Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1901–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bell v. Conegreen1 sentence2022See Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 697-98 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
Rekab, Inc. v. Frank Hrubetz & Co.green2 sentences2008See, e.g., Rekab, Inc. v. Frank Hrubetz & Co., 261 Md. 141 , 274 A.2d 107 (1971); Comstock, 99 N.W.2d at 634 ; Cover, 473 N.Y.S.2d 378 , 461 N.E.2d at 871 ; Kozlowski v. John E. 2008See, e.g., Rekab, Inc. v. Frank Hrubetz & Co., 261 Md. 141 , 274 A.2d 107 (1971); Comstock, 99 N.W.2d at 634 ; Cover, 473 N.Y.S.2d 378 , 461 N.E.2d at 871 ; Kozlowski v. John E. | 1 | 1 |
Mahler v. Ebygreen2 sentences1994See Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1, 16 , 61 S.Ct. 422, 427 , 85 L.Ed. 479, 486 (1941); Kessler v. Strecker, 307 U.S. 22, 34 , 59 S.Ct. 694, 700 , 83 L.Ed. 1082, 1090 (1939); Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 45 , 44 S.Ct. 283, 288 , 68 L.Ed. 549, 557 (1924); Medic Ambulance Serv. 1994See Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1, 16 , 61 S.Ct. 422, 427 , 85 L.Ed. 479, 486 (1941); Kessler v. Strecker, 307 U.S. 22, 34 , 59 S.Ct. 694, 700 , 83 L.Ed. 1082, 1090 (1939); Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 45 , 44 S.Ct. 283, 288 , 68 L.Ed. 549, 557 (1924); Medic Ambulance Serv. | 1 | 1 |
Kessler v. Streckergreen2 sentences1994See Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1, 16 , 61 S.Ct. 422, 427 , 85 L.Ed. 479, 486 (1941); Kessler v. Strecker, 307 U.S. 22, 34 , 59 S.Ct. 694, 700 , 83 L.Ed. 1082, 1090 (1939); Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 45 , 44 S.Ct. 283, 288 , 68 L.Ed. 549, 557 (1924); Medic Ambulance Serv. 1994See Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1, 16 , 61 S.Ct. 422, 427 , 85 L.Ed. 479, 486 (1941); Kessler v. Strecker, 307 U.S. 22, 34 , 59 S.Ct. 694, 700 , 83 L.Ed. 1082, 1090 (1939); Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 45 , 44 S.Ct. 283, 288 , 68 L.Ed. 549, 557 (1924); Medic Ambulance Serv. | 1 | 1 |
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.green2 sentences1994See Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1, 16 , 61 S.Ct. 422, 427 , 85 L.Ed. 479, 486 (1941); Kessler v. Strecker, 307 U.S. 22, 34 , 59 S.Ct. 694, 700 , 83 L.Ed. 1082, 1090 (1939); Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 45 , 44 S.Ct. 283, 288 , 68 L.Ed. 549, 557 (1924); Medic Ambulance Serv. 1994See Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1, 16 , 61 S.Ct. 422, 427 , 85 L.Ed. 479, 486 (1941); Kessler v. Strecker, 307 U.S. 22, 34 , 59 S.Ct. 694, 700 , 83 L.Ed. 1082, 1090 (1939); Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 45 , 44 S.Ct. 283, 288 , 68 L.Ed. 549, 557 (1924); Medic Ambulance Serv. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.green2 sentences1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Atkinsongreen2 sentences1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Olanogreen2 sentences1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Younggreen2 sentences1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
M.M. v. L.M.
green
2 sentences2014In M.M. v. L.M., 55 A.3d 1167 (Pa. Super. 2014In M.M. v. L.M., 55 A.3d 1167 (Pa.Super.Ct.2012), a Pennsylvania divorce case, the father was diagnosed with bipolar personality disorder. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Comstock v. General Motors Corp.
green
1 sentence2008See, e.g., Rekab, Inc. v. Frank Hrubetz & Co., 261 Md. 141 , 274 A.2d 107 (1971); Comstock, 99 N.W.2d at 634 ; Cover, 473 N.Y.S.2d 378 , 461 N.E.2d at 871 ; Kozlowski v. John E. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Cover v. Cohen
green
2 sentences2008See, e.g., Rekab, Inc. v. Frank Hrubetz & Co., 261 Md. 141 , 274 A.2d 107 (1971); Comstock, 99 N.W.2d at 634 ; Cover, 473 N.Y.S.2d 378 , 461 N.E.2d at 871 ; Kozlowski v. John E. 2008See, e.g., Rekab, Inc. v. Frank Hrubetz & Co., 261 Md. 141 , 274 A.2d 107 (1971); Comstock, 99 N.W.2d at 634 ; Cover, 473 N.Y.S.2d 378 , 461 N.E.2d at 871 ; Kozlowski v. John E. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Milliken v. Bradley
green
2 sentences1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 1994See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1779 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508, 521-22 (1993) (‘‘[t]he presence of alternate jurors during jury deliberations is not the kind of error that ‘affect[s] substantial rights’ independent of its prejudicial impact”); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 16 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1, 13 (1985) ("the prosecutor’s remarks cannot be said to rise to the level of plain error”); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 , 738 n. 18, 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 3124 n. 18, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 , 1087 n. 18 (1974); United States v. Socony-Vacu-um Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 2 | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Haynes v. Locks
green
1 sentence1993See Schiavone; Haynes v. Locks, 711 F.Supp. 901 (E.D. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Commonwealth v. Sisson
green
2 sentences1960In Commonwealth v. Sisson, 189 Mass. 247 , 75 N.E. 619 , 1 L.R.S., N.S., 752, 109 Am. 1960In Commonwealth v. Sisson, 189 Mass. 247 , 75 N.E. 619 , 1 L.R.S., N.S., 752, 109 Am. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
State v. Scott
neutral
1 sentence1901Legislation making this exaction, like that laying a similar burden on interstate commerce (Robbins v. Taxing District, 120 U. S., 129 ; State v. Scott, 98 Tenn., 254 ), is repugnant to the federal Constitution, and, therefore, null and void. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.