7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re: The Petition for Expungement of Conviction Records of: B.S. v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2019See B.S. , 95 N.E.3d at 179 . [14] In using the 1995 Marion County conviction to support Hill's HVSO status, where that same conviction was also used as a predicate conviction to support Hill's habitual offender status in an earlier case, the trial court did not subject Hill to double jeopardy, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hill's motion to correct erroneous sentence. | 1 | 1 |
Travis Koontz v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2019See Koontz , 975 N.E.2d at 848 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hill v. State
green
2 sentences1980In analyzing the Hill test, we noted, “Crimes resulting from brooding and reflection as well as ‘impulse’ could then negate responsibility.” 252 Ind. at 615 , 251 N.E.2d at 437 . 1980In analyzing the Hill test, we noted, “Crimes resulting from brooding and reflection as well as ‘impulse’ could then negate responsibility.” 252 Ind. at 615 , 251 N.E.2d at 437 . | 2 | 1978–1980 |
United States v. Robert v. Spears
green
1 sentence2018Additionally, the State indicated in its memorandum in opposition of Hill's motion to dismiss "other relatives of the Defendant, also residing with Elnoria Stokes at the time of the murder, are available to testify, and have made statements that Defendant often went out during the week[.]" (App. Vol. III at 217.) Conclusion [21] We conclude Hill has not met the bar set by Spears and adopted by this court in Schiro : he has not shown Elnoria and James "would have testified and withstood cross-examination," Spears , 159 F.3d at 1085 , and that the jury would have found them credible. 8 Thus he h | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Van Cleave
green
2 sentences2014Thus, in Segura, our Supreme Court adopted the Hill standard for showing prejudice from ineffective assistance of counsel in a guilty-plea case where the alleged prejudice results from an error or omission that overlooked or impaired a defense: a showing of a reasonable probability of success at trial.2 See id. 2014Thus, in Segura, our Supreme Court adopted the Hill standard for showing prejudice from ineffective assistance of counsel in a guilty-plea case where the alleged prejudice results from an error or omission that overlooked or impaired a defense: a showing of a reasonable probability of success at trial.2 See id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Perez v. United States Steel Corp.
green
2 sentences1995Such testimony discredits Hill's claim that he is permanently unable to "carry on reasonable types of employment." See Perez, 428 N.E.2d at 215-16 . 1995Such testimony discredits Hill's claim that he is permanently unable to "carry on reasonable types of employment." See Perez, 428 N.E.2d at 215-16 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Norman v. Turkey Run Community School Corp.
green
2 sentences1993T.R. 56; Norman v. Turkey *1220 Run Community School Corp. (1980), 274 Ind. 310, 312 , 411 N.E.2d 614, 615 . 1993T.R. 56; Norman v. Turkey *1220 Run Community School Corp. (1980), 274 Ind. 310, 312 , 411 N.E.2d 614, 615 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.