoffart would do to Wittig if the domestic-abuse injunction were not granted, and (2) to whether Hoffart's post-April 18, 2003, threats against Wittig *363 were "true threats" as that phrase is delineated by State v. Perkins, 2001 WI 46, ¶ 29 , 243 Wis. 2d 141, 158-159 , 626 N.W.2d 762, 770 , which we discuss in part B below. ¶ 11. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Town of Delavan v. City of Delavan
green
1 sentence2003The court reasoned that our rule of "complete finality" unnecessarily restricted a flexible application of the rule and had the potential to "paralyze the legal process so as to delay subsequent actions years into the future." Id. at 535 , 500 N.W.2d at 275 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Fahrenberg v. Tengel
green
2 sentences1997Fahrenberg v. Tengel, 96 Wis. 2d 211, 230 , 291 N.W.2d 516 (1980). 1997Fahrenberg v. Tengel, 96 Wis. 2d 211, 230 , 291 N.W.2d 516 (1980). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Fletcher v. Weir
green
1 sentence1987Id. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.