suggested rule in Utah

2026And in the absence of any such evidence, we agree with the State that “painting a child victim as a liar—particularly in a sexual abuse case—can backfire at trial” and that this is a “risk that experienced trial counsel would recognize, but a lay defendant might not.” Counsel instead chose a strategy that called into question Ashley’s memories without accusing her of lying, and this approach allowed Counsel to humanize Ashley 20221106-CA 33 2026 UT App 20 State v. James without conceding guilt.

1991Fifty years later, in Colorado Department of Social Services v. Board of County Commissioners, 697 P.2d 1 (Colo.1985), the court was confronted with a legislative act requiring both the state and the counties to contribute revenues to finance public assistance.

1991The court suggested a test to be used for determining whether a purpose is state or local: “Is it for strictly county uses, for which the county or its inhabitants alone would benefit, or is it for a purpose in which the entire state is concerned or will benefit?” Id., 49 P.2d at 1011 .

1991The court suggested a test to be used for determining whether a purpose is state or local: “Is it for strictly county uses, for which the county or its inhabitants alone would benefit, or is it for a purpose in which the entire state is concerned or will benefit?” Id., 49 P.2d at 1011 .

1953Co. v. Keel, 25 Utah 96 , 69 P. 719 ; Peterson v. Wood, 71 Utah 77 , 262 P. 828 ; Wrathall v. Johnson, 86 Utah 50 , 40 P. 2d 755 ; Justesen v. Olsen, 86 Utah 158 , 40 P. 2d 802 ; see also Hutchins, Selected Problems in the Law of Water Rights in the West, pages 173 to 180, dealing with “Appropriations of Ground Water." Note that the cases which are cited are in accord with the above statement, but that the author suggests a contrary rule under the Utah law, which would be less favorable to appellants, also note our comment on those cases and the suggested rule in Hanson v. Salt Lake City, supr

1953Co. v. Keel, 25 Utah 96 , 69 P. 719 ; Peterson v. Wood, 71 Utah 77 , 262 P. 828 ; Wrathall v. Johnson, 86 Utah 50 , 40 P. 2d 755 ; Justesen v. Olsen, 86 Utah 158 , 40 P. 2d 802 ; see also Hutchins, Selected Problems in the Law of Water Rights in the West, pages 173 to 180, dealing with “Appropriations of Ground Water." Note that the cases which are cited are in accord with the above statement, but that the author suggests a contrary rule under the Utah law, which would be less favorable to appellants, also note our comment on those cases and the suggested rule in Hanson v. Salt Lake City, supr

1953Co. v. Keel, 25 Utah 96 , 69 P. 719 ; Peterson v. Wood, 71 Utah 77 , 262 P. 828 ; Wrathall v. Johnson, 86 Utah 50 , 40 P. 2d 755 ; Justesen v. Olsen, 86 Utah 158 , 40 P. 2d 802 ; see also Hutchins, Selected Problems in the Law of Water Rights in the West, pages 173 to 180, dealing with “Appropriations of Ground Water." Note that the cases which are cited are in accord with the above statement, but that the author suggests a contrary rule under the Utah law, which would be less favorable to appellants, also note our comment on those cases and the suggested rule in Hanson v. Salt Lake City, supr

1953Co. v. Keel, 25 Utah 96 , 69 P. 719 ; Peterson v. Wood, 71 Utah 77 , 262 P. 828 ; Wrathall v. Johnson, 86 Utah 50 , 40 P. 2d 755 ; Justesen v. Olsen, 86 Utah 158 , 40 P. 2d 802 ; see also Hutchins, Selected Problems in the Law of Water Rights in the West, pages 173 to 180, dealing with “Appropriations of Ground Water." Note that the cases which are cited are in accord with the above statement, but that the author suggests a contrary rule under the Utah law, which would be less favorable to appellants, also note our comment on those cases and the suggested rule in Hanson v. Salt Lake City, supr

1953Co. v. Keel, 25 Utah 96 , 69 P. 719 ; Peterson v. Wood, 71 Utah 77 , 262 P. 828 ; Wrathall v. Johnson, 86 Utah 50 , 40 P. 2d 755 ; Justesen v. Olsen, 86 Utah 158 , 40 P. 2d 802 ; see also Hutchins, Selected Problems in the Law of Water Rights in the West, pages 173 to 180, dealing with “Appropriations of Ground Water." Note that the cases which are cited are in accord with the above statement, but that the author suggests a contrary rule under the Utah law, which would be less favorable to appellants, also note our comment on those cases and the suggested rule in Hanson v. Salt Lake City, supr

1953Co. v. Keel, 25 Utah 96 , 69 P. 719 ; Peterson v. Wood, 71 Utah 77 , 262 P. 828 ; Wrathall v. Johnson, 86 Utah 50 , 40 P. 2d 755 ; Justesen v. Olsen, 86 Utah 158 , 40 P. 2d 802 ; see also Hutchins, Selected Problems in the Law of Water Rights in the West, pages 173 to 180, dealing with “Appropriations of Ground Water." Note that the cases which are cited are in accord with the above statement, but that the author suggests a contrary rule under the Utah law, which would be less favorable to appellants, also note our comment on those cases and the suggested rule in Hanson v. Salt Lake City, supr

1953Co. v. Keel, 25 Utah 96 , 69 P. 719 ; Peterson v. Wood, 71 Utah 77 , 262 P. 828 ; Wrathall v. Johnson, 86 Utah 50 , 40 P. 2d 755 ; Justesen v. Olsen, 86 Utah 158 , 40 P. 2d 802 ; see also Hutchins, Selected Problems in the Law of Water Rights in the West, pages 173 to 180, dealing with “Appropriations of Ground Water." Note that the cases which are cited are in accord with the above statement, but that the author suggests a contrary rule under the Utah law, which would be less favorable to appellants, also note our comment on those cases and the suggested rule in Hanson v. Salt Lake City, supr

1953Co. v. Keel, 25 Utah 96 , 69 P. 719 ; Peterson v. Wood, 71 Utah 77 , 262 P. 828 ; Wrathall v. Johnson, 86 Utah 50 , 40 P. 2d 755 ; Justesen v. Olsen, 86 Utah 158 , 40 P. 2d 802 ; see also Hutchins, Selected Problems in the Law of Water Rights in the West, pages 173 to 180, dealing with “Appropriations of Ground Water." Note that the cases which are cited are in accord with the above statement, but that the author suggests a contrary rule under the Utah law, which would be less favorable to appellants, also note our comment on those cases and the suggested rule in Hanson v. Salt Lake City, supr

1917It is therefore error to leave the case to the jury where the plaintiff has offered no evidence which indicates that other employers in the same business had promulgated any such rule, or that the suggested rule was necessary or practicable, or that the necessity and propriety of malting such rule was so obvious as to make the question one of common knowledge and experience. ’ ’ McCarty, District Judge, sitting in the ease of Fritz v. Electric Light Co., 18 Utah, 493 , 56 Pac. 90 , in speaking for this court, says: “There are certain kinds of employment where, on account of their nature, it be

1917It is therefore error to leave the case to the jury where the plaintiff has offered no evidence which indicates that other employers in the same business had promulgated any such rule, or that the suggested rule was necessary or practicable, or that the necessity and propriety of malting such rule was so obvious as to make the question one of common knowledge and experience. ’ ’ McCarty, District Judge, sitting in the ease of Fritz v. Electric Light Co., 18 Utah, 493 , 56 Pac. 90 , in speaking for this court, says: “There are certain kinds of employment where, on account of their nature, it be