Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re RWSgreen2 sentences2014In re Staley, 67 Ill.2d 33 , 7 Ill.Dec. 85 , 364 N.E.2d 72, 73-74 (1977) (“In the absence of ... a showing [of necessity] ... an accused cannot be tried in shackles whether there is to be a bench trial or a trial by jury.”); In re R.W.S., 728 N.W.2d 326, 331 (N.D.2007) (“[T]he juvenile court had a duty to exercise its discretion when Richard requested that his handcuffs be removed during his adjudicatory hearing.”); State ex rel. 2014In re Staley, 364 N.E.2d 72, 73-74 (Ill. 1977) (“In the absence of . . . a showing [of necessity] . . . an accused cannot be tried in shackles whether there is to be a bench trial or a trial by jury.”); In re R.W.S., 728 N.W.2d 326, 331 (N.D. 2007) (“[T]he juvenile court had a duty to exercise its discretion when Richard requested that his handcuffs be removed during his adjudicatory hearing.”); State ex rel. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Staleygreen2 sentences2014In re Staley, 67 Ill.2d 33 , 7 Ill.Dec. 85 , 364 N.E.2d 72, 73-74 (1977) (“In the absence of ... a showing [of necessity] ... an accused cannot be tried in shackles whether there is to be a bench trial or a trial by jury.”); In re R.W.S., 728 N.W.2d 326, 331 (N.D.2007) (“[T]he juvenile court had a duty to exercise its discretion when Richard requested that his handcuffs be removed during his adjudicatory hearing.”); State ex rel. 2014In re Staley, 67 Ill.2d 33 , 7 Ill.Dec. 85 , 364 N.E.2d 72, 73-74 (1977) (“In the absence of ... a showing [of necessity] ... an accused cannot be tried in shackles whether there is to be a bench trial or a trial by jury.”); In re R.W.S., 728 N.W.2d 326, 331 (N.D.2007) (“[T]he juvenile court had a duty to exercise its discretion when Richard requested that his handcuffs be removed during his adjudicatory hearing.”); State ex rel. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Raymond Wagstaffgreen2 sentences2015The evidence is insufficient to convict if, in order to convict, the jury is required to cross the bounds of permissible inference and enter the forbidden territory of conjecture and speculation.” Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125, 134 (D.C. 2001) (en banc) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also United States v. Wagstaff, 865 F.2d 626, 629 (4th Cir. 1989) (to determine whether the fear or intimidation requirement for robbery has been met, courts may not “substitute[] a set of assumptions about the person taking money . . . for the individualized analysis of that person’s 2015The evidence is insufficient to convict if, in order to convict, the jury is required to cross the bounds of permissible inference and enter the forbidden territory of conjecture and speculation.” Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125, 134 (D.C.2001) (en banc) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also United States v. Wagstaff, 865 F.2d 626, 629 (4th Cir.1989) (to determine whether the fear or intimidation requirement for robbery has been met, courts may not “substitute[ ] a set of assumptions about the person taking money ... for the individualized analysis of that person’s act | 1 | 1 |
Rivas v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2015The evidence is insufficient to convict if, in order to convict, the jury is required to cross the bounds of permissible inference and enter the forbidden territory of conjecture and speculation.” Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125, 134 (D.C. 2001) (en banc) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also United States v. Wagstaff, 865 F.2d 626, 629 (4th Cir. 1989) (to determine whether the fear or intimidation requirement for robbery has been met, courts may not “substitute[] a set of assumptions about the person taking money . . . for the individualized analysis of that person’s 2015The evidence is insufficient to convict if, in order to convict, the jury is required to cross the bounds of permissible inference and enter the forbidden territory of conjecture and speculation.” Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125, 134 (D.C.2001) (en banc) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also United States v. Wagstaff, 865 F.2d 626, 629 (4th Cir.1989) (to determine whether the fear or intimidation requirement for robbery has been met, courts may not “substitute[ ] a set of assumptions about the person taking money ... for the individualized analysis of that person’s act | 1 | 1 |
Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.red2 sentences2001In Sutton the Supreme Court disagreed with the EEOC Guidelines, asserting that "[t]he agency guidelines’ directive that persons be judged in their uncorrected or unmitigated state runs directly counter to the individualized inquiry mandated by the ADA.” Sutton, supra, 527 U.S. at 483, 119 S.Ct. 2139 . 2 . 2001In Sutton the Supreme Court disagreed with the EEOC Guidelines, asserting that "[t]he agency guidelines’ directive that persons be judged in their uncorrected or unmitigated state runs directly counter to the individualized inquiry mandated by the ADA.” Sutton, supra, 527 U.S. at 483, 119 S.Ct. 2139 . 2 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform
green
2 sentences2016Five years after Stanley, the Court shed more light on the constitutional nature and bounds of the familial liberty interest in Smith v. Org. of Foster Families for Equal & Reform, 431 U.S. 816 (1977). 2016Five years after Stanley, the Court shed more light on the constitutional nature and bounds of the familial liberty interest in Smith v. Org. of Foster Families for Equal & Reform, 431 U.S. 816 (1977). | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Stanley v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2016The Court thus held that “the Due Process Clause mandates” an individualized hearing to assess a parent’s fitness “when the issue at stake is-the dismemberment of his family.” 9 Id. at 658 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 . 2016The Court thus held that “the Due Process Clause mandates” an individualized hearing to assess a parent’s fitness “when the issue at stake is-the dismemberment of his family.” 9 Id. at 658 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.