Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lucas v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2016Lucas v. Jones, 2012 Ark. 365, at 9 , 423 S.W.3d 580, 585 (holding that when an appellant fails to obtain a specific ruling below, we do not consider that point on appeal). 3 While the heading of Hill’s brief on appeal states that she is appealing the circuit court’s best-interest finding, the body of her brief contains no argument on this point. 2016Lucas v. Jones, 2012 Ark. 365, at 9 , 423 S.W.3d 580, 585 (holding that when an appellant fails to obtain a specific ruling below, we do not consider that point on appeal). 3 While the heading of Hill’s brief on appeal states that she is appealing the circuit court’s best-interest finding, the body of her brief contains no argument on this point. | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Thomas v. State, 2014 Ark. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DeSoto Gathering Co. v. Hill (16-990)
green
2 sentences2017For the 3 reasons expressed in our opinion issued today in DeSoto Gathering Co., LLC v. Hill, 2017 Ark. 326 , we disagree with USAC’s arguments, and we affirm the circuit court’s dismissal. 2017Therefore, based on our standard of review, we find that the 10 Cite as 2017 Ark. 326 circuit court did not err in granting Hill’s motion to dismiss, and we affirm the circuit court. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Beverly Enterprises-Arkansas, Inc. v. Hillier
green
2 sentences2019Beverly Enters.-Ark., Inc. v. Hillier, 341 Ark. 1 , 14 S.W.3d 487 (2000). 2019Beverly Enters.-Ark., Inc. v. Hillier, 341 Ark. 1 , 14 S.W.3d 487 (2000). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Allstate Insurance v. Redman Homes, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2018In Allstate Insurance Co. v. Redman Homes, Inc. , 302 Ark. 335 , 789 S.W.2d 454 (1990), we held that the subsequent dismissal of the first suit before the circuit court determined the sufficiency of a motion to dismiss the second suit precluded the application of Rule 12(b)(8) because there was no longer any other action pending. 2018In Allstate Insurance Co. v. Redman Homes, Inc. , 302 Ark. 335 , 789 S.W.2d 454 (1990), we held that the subsequent dismissal of the first suit before the circuit court determined the sufficiency of a motion to dismiss the second suit precluded the application of Rule 12(b)(8) because there was no longer any other action pending. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Stephens Prod. Co. v. Bennett
green
1 sentence2017The court, relying on the court of appeals’ decision in Stephens Production Co. v. Bennett, 2015 Ark. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Hill v. State
green
1 sentence2005The court further noted that upon Hill’s objection, the circuit court responded that “the jury was entitled to understand the State’s interview and investigation techniques,” and that “the witness would have to stop short of bolstering the children’s testimony.” Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Hill v. Lockhart
green
2 sentences1990Hill, supra, 474 U.S. at 60 , 106 S.Ct. at 371 . 1990Hill, supra, 474 U.S. at 60 , 106 S.Ct. at 371 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.