kind inquiry (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

kind inquiry in Idaho

7 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1901–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Seversongreen
idaho · 2009 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2015–2019
2 sentences

2015E.g., Severson, 147 Idaho at 704 , 215 P.3d at 424 (describing that, following a timely objection, a district court must “determine whether a conflict actually exists” after a thorough and searching inquiry); Lippert II, 152 Idaho at 887 , 276 P.3d at 759 (explaining that the court “must make some reasonable, nonsuggestive efforts to determine the nature of the defendant’s complaints”). 9 The court must make the kind of inquiry that might ease the defendant’s dissatisfaction, distrust, or concern.

2015E.g., Severson, 147 Idaho at 704 , 215 P.3d at 424 (describing that, following a timely objection, a district court must “determine whether a conflict actually exists” after a thorough and searching inquiry); Lippert II, 152 Idaho at 887 , 276 P.3d at 759 (explaining that the court “must make some reasonable, nonsuggestive efforts to determine the nature of the defendant’s complaints”). 9 The court must make the kind of inquiry that might ease the defendant’s dissatisfaction, distrust, or concern.

22
State v. Lippertgreen
idahoctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015E.g., Severson, 147 Idaho at 704 , 215 P.3d at 424 (describing that, following a timely objection, a district court must “determine whether a conflict actually exists” after a thorough and searching inquiry); Lippert II, 152 Idaho at 887 , 276 P.3d at 759 (explaining that the court “must make some reasonable, nonsuggestive efforts to determine the nature of the defendant’s complaints”). 9 The court must make the kind of inquiry that might ease the defendant’s dissatisfaction, distrust, or concern.

2015E.g., Severson, 147 Idaho at 704 , 215 P.3d at 424 (describing that, following a timely objection, a district court must “determine whether a conflict actually exists” after a thorough and searching inquiry); Lippert II, 152 Idaho at 887 , 276 P.3d at 759 (explaining that the court “must make some reasonable, nonsuggestive efforts to determine the nature of the defendant’s complaints”). 9 The court must make the kind of inquiry that might ease the defendant’s dissatisfaction, distrust, or concern.

11
Whitmire v. H. K. Ferguson Co.green
calctapp · 1968 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011Ferguson Co., 261 Cal. App.2d 594 , 68 Cal.Rptr. 78, 82 (1968) (refusing to invalidate an agreement in which a construction subcontractor indemnified the general contractor for its negligence). [10] The Dissent argues that exhaustion clauses do indeed have a legitimate purpose, stating that our opinion today simply indulges in "a belief in a grand conspiracy among evil insurance companies." This assertion is hyperbole, as exhaustion clauses are only a matter between one insurer and its insured—we need not find a "conspiracy" to hold that this kind of clause violates public policy.

2011Ferguson Co., 261 Cal. App.2d 594 , 68 Cal.Rptr. 78, 82 (1968) (refusing to invalidate an agreement in which a construction subcontractor indemnified the general contractor for its negligence). [10] The Dissent argues that exhaustion clauses do indeed have a legitimate purpose, stating that our opinion today simply indulges in "a belief in a grand conspiracy among evil insurance companies." This assertion is hyperbole, as exhaustion clauses are only a matter between one insurer and its insured—we need not find a "conspiracy" to hold that this kind of clause violates public policy.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Hurrell-Harring v. State green
nyappdiv · 2014
1 sentence

2021Hurrell-Harring, 119 A.D.3d at 1053 . d.

12021–2021
Michael Lee Smith v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction green
ca8 · 1991
2 sentences

2009The court “must make the kind of inquiry that might ease the defendant’s dissatisfaction, distrust, or concern.” Smith, 923 F.2d at 1320 .

2009The court "must make the kind of inquiry that might ease the defendant's dissatisfaction, distrust, or concern." Smith, 923 F.2d at 1320 .

12009–2009
Howes v. Newcomb green
mass · 1888
2 sentences

1930In Howes v. Newcomb, 146 Mass. 76 , 15 N. E. 123, 125 , the court said: “Undoubtedly an implied consent will answer the requirements of the law, and in every case of this kind the inquiry is whether such implied consent is found.

1930In Howes v. Newcomb, 146 Mass. 76 , 15 N. E. 123, 125 , the court said: “Undoubtedly an implied consent will answer the requirements of the law, and in every case of this kind the inquiry is whether such implied consent is found.

11930–1930
Wooddy v. Jamieson neutral
idaho · 1895
1 sentence

1901(Parker v. Beagle, 4 Idaho, 453 , 40 Pac. 61 ; Lowe v. Turner, 1 Idaho, 108 ; Hazard v. Cole, 1 Idaho, 276 ; Investment Co. v. Curtis, 5 Idaho, 652 , 51 Pac. 767 .) As heretofore shown, there was no attack upon the judgment rendered in the action brought by the Salt Lake Milling and Elevator Company by the defendants in their answer.

11901–1901
Parker v. Beagle neutral
idaho · 1895
1 sentence

1901(Parker v. Beagle, 4 Idaho, 453 , 40 Pac. 61 ; Lowe v. Turner, 1 Idaho, 108 ; Hazard v. Cole, 1 Idaho, 276 ; Investment Co. v. Curtis, 5 Idaho, 652 , 51 Pac. 767 .) As heretofore shown, there was no attack upon the judgment rendered in the action brought by the Salt Lake Milling and Elevator Company by the defendants in their answer.

11901–1901
Bunnell & Eno Investment Co. v. Curtis green
idaho · 1897
2 sentences

1901(Parker v. Beagle, 4 Idaho, 453 , 40 Pac. 61 ; Lowe v. Turner, 1 Idaho, 108 ; Hazard v. Cole, 1 Idaho, 276 ; Investment Co. v. Curtis, 5 Idaho, 652 , 51 Pac. 767 .) As heretofore shown, there was no attack upon the judgment rendered in the action brought by the Salt Lake Milling and Elevator Company by the defendants in their answer.

1901(Parker v. Beagle, 4 Idaho, 453 , 40 Pac. 61 ; Lowe v. Turner, 1 Idaho, 108 ; Hazard v. Cole, 1 Idaho, 276 ; Investment Co. v. Curtis, 5 Idaho, 652 , 51 Pac. 767 .) As heretofore shown, there was no attack upon the judgment rendered in the action brought by the Salt Lake Milling and Elevator Company by the defendants in their answer.

11901–1901
Hazard v. Cole neutral
idaho · 1869
1 sentence

1901(Parker v. Beagle, 4 Idaho, 453 , 40 Pac. 61 ; Lowe v. Turner, 1 Idaho, 108 ; Hazard v. Cole, 1 Idaho, 276 ; Investment Co. v. Curtis, 5 Idaho, 652 , 51 Pac. 767 .) As heretofore shown, there was no attack upon the judgment rendered in the action brought by the Salt Lake Milling and Elevator Company by the defendants in their answer.

11901–1901

Where else courts name it

TX 122 (1908–2025) CA 104 (1924–2026) IL 88 (1885–2026) OR 71 (1908–2024) NC 54 (1895–2026) NY 44 (1888–2026) DC 41 (1974–2018) FL 36 (1969–2024) IN 33 (1973–2023) NJ 32 (1948–2022) WA 30 (1909–2026) OH 28 (1944–2023) MO 28 (1886–2020) CT 27 (1948–2021) AR 27 (1893–2026) GA 23 (1933–2024) MI 20 (1919–2025) UT 20 (1932–2025) PA 19 (1830–2025) MN 19 (1916–2015) MA 17 (1930–2018) CO 16 (1914–2024) IA 16 (1902–2021) KS 15 (1873–2025) MS 15 (1970–2023) LA 14 (1926–2012) NM 13 (1995–2024) VT 11 (1918–2025) WI 11 (1975–2025) AL 9 (1954–2016) AZ 9 (1936–2009) KY 9 (1905–2025) MD 8 (1881–2001) NH 8 (1975–2023) HI 8 (1981–2025) NE 7 (1886–2003) ID 7 (1901–2021) TN 7 (1901–2022) OK 6 (1913–2013) AK 5 (1980–2022) VA 5 (2007–2024) DE 4 (1972–2018) MT 4 (2006–2014) NV 4 (1966–1995) ME 4 (1980–2020) SC 4 (1963–1997) WY 3 (2003–2024) RI 3 (1976–1992) SD 3 (1957–2008) ND 2 (1998–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check