Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bordenkircher v. Hayesgreen2 sentences1995Within the limits set by the legislature’s constitutionally valid definition of chargeable offenses, “the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation” so long as “the selection was [not] deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.” Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 456 , 82 S.Ct. 501, 506 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 [1962], Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 , 98 S.Ct. 663, 668-69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 604, 610-11 (1978). 1995Within the limits set by the legislature’s constitutionally valid definition of chargeable offenses, “the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation” so long as “the selection was [not] deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.” Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 456 , 82 S.Ct. 501, 506 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 [1962], Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 , 98 S.Ct. 663, 668-69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 604, 610-11 (1978). | 2 | 2 |
Crozier v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Crozier v. State, 882 P.2d 1230, 1235 (Wyo.1994). 'The impermissible motivation must be demonstrated by showing that the charge was deliberately based on an unjustifiable standard or designed to inhibit the exercise of a constitutional right by the accused." Id.") [¶4] Next, with regard to Appellant's complaints that allegedly inaccurate and improper information was considered at sentencing, he has not established that the district court relied on any of that information in passing sentence. 2006“The impermissible motivation must be demonstrated by showing that the charge was deliberately based on an unjustifiable standard or designed to inhibit the exercise of a constitutional right by the accused.” Id. | 1 | 4 |
Manes v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Manes v. State, 2004 WY 70, ¶ 9 , 92 P.3d 289, 292 (Wyo.2004); Sandoval v. State, 2009 WY 121, ¶ 11 , 217 P.3d 393, 396 (Wyo.2009). 2013Manes v. State, 2004 WY 70, ¶ 9 , 92 P.3d 289, 292 (Wyo.2004); Sandoval v. State, 2009 WY 121, ¶ 11 , 217 P.3d 393, 396 (Wyo.2009). | 1 | 1 |
Sandoval v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Manes v. State, 2004 WY 70, ¶ 9 , 92 P.3d 289, 292 (Wyo.2004); Sandoval v. State, 2009 WY 121, ¶ 11 , 217 P.3d 393, 396 (Wyo.2009). 2013Manes v. State, 2004 WY 70, ¶ 9 , 92 P.3d 289, 292 (Wyo.2004); Sandoval v. State, 2009 WY 121, ¶ 11 , 217 P.3d 393, 396 (Wyo.2009). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Oyler v. Boles
green
2 sentences1995Within the limits set by the legislature’s constitutionally valid definition of chargeable offenses, “the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation” so long as “the selection was [not] deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.” Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 456 , 82 S.Ct. 501, 506 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 [1962], Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 , 98 S.Ct. 663, 668-69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 604, 610-11 (1978). 1995Within the limits set by the legislature’s constitutionally valid definition of chargeable offenses, “the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation” so long as “the selection was [not] deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.” Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 456 , 82 S.Ct. 501, 506 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 [1962], Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 , 98 S.Ct. 663, 668-69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 604, 610-11 (1978). | 2 | 1990–1995 |
Misenheimer v. State
green
2 sentences2006Misenheimer, 2001 WY 65, ¶ 17 , 27 P.3d at 281 . 2006Misenheimer, 2001 WY 65, ¶ 17 , 27 P.3d at 281 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
United States v. Batchelder
green
2 sentences2003Prosecutorial discretion, the Supreme Court opined, is subject to constitutional constraints ( e.g., no selective enforcement based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.). 99 S.Ct. at 2205 . 2003Pros-ecutorial discretion, the Supreme Court opined, is subject to constitutional constraints {e.g., no selective enforcement based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.). 99 S.Ct. at 2205 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Gooden v. State
green
1 sentence1990In Gooden, 711 P.2d at 409-10 , this court recognized another aspect of the prosecutor’s power when it held that a criminal defendant has no constitutional right to any plea bargain with the prosecutor, nor to the reduction or dismissal of charges. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.