Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Romerogreen2 sentences2002See People v. Romero, 745 P.2d 1003, 1016 (Colo.1987) (holding that the trial court must make an individualized inquiry in each case to determine whether the trial testimony of a witness who has been hypnotized will be sufficiently reliable to qualify for admission). 1987People v. Romero, 745 P.2d 1003 (Colo.1987). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Hartgreen1 sentence2014See State v. Hart, 404 S.W.3d 232, 238-39 (Mo.2013). ¶ 24 We acknowledge that the division in People v. Banks, 2012 COA 157 , — P.3d -(cert. granted June 24, 2013), reached a different result. | 1 | 1 |
Alperstein v. Three Lakes Water & Sanitation Districtgreen1 sentence2001See Alperstein v. Three Lakes Water & Sanitation District, 710 P.2d 1186 (Colo.App.1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hagos v. People
green
2 sentences2020Hagos v. People, 2012 CO 63, ¶ 9 , 288 P.3d 116 , 118–19. ¶57 As pertinent here, structural errors require reversal without an individualized analysis of how the errors impaired the reliability of the judgment of conviction. 2020Hagos v. People, 2012 CO 63, ¶ 9 , 288 P.3d 116 , 118–19. ¶57 As pertinent here, structural errors require reversal without an individualized analysis of how the errors impaired the reliability of the judgment of conviction. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Miller v. Alabama
green
1 sentence2015After Miller , sentencing courts must consider "how children are different, and how those differences counsel against irrevocably sentencing them to a lifetime in prison." Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Woodson v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1988The first of these requirements arose from Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 , 96 S.Ct. 2978 , 49 L.Ed.2d 944 (1976). 1988The first of these requirements arose from Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 , 96 S.Ct. 2978 , 49 L.Ed.2d 944 (1976). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
McCleskey v. Kemp
green
2 sentences1988In the cases decided after Gregg , the Supreme Court "has imposed a number of requirements on the capital sentencing process to ensure that capital sentencing decisions rest on the individualized inquiry contemplated in Gregg . " McCleskey v. Kemp, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 1756, 1772 , 95 L.Ed.2d 262 (1987). 1988In the cases decided after Gregg , the Supreme Court "has imposed a number of requirements on the capital sentencing process to ensure that capital sentencing decisions rest on the individualized inquiry contemplated in Gregg . " McCleskey v. Kemp, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 1756, 1772 , 95 L.Ed.2d 262 (1987). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Chester Lee Wicker v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of Corrections
green
2 sentences1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehyp-notic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. Iwak 1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehypnotic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. I | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Roger Lee McQueen v. Samuel P. Garrison Attorney General of North Carolina, Rufus Edmisten
green
2 sentences1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehyp-notic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. Iwak 1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehypnotic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. I | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Iwakiri
green
2 sentences1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehypnotic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. I 1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehypnotic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. I | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Hurd
green
2 sentences1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehypnotic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. I 1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehypnotic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. I | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Sireci v. Florida
green
2 sentences1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehyp-notic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. Iwak 1987Other courts have allowed witnesses to testify both to prehypnotic and posthypnotic recollections if the hypnosis was conducted in accordance with certain specific safeguards calculated to ensure the reliability of the hypnotic procedure, see, e.g., State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981), or if the trial court has made an individualized inquiry in each case and determined that the testimony is reliable, see, e.g., McQueen v. Garrison, 814 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1987); Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); State v. I | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.