Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1956–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Metcalf v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Thus, Mal-lette’s role at trial was not limited to standby counsel, and her involvement was more akin to one acting as “co-counsel.” See Metcalf v. State, 629 So.2d 558, 562 (Miss.1993) (noting that “hybrid representation” is a “middle ground” serving “to strike a balance between the right to counsel and the right to self-representation.”). 2012Thus, Mallette’s role at trial was not limited to standby counsel, and her involvement was more akin to one acting as “co-counsel.” See Metcalf v. State, 629 So. 2d 558, 562 (Miss. 1993) (noting that “hybrid representation” is a “middle ground” serving “to 16 strike a balance between the right to counsel and the right to self-representation.”). | 2 | 2 |
Brown v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-3-19(1)(a) (Supp. 2016) defines first-degree murder as “[t]he killing of a human being without the authority of law by any means or in any manner ... when done with deliberate design to effect the death of the person killed, or of any human being[.]” The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that: “(1) the defendant killed the victim; (2) without authority of law; and (3) with deliberate design to effect his death.” Brown v. State, 965 So.2d 1023, 1030 (¶ 27) (Miss. 2007) (quotations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
McCline v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See McMinn v. State, 867 So.2d 268, 270 (¶¶ 5-6) (Miss.Ct.App.2004); McCline v. State, 856 So.2d 556, 560 (¶¶ 18-20) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
McMinn v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See McMinn v. State, 867 So.2d 268, 270 (¶¶ 5-6) (Miss.Ct.App.2004); McCline v. State, 856 So.2d 556, 560 (¶¶ 18-20) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Brown v. State, 798 So.2d 481, 493 (¶ 14) (Miss.2001). | 1 | 1 |
Toliver v. General Motors Corp.green1 sentence1986Cf. Toliver v. General Motors Corp., 482 So.2d 213, 215 (Miss. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hill v. McDonough
green
2 sentences2016The Court further determined that “Hill’s challenge appears to leave the State free 8 to use an alternative lethal injection procedure . . .” and that “[u]nder these circumstances a grant of injunctive relief could not be seen as barring the execution of Hill’s sentence.” Id. at 580-81 . ¶19. 2016The Court further determined that “Hill’s challenge appears to leave the State free to use an alternative lethal injection procedure ...” and that “[u]nder these circumstances a grant of injunctive relief could not be seen as barring the execution of Hill’s sentence.” Id. at 580-81 , 126 S.Ct. 2096 . ¶ 19. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Walker v. State
green
1 sentence2003Walker v. State , 671 So.2d 581 , 587 (Miss. 1995). ¶ 44. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Richards v. Vaccaro
neutral
1 sentence1956Richards v. Vaccaro & Company, 67 Miss. 516 , 7 So. 506 ; Mississippi Valley Trust Company v. Brewer, 151 Miss. 170 , 117 So. 540 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. Brewer
neutral
2 sentences1956Richards v. Vaccaro & Company, 67 Miss. 516 , 7 So. 506 ; Mississippi Valley Trust Company v. Brewer, 151 Miss. 170 , 117 So. 540 . 1956Richards v. Vaccaro & Company, 67 Miss. 516 , 7 So. 506 ; Mississippi Valley Trust Company v. Brewer, 151 Miss. 170 , 117 So. 540 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.