starting point analysis (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

starting point analysis in Colorado

6 Colorado opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
In re Attorney F.green
colo · 2012 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Since the presumptive sanctions for these instances of misconduct surely would not be disbarment, and the starting point in our analysis would thus remain the same, we find it unnecessary to identify a specific. presumptive sanction for these rule violations. , See ABA Standards 9.21 & 9.31. , - See In re Attorney F., 285 P.3d 322, 327 (Colo. 2012); In re Fischer, 89 P.3d 817, 822 (Colo. 2004) (finding that a hearing board had overemphasized the presumptive sanction and undervalued the importance of mitigating factors in determining the needs of the public). .

2015In re Attorney F., 285 P.3d at 327 (quoting In re Rosen, 198 P.3d 116, 121 (Colo.2008)). , - In re Olsen, 326 P.3d 1004, 1009 (Colo.2014). .

11
In re Olsengreen
colo · 2014 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015In re Attorney F., 285 P.3d at 327 (quoting In re Rosen, 198 P.3d 116, 121 (Colo.2008)). , - In re Olsen, 326 P.3d 1004, 1009 (Colo.2014). .

11
In Re Fischergreen
colo · 2004 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015Since the presumptive sanctions for these instances of misconduct surely would not be disbarment, and the starting point in our analysis would thus remain the same, we find it unnecessary to identify a specific. presumptive sanction for these rule violations. , See ABA Standards 9.21 & 9.31. , - See In re Attorney F., 285 P.3d 322, 327 (Colo. 2012); In re Fischer, 89 P.3d 817, 822 (Colo. 2004) (finding that a hearing board had overemphasized the presumptive sanction and undervalued the importance of mitigating factors in determining the needs of the public). .

11
In Re Rosengreen
colo · 2008 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015In re Attorney F., 285 P.3d at 327 (quoting In re Rosen, 198 P.3d 116, 121 (Colo.2008)). , - In re Olsen, 326 P.3d 1004, 1009 (Colo.2014). .

11
In Re Cardwellgreen
colo · 2002 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008The Hearing Board next looks to the Colorado Supreme Court's rationale in a case where they suspended a lawyer for three years for failing to disclose to the court that his client had previously been convicted of DWALI In re Cardwell, 50 P.3d 897, 901 (Colo.2002).

11
Chavez v. DIST. COURT FOR 17TH JUDICIAL DIST.green
colo · 1982 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999See id.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Spahmer v. Gullette green
colo · 2005
2 sentences

2006E.g., Spahmer, 113 P.3d at 162 .

2006E.g., Spahmer, 113 P.3d at 162 .

12006–2006
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Nissen green
colo · 1993
1 sentence

1997State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Nissen, 851 P.2d 165 (Colo.1993).

11997–1997
Anderson v. Lamm green
colo · 1978
2 sentences

1980MacManus v. Love , 179 Colo. 218 , 499 P.2d 609 (1972); Anderson v. Lamm , 195 Colo. 437 , 579 P.2d 620 (1978).

1980MacManus v. Love , 179 Colo. 218 , 499 P.2d 609 (1972); Anderson v. Lamm , 195 Colo. 437 , 579 P.2d 620 (1978).

11980–1980
Mac Manus v. Love green
colo · 1972
2 sentences

1980MacManus v. Love , 179 Colo. 218 , 499 P.2d 609 (1972); Anderson v. Lamm , 195 Colo. 437 , 579 P.2d 620 (1978).

1980MacManus v. Love , 179 Colo. 218 , 499 P.2d 609 (1972); Anderson v. Lamm , 195 Colo. 437 , 579 P.2d 620 (1978).

11980–1980

Where else courts name it

CA 83 (1980–2025) OH 81 (1981–2026) TX 63 (1976–2024) CT 60 (1982–2022) OR 50 (1971–2026) PA 33 (1948–2024) NY 31 (1975–2022) FL 29 (1981–2023) MA 28 (1977–2023) NJ 22 (1981–2024) IL 21 (1975–2024) MI 17 (1958–2024) MD 14 (1981–2021) IN 12 (1985–2020) AK 10 (1971–2023) NM 10 (1998–2024) MN 10 (1988–2024) WA 10 (1984–2017) WI 10 (1978–2019) GA 9 (1953–2021) UT 9 (1987–2024) LA 7 (2000–2021) AZ 7 (1990–2026) IA 7 (1990–2025) SC 7 (2000–2023) KS 7 (1978–2022) VA 7 (1999–2019) NC 7 (2000–2022) NE 6 (1991–2019) NH 6 (1996–2024) CO 6 (1980–2015) OK 5 (1947–2018) KY 5 (1995–2024) DC 5 (1975–1981) ID 5 (1971–2014) AL 4 (1982–2003) MO 4 (1982–1990) ME 4 (1979–2018) MT 3 (1977–2001) VT 3 (2012–2024) WY 3 (1989–2016) RI 3 (1997–2013) HI 3 (2000–2024) ND 2 (1989–1991) MS 2 (1999–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check