6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1940–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Faustgreen2 sentences2001See State v. Faust, 237 Conn. 454, 473 , 678 A.2d 910 (1996). 2001See State v. Faust, 237 Conn. 454, 473 , 678 A.2d 910 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Corchadogreen2 sentences2000See State v. Corchado, 200 Conn. 453, 464 , 512 A.2d 183 (1986). 2000See State v. Corchado, 200 Conn. 453, 464 , 512 A.2d 183 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Commissioner of Correction
green
1 sentence2013The defendant fails to set forth a suggested standard of review or analysis of this claim. “[T]his court is not an advocate for any party . . . .” State v. Tocco, 120 Conn. App. 768, 786-87 , 993 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 917 , 996 A.2d 279 (2010). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
HEINONEN v. Mandracchia
green
1 sentence2013The defendant fails to set forth a suggested standard of review or analysis of this claim. “[T]his court is not an advocate for any party . . . .” State v. Tocco, 120 Conn. App. 768, 786-87 , 993 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 917 , 996 A.2d 279 (2010). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Tocco
green
2 sentences2013The defendant fails to set forth a suggested standard of review or analysis of this claim. “[T]his court is not an advocate for any party . . . .” State v. Tocco, 120 Conn. App. 768, 786-87 , 993 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 917 , 996 A.2d 279 (2010). 2013The defendant fails to set forth a suggested standard of review or analysis of this claim. “[T]his court is not an advocate for any party . . . .” State v. Tocco, 120 Conn. App. 768, 786-87 , 993 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 917 , 996 A.2d 279 (2010). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Parrott
green
1 sentence2012Id., 284 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Preston
green
2 sentences2009In the dispositional phase, [i]f a violation is found, a court must next determine whether probation should be revoked because the beneficial aspects of probation are no longer being served.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Preston, 286 Conn. 367, 375-76 , 944 A.2d 276 (2008). 3 We note that this case was tried to the court and that during the state’s case-in-chief, the court suggested hearing testimony as to the second phase rather than potentially having to call the witnesses back for another day of testimony. 2009In the dispositional phase, [i]f a violation is found, a court must next determine whether probation should be revoked because the beneficial aspects of probation are no longer being served.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Preston, 286 Conn. 367, 375-76 , 944 A.2d 276 (2008). 3 We note that this case was tried to the court and that during the state’s case-in-chief, the court suggested hearing testimony as to the second phase rather than potentially having to call the witnesses back for another day of testimony. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Crescent Creamery, Inc. v. Milk Control Board
green
1 sentence1940An attempt was made to have the decision in the Gardner case reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United States but the defendants’ appeals were summarily denied ( 305 U. S. 559 , 59 Sup. Ct. 90, 83 L. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.