Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1916–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberggreen2 sentences2015See Minn. Stat. § 645.27 ; Holmberg, 588 N.W.2d at 727 (concluding that the Marriage Dissolution Award of Attorney Fees statute, Minn. Stat. § 518.14 , subd. 1 (2014), does not apply to the State because there was no clear indication that the Legislature so intended). 2015See Minn.Stat. § 645.27; Holmberg, 588 N.W.2d at 727 (concluding that the Marriage Dissolution Award of Attorney Fees statute, Minn.Stat. § 518.14, subd. 1 (2014), does not apply to the State because there was no clear indication that the Legislature so intended). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Lindergreen2 sentences1987State v. Linder, 268 N.W.2d 734, 735 (Minn.1978) (determination of the voluntariness of a waiver involves “the same kind of inquiry basically that is made to determine whether a statement is ‘voluntary’ within the meaning of the traditional voluntariness requirement”). 1984Factors to be considered include age, maturity, intelligence, education, experience, ability to comprehend, lack of or adequacy of warnings, length and legality of detention, nature of interrogation, physical deprivations, limits on access to counsel and friends, and others. 268 N.W.2d at 735 (citations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Kimmelman v. Morrisongreen2 sentences2012See, e.g., Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 385 , 106 S.Ct. 2574 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986). 2012See, e.g., Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 385 , 106 S.Ct. 2574 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ashbygreen1 sentence2008State v. Ashby, 567 N.W.2d 21, 28 (Minn.1997). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. City of Minneapolisgreen1 sentence2007In other words, a property owner must demonstrate that a regulatory action resulted in “a 100% diminution in value.” Norman v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 231, 252 (Fed.Cl.2004), aff'd, 429 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302, 330 , 122 S.Ct. 1465 , 152 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002) (explaining that "the categorical rule would not apply if the diminution in value were 95% instead of 100%” and anything less than a total loss "would require the kind of analysis | 1 | 1 |
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agencygreen2 sentences2007In other words, a property owner must demonstrate that a regulatory action resulted in “a 100% diminution in value.” Norman v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 231, 252 (Fed.Cl.2004), aff'd, 429 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302, 330 , 122 S.Ct. 1465 , 152 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002) (explaining that "the categorical rule would not apply if the diminution in value were 95% instead of 100%” and anything less than a total loss "would require the kind of analysis 2007In other words, a property owner must demonstrate that a regulatory action resulted in “a 100% diminution in value.” Norman v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 231, 252 (Fed.Cl.2004), aff'd, 429 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302, 330 , 122 S.Ct. 1465 , 152 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002) (explaining that "the categorical rule would not apply if the diminution in value were 95% instead of 100%” and anything less than a total loss "would require the kind of analysis | 1 | 1 |
Norman v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2007In other words, a property owner must demonstrate that a regulatory action resulted in “a 100% diminution in value.” Norman v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 231, 252 (Fed.Cl.2004), aff'd, 429 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302, 330 , 122 S.Ct. 1465 , 152 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002) (explaining that "the categorical rule would not apply if the diminution in value were 95% instead of 100%” and anything less than a total loss "would require the kind of analysis | 1 | 1 |
Piepho v. Brunsgreen2 sentences2006In assessing timeliness challenges in candidate residency cases, we stated, “In considering laches, we have held that the practical question in each case is whether there has been such an unreasonable delay in asserting a known right, resulting in prejudice to others, as would make it inequitable to grant the relief prayed for.” Piepho v. Bruns, 652 N.W.2d 40, 43 (Minn.2002) (quoting Fetsch v. Holm, 236 Minn. 158, 163 , 52 N.W.2d 113, 115 (1952)). 2006In assessing timeliness challenges in candidate residency cases, we stated, "In considering laches, we have held that the practical question in each case is whether there has been such an unreasonable delay in asserting a known right, resulting in prejudice to others, as would make it inequitable to grant the relief prayed for." Piepho v. Bruns, 652 N.W.2d 40, 43 (Minn.2002) (quoting Fetsch v. Holm, 236 Minn. 158, 163 , 52 N.W.2d 113, 115 (1952)). | 1 | 1 |
Fetsch v. Holmgreen2 sentences2006In assessing timeliness challenges in candidate residency cases, we stated, “In considering laches, we have held that the practical question in each case is whether there has been such an unreasonable delay in asserting a known right, resulting in prejudice to others, as would make it inequitable to grant the relief prayed for.” Piepho v. Bruns, 652 N.W.2d 40, 43 (Minn.2002) (quoting Fetsch v. Holm, 236 Minn. 158, 163 , 52 N.W.2d 113, 115 (1952)). 2006In assessing timeliness challenges in candidate residency cases, we stated, “In considering laches, we have held that the practical question in each case is whether there has been such an unreasonable delay in asserting a known right, resulting in prejudice to others, as would make it inequitable to grant the relief prayed for.” Piepho v. Bruns, 652 N.W.2d 40, 43 (Minn.2002) (quoting Fetsch v. Holm, 236 Minn. 158, 163 , 52 N.W.2d 113, 115 (1952)). | 1 | 1 |
Moe v. Alsopgreen2 sentences2006We have explained that this kind of challenge to candidacy must be timely made: “An applicant for the order must proceed promptly in view of the inherent limitations upon adequate judicial consideration.” Moe v. Alsop, 288 Minn. 323, 331 , 180 N.W.2d 255, 260 (1970). 2006We have explained that this kind of challenge to candidacy must be timely made: “An applicant for the order must proceed promptly in view of the inherent limitations upon adequate judicial consideration.” Moe v. Alsop, 288 Minn. 323, 331 , 180 N.W.2d 255, 260 (1970). | 1 | 1 |
Collis v. City of Bloomingtongreen2 sentences1986Collis, 310 Minn. 5, 17-18 , 246 N.W.2d 19, 26 (emphasis added). 1986Collis, 310 Minn. 5, 17-18 , 246 N.W.2d 19, 26 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Carlsongreen1 sentence1979See, State v. Carlson, supra, holding that an instruction of this nature, while it was justified, may have misled the jury into believing that as a matter of law there was no merit to defendant’s theory of the case. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Idaho v. Wright
green
2 sentences1993ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Ruben James Salazar for further review of the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals affirming his criminal sexual conduct convictions be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals, which is instructed to engage in the kind of analysis contemplated by Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), articulating the circumstances surrounding the making of the out-of-court statements demonstrating the particular trust 1993ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Ruben James Salazar for further review of the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals affirming his criminal sexual conduct convictions be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals, which is instructed to engage in the kind of analysis contemplated by Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), articulating the circumstances surrounding the making of the out-of-court statements demonstrating the particular trust | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Washington v. State
green
1 sentence2014Washington, 845 N.W.2d at 214–15; State v. Borrego, 661 N.W.2d 663 , 666–67 (Minn. App. 2003). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Borrego
green
1 sentence2014Washington, 845 N.W.2d at 214–15; State v. Borrego, 661 N.W.2d 663 , 666–67 (Minn. App. 2003). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Brown
green
2 sentences2008His presence with the deliberating jury, even though he is not a judge, is precisely the kind of error that "call[s] into question the very accuracy and reliability of the trial process." See Brown, 732 N.W.2d at 630 (quoting Osborne, 715 N.W.2d at 448 n. 8). 2008His presence with the deliberating jury, even though he is not a judge, is precisely the kind of error that “call[sj into question the very accuracy and reliability of the trial process.” See Brown, 732 N.W.2d at 630 (quoting Osborne, 715 N.W.2d at 448 n. 8). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Osborne
green
2 sentences2008His presence with the deliberating jury, even though he is not a judge, is precisely the kind of error that "call[s] into question the very accuracy and reliability of the trial process." See Brown, 732 N.W.2d at 630 (quoting Osborne, 715 N.W.2d at 448 n. 8). 2008His presence with the deliberating jury, even though he is not a judge, is precisely the kind of error that “call[sj into question the very accuracy and reliability of the trial process.” See Brown, 732 N.W.2d at 630 (quoting Osborne, 715 N.W.2d at 448 n. 8). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Norman v. United States
green
2 sentences2007In other words, a property owner must demonstrate that a regulatory action resulted in “a 100% diminution in value.” Norman v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 231, 252 (Fed.Cl.2004), aff'd, 429 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302, 330 , 122 S.Ct. 1465 , 152 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002) (explaining that "the categorical rule would not apply if the diminution in value were 95% instead of 100%” and anything less than a total loss "would require the kind of analysis 2007In other words, a property owner must demonstrate that a regulatory action resulted in “a 100% diminution in value.” Norman v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 231, 252 (Fed.Cl.2004), aff'd, 429 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302, 330 , 122 S.Ct. 1465 , 152 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002) (explaining that "the categorical rule would not apply if the diminution in value were 95% instead of 100%” and anything less than a total loss "would require the kind of analysis | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Norman v. United States
green
1 sentence2007In other words, a property owner must demonstrate that a regulatory action resulted in “a 100% diminution in value.” Norman v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 231, 252 (Fed.Cl.2004), aff'd, 429 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302, 330 , 122 S.Ct. 1465 , 152 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002) (explaining that "the categorical rule would not apply if the diminution in value were 95% instead of 100%” and anything less than a total loss "would require the kind of analysis | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Zeman v. City of Minneapolis
green
1 sentence2007In other words, a property owner must demonstrate that a regulatory action resulted in “a 100% diminution in value.” Norman v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 231, 252 (Fed.Cl.2004), aff'd, 429 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302, 330 , 122 S.Ct. 1465 , 152 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002) (explaining that "the categorical rule would not apply if the diminution in value were 95% instead of 100%” and anything less than a total loss "would require the kind of analysis | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Arizona v. Youngblood
green
2 sentences2002In Youngblood , a case that dealt principally with the state’s failure to preserve semen samples in a prosecution for child molestation, sexual assault, and kidnapping, the Court also discussed the state’s failure to perform a particular kind of test on the samples. 488 U.S. at 58 , 109 S.Ct. 333 . 2002In Youngblood , a case that dealt principally with the state’s failure to preserve semen samples in a prosecution for child molestation, sexual assault, and kidnapping, the Court also discussed the state’s failure to perform a particular kind of test on the samples. 488 U.S. at 58 , 109 S.Ct. 333 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Wayte v. United States
green
2 sentences1994Wayte, 470 U.S. at 607 , 105 S.Ct. at 1530 . 1994Wayte, 470 U.S. at 607 , 105 S.Ct. at 1530 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Coleman v. Alabama
green
1 sentence1976Coleman v. Alabama, supra. And, as the hearing assumes increased importance and the procedures become more complex, the likelihood that it can be held promptly after arrest diminishes. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Saari v. Dunwoody Iron Mining Co.
neutral
2 sentences1969Co. 221 Minn. 95, 96 , 21 N. W. (2d) 94, 95 , we said: “We have often said that where the evidence is in conflict the findings of the industrial commission, if reasonably supported, are conclusive on review by this court. [Citations omitted.] And that, also, is the rule to apply where there is conflict in medical testimony. 1969Co. 221 Minn. 95, 96 , 21 N. W. (2d) 94, 95 , we said: “We have often said that where the evidence is in conflict the findings of the industrial commission, if reasonably supported, are conclusive on review by this court. [Citations omitted.] And that, also, is the rule to apply where there is conflict in medical testimony. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Pennington v. Hare
green
2 sentences1916Pennington v. Hare, 60 Minn. 146 , 62 N. W. 116 ; Elwell v. Comstock, 99 Minn. 261 , 109 N. W. 113, 698 , 7 L.R.A. 1916Pennington v. Hare, 60 Minn. 146 , 62 N. W. 116 ; Elwell v. Comstock, 99 Minn. 261 , 109 N. W. 113, 698 , 7 L.R.A. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Elwell v. Comstock
green
1 sentence1916Pennington v. Hare, 60 Minn. 146 , 62 N. W. 116 ; Elwell v. Comstock, 99 Minn. 261 , 109 N. W. 113, 698 , 7 L.R.A. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Lenz v. Chalamidas
green
1 sentence1916Pennington v. Hare, 60 Minn. 146 , 62 N. W. 116 ; Elwell v. Comstock, 99 Minn. 261 , 109 N. W. 113, 698 , 7 L.R.A. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.