individualized inquiry (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

individualized inquiry in Missouri

6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony Nullgreen
iowa · 2013 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017It chose to apply those protections under article I, section 17 of the Iowa Constitution, which is a word-for-word identical analog of the Eighth Amendment, stating “Miller’s principles are fully applicable to a lengthy term-of-years sentence as was imposed in this case because an offender sentenced to a lengthy term-of-years sentence should not be worse off than an offender sentenced to life in prison without parole who has the benefit of an individualized hearing under Miller.” Id. at 72.

11
State v. Hartgreen
mo · 2013 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014The court continued that the “case must be remanded for re-sentencing using a process by which the sentencer can conduct the individualized analysis required by Miller and, on that basis, determine whether life without parole is a just and appropriate sentence for Hart under all the circumstances.” Id. at 238-39.

11
John Doe v. County Of Centregreen
ca3 · 2001 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012Evaluating a “direct threat” defense “involve[s] an individualized inquiry into the significance of the threat posed.” Doe v. County of Centre, PA, 242 F.3d 437, 449 (3d Cir.2001).

11
Romano v. Oklahomagreen
scotus · 1994 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997See Romano v. Oklahoma, 512 U.S. 1, 7 , 114 S.Ct. 2004, 2009 , 129 L.Ed.2d 1 (1994).

1997See Romano v. Oklahoma, 512 U.S. 1, 7 , 114 S.Ct. 2004, 2009 , 129 L.Ed.2d 1 (1994).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Celis-Garcia green
mo · 2011
1 sentence

2020Id. at 158-59 .

12020–2020
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Campbell green
scotus · 2003
2 sentences

2018For example, when the United States Supreme Court considered State Farm, 538 U.S. 408 , 123 S.Ct. 1513 , the $145 million punitive damage award was compared to the two plaintiffs' $1 million total compensatory damage award (Mr. and Mrs. Campbell were awarded $600,000 and $400,000, respectively).

2018For example, when the United States Supreme Court considered State Farm, 538 U.S. 408 , 123 S.Ct. 1513 , the $145 million punitive damage award was compared to the two plaintiffs' $1 million total compensatory damage award (Mr. and Mrs. Campbell were awarded $600,000 and $400,000, respectively).

12018–2018

Where else courts name it

WA 255 (1984–2026) CA 59 (2003–2026) IA 45 (1995–2025) MA 27 (1993–2025) IL 25 (1988–2025) FL 20 (1993–2026) TX 19 (2004–2025) OH 19 (1999–2022) SC 18 (2014–2026) SD 11 (2003–2026) OR 11 (2013–2024) CT 11 (1999–2025) AL 11 (2003–2011) AZ 10 (1985–2026) NM 9 (1997–2022) CO 8 (1987–2020) PA 8 (1989–2023) NY 8 (1976–2026) MO 6 (1997–2020) DC 6 (2001–2016) KY 6 (2018–2025) NC 5 (1988–2018) MS 5 (2001–2017) IN 4 (2010–2013) MD 4 (2005–2021) AK 4 (1996–2023) AR 4 (2009–2019) GA 4 (2014–2018) OK 4 (2003–2023) UT 4 (2002–2024) MI 4 (2007–2020) LA 3 (1997–2007) WI 3 (2015–2020) NJ 2 (1996–2020) WV 2 (2002–2023) NE 2 (2003–2016) WY 2 (1986–2014) HI 2 (2002–2004) DE 2 (2015–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check