need rule (South Carolina) · Go Syfert
← South Carolina issues

need rule in South Carolina

8 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.green
sc · 1999 · cited in 7 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2007–2010
2 sentences

2010See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613 , 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (holding that the Court need not rule on remaining issues when the disposition of prior issues is dispositive). [3] The test for reliability for expert testimony does not lend itself to a one-size-fits-all approach.

2010See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613 , 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (holding that the Court need not rule on remaining issues when the disposition of prior issues is dispositive). [3] The test for reliability for expert testimony does not lend itself to a one-size-fits-all approach.

77
Sorensen v. Allredgreen
calctapp · 1980 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011We apply an old axiom, “when the need for a rule ceases the rule ceases.” *293 Sorensen v. Allred, 112 Cal.App.3d 717 , 169 Cal.Rptr. 441, 446 (1980).

2011We apply an old axiom, “when the need for a rule ceases the rule ceases.” *293 Sorensen v. Allred, 112 Cal.App.3d 717 , 169 Cal.Rptr. 441, 446 (1980).

11
State v. Whitegreen
sc · 2009 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010See White, 382 S.C. at 274 , 676 S.E.2d at 688 (holding that the Council factors provided no useful analytical framework to evaluate the reliability of expert dog tracking evidence).

2010See White, 382 S.C. at 274 , 676 S.E.2d at 688 (holding that the Council factors provided no useful analytical framework to evaluate the reliability of expert dog tracking evidence).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Martel v. Montana Power Co. green
mont · 1988
2 sentences

2011In Martel v. Montana Power Co., 231 Mont. 96 , 752 P.2d 140 (1988), the Supreme Court of Montana overruled a prior decision that held willful and wanton conduct was distinguishable from “mere negligence” and that comparative negligence was not applicable when the defendant’s conduct was willful and wanton.

2011In Martel v. Montana Power Co., 231 Mont. 96 , 752 P.2d 140 (1988), the Supreme Court of Montana overruled a prior decision that held willful and wanton conduct was distinguishable from “mere negligence” and that comparative negligence was not applicable when the defendant’s conduct was willful and wanton.

12011–2011

Where else courts name it

NY 128 (1919–2026) CA 103 (1953–2025) TX 87 (1978–2025) IL 67 (1955–2025) OH 50 (1988–2026) LA 49 (1956–2023) NJ 49 (1960–2026) FL 45 (1973–2019) PA 43 (1951–2024) CT 35 (1973–2024) MI 30 (1970–2025) DC 29 (1978–2024) MA 29 (1895–2025) IN 24 (1976–2020) OR 23 (1985–2025) WA 22 (1944–2025) MO 21 (1982–2024) CO 21 (1984–2025) MD 19 (1988–2024) IA 19 (1960–2025) WI 18 (1975–2023) TN 16 (1978–2024) NM 15 (1980–2023) NC 14 (1982–2025) DE 13 (1990–2025) AZ 13 (1968–2024) KS 12 (1980–2025) ID 11 (1972–2021) MS 9 (1980–2017) WV 9 (1975–2017) VA 9 (1967–2013) AK 9 (1982–2025) NH 9 (1979–2018) AL 9 (1994–2016) GA 9 (1925–2025) RI 8 (1979–2010) SC 8 (2007–2011) ME 8 (1978–2025) MN 7 (1966–2024) UT 7 (1995–2022) KY 7 (1985–2025) HI 6 (2000–2020) WY 6 (1966–2006) VT 5 (1991–2018) OK 5 (1988–2023) NE 4 (1998–2022) NV 4 (2016–2017) MT 4 (1989–2015) AR 4 (1982–2020) SD 2 (2005–2025) ND 2 (1979–1983)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check