Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1889–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mendezgreen2 sentences2026See State v. Mendez, 319 Kan. 718 , 730, 559 P.3d 792 (2024) (describing prudential review of unpreserved claims). 2026See State v. Mendez, 319 Kan. 718 , 730, 559 P.3d 792 (2024) (describing prudential review of unpreserved claims). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Spraguegreen2 sentences2020See State v. Sprague, 303 Kan. 418, 425 , 362 P.3d 828 (2015) ("When a litigant fails to adequately brief an issue it is deemed abandoned."). 6 WAS THERE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE DISTRICT COURT'S FINDING HILL VIOLATED THE TERMS OF HIS PROBATION BY POSSESSING A FIREARM? 2020See State v. Sprague, 303 Kan. 418, 425 , 362 P.3d 828 (2015) ("When a litigant fails to adequately brief an issue it is deemed abandoned."). 6 WAS THERE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE DISTRICT COURT'S FINDING HILL VIOLATED THE TERMS OF HIS PROBATION BY POSSESSING A FIREARM? | 1 | 1 |
Prager v. Kansas Dept. of Revenuegreen1 sentence2019Hill, 53 Kan. App. 2d at 196 ; see Prager, 271 Kan. at 34 (sovereign immunity not waived for alleged constitutional tort of depriving free speech because private persons cannot be liable for 21 constitutional torts). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bakergreen2 sentences2006In State v. Baker, 239 Kan. 403, 405, 409 , 720 P.2d 1112 (1986), a police officer, who was en route to an armed robbery, observed a car traveling in the opposite direction. 2006In State v. Baker, 239 Kan. 403, 405, 409 , 720 P.2d 1112 (1986), a police officer, who was en route to an armed robbery, observed a car traveling in the opposite direction. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Arculeogreen2 sentences2005See State v. Arculeo, 29 Kan. 2005See State v. Arculeo, 29 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
Rosenberg v. Rosenberggreen2 sentences2000The Anhalt court stated the custody decree was not a true judicial determination and was more akin to the award of custody in a default proceeding. 6 Kan. 2000The Anhalt court stated the custody decree was not a true judicial determination and was more akin to the award of custody in a default proceeding. 6 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stovall v. Stovall
neutral
2 sentences2000We extended the Hill doctrine to child support in Stovall v. Stovall, 10 Kan. 2000We extended the Hill doctrine to child support in Stovall v. Stovall, 10 Kan. | 2 | 1989–2000 |
State v. Hill
green
2 sentences1997The Hill court found that the district judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Hill’s motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds and that there was substantial competent evidence to support the district judge’s determination that Hill was not held in jail solely on the charges therein. 257 Kan. at 778 . 1997The Hill court found that the district judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Hill’s motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds and that there was substantial competent evidence to support the district judge’s determination that Hill was not held in jail solely on the charges therein. 257 Kan. at 778 . | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Hill v. State
green
1 sentence2019Hill, 53 Kan. App. 2d at 196 ; see Prager, 271 Kan. at 34 (sovereign immunity not waived for alleged constitutional tort of depriving free speech because private persons cannot be liable for 21 constitutional torts). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Voyles
green
2 sentences2007We respectfuEy conclude that in multiple acts cases, controEing case law requires that if, as here, it is determined that factuaEy separate incidents have been aEeged, failure to give a unanimity instruction must be deemed harmless if the defendant has presented a unified defense to aE of those acts.” (Emphasis added.) 34 Kan. 2007We respectfuEy conclude that in multiple acts cases, controEing case law requires that if, as here, it is determined that factuaEy separate incidents have been aEeged, failure to give a unanimity instruction must be deemed harmless if the defendant has presented a unified defense to aE of those acts.” (Emphasis added.) 34 Kan. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Kesselring
green
2 sentences2006However, more recently in State v. Kesselring, 279 Kan. 671 , 112 P.3d 175 (2005), this court identified a threshold analysis to a multiple acts analysis which incorporates part of the Hill test. 2006However, more recently in State v. Kesselring, 279 Kan. 671 , 112 P.3d 175 (2005), this court identified a threshold analysis to a multiple acts analysis which incorporates part of the Hill test. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Wellborn
green
2 sentences2004In announcing the proper framework for analyzing a trial court’s failure to give a unanimity instruction, the Hill court explicitly rejected the structural error approach previously advocated by such cases as State v. Wellborn, 27 Kan. 2004In announcing the proper framework for analyzing a trial court’s failure to give a unanimity instruction, the Hill court explicitly rejected the structural error approach previously advocated by such cases as State v. Wellborn, 27 Kan. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Warwick
green
2 sentences1993(Here, Clardy admits hitting Wright but denies any part in the robbery.) The Hill court first noted that in State v. Warwick, 232 Kan. 232 , 654 P.2d 403 (1982), using only a comparison of the statutory elements of the crimes, we held that battery and aggravated battery are not lesser included offenses of robbery or aggravated robbery. 1993(Here, Clardy admits hitting Wright but denies any part in the robbery.) The Hill court first noted that in State v. Warwick, 232 Kan. 232 , 654 P.2d 403 (1982), using only a comparison of the statutory elements of the crimes, we held that battery and aggravated battery are not lesser included offenses of robbery or aggravated robbery. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Anhalt v. Fesler
green
2 sentences1989App. 2d 921, 924 , 636 P.2d 224 (1981), the Court of Appeals extended the Hill doctrine to custody decrees entered upon written stipulation of the parties. 1989App. 2d 921, 924 , 636 P.2d 224 (1981), the Court of Appeals extended the Hill doctrine to custody decrees entered upon written stipulation of the parties. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
N. B. Brown & Co. v. Tuppeny
neutral
1 sentence1889And it can hardly be supposed that after all the proceedings of the justice’s court are taken by appeal to the district 00111.^ that any officer of the justice’s court will continue to have possession and control of the attached property.” In Brown v. Tuppeny, 24 Kas. 29 , Brown was summoned as a garnishee in an action pending before a justice of the peace, wherein Tuppeny was plaintiff and Hill defendant. | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.