Hill motion (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

Hill motion in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Latham green
washctapp · 2014
2 sentences

2018App. 390, 398 , 335 P.3d 960 (2014). 11 This citation is to the clerk's papers in No. 76942-1. 12 Note 8, supra. 5 No. 76945-6-1 The court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hill's motion to withdraw his pleas.

2018App. 390, 398 , 335 P.3d 960 (2014). 11 This citation is to the clerk's papers in No. 76942-1. 12 Note 8, supra. 5 No. 76944-8-1 The court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hill's motion to withdraw his pleas.

42018–2018
State v. Codiga green
wash · 2008
1 sentence

2018(Emphasis added) CP 112-13.3 The prosecutor reiterated these points at the hearing on Hill's motion, stating in part: 2 Citing State v. Codiga, 162 Wn.2d 912, 928 , 175 P.3d 1082 (2008)(citations omitted), the State argued below: The Defendant expressly, in writing and on the record in court, assumed the risk that additional criminal history could be found prior to sentencing.

12018–2018
State v. Codiga green
wash · 2008
1 sentence

2018(Emphasis added) CP 112-13.3 The prosecutor reiterated these points at the hearing on Hill's motion, stating in part: 2 Citing State v. Codiga, 162 Wn.2d 912, 928 , 175 P.3d 1082 (2008)(citations omitted), the State argued below: The Defendant expressly, in writing and on the record in court, assumed the risk that additional criminal history could be found prior to sentencing.

12018–2018
State v. Downing green
wash · 2004
1 sentence

2014On April 16, 2012, the trial granted the State's motion for continuance over Hill's objection, finding good cause due to the unavailability ofthree witnesses (continuing trial date to May 22, 2012, expiration date of June 23, 2012). 2 CrR 3.3(b)(5). 3 State v. Downing, 151 Wn.2d 265, 272 , 87 P.3d 1169 (2004).

12014–2014
State v. Downing green
wash · 2004
1 sentence

2014On April 16, 2012, the trial granted the State's motion for continuance over Hill's objection, finding good cause due to the unavailability ofthree witnesses (continuing trial date to May 22, 2012, expiration date of June 23, 2012). 2 CrR 3.3(b)(5). 3 State v. Downing, 151 Wn.2d 265, 272 , 87 P.3d 1169 (2004).

12014–2014

Where else courts name it

TX 42 (1900–2026) CA 42 (1954–2026) GA 29 (1974–2026) FL 25 (1955–2025) MO 20 (1953–2025) OH 16 (1996–2026) PA 14 (1974–2025) TN 13 (1998–2016) KS 13 (1889–2020) IL 10 (1985–2025) MS 9 (1956–2017) NY 9 (2008–2026) AR 8 (1990–2019) CT 8 (1995–2017) DC 7 (1992–2011) IN 7 (1978–2019) IA 6 (1989–2021) NC 6 (1956–2017) LA 6 (1904–1997) WA 6 (2014–2018) NV 6 (1998–2021) WY 5 (1991–2025) MT 5 (2000–2018) AZ 5 (1931–2025) NJ 4 (2014–2020) MD 4 (1914–1997) AL 4 (1997–2015) UT 4 (1990–2005) CO 4 (1996–2026) VA 4 (2000–2023) MA 3 (1948–2001) SC 3 (1964–2011) WV 3 (1984–2017) NM 3 (1963–2016) NE 3 (2018–2021) WI 2 (2021–2024) ID 2 (2004–2020) MI 2 (1982–2025) KY 2 (2021–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check