11 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nelson v. Campbellgreen2 sentences2008See Nelson v. Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004). 2007See Nelson v. Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004). | 8 | 8 |
Sims v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See, e.g., Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 668 (Fla.2000); State v. Carter, 89 Ohio St.3d 593, 608 , 734 N.E.2d 345 (2000); Ritchie v. State, 809 N.E.2d 258, 262 (Ind.2004); Wheeler v. Commonwealth, 121 S.W.3d 173, 186 (Ky.2003).3 Today, we join these jurisdictions in holding that death by lethal injection is not per se cruel and unusual punishment. "`3 Indeed, the only case we know of successfully challenging execution by lethal injection involved an inmate's individualized claim that death by lethal injection would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment 2007See, e.g., Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 668 (Fla.2000); State v. Carter, 89 Ohio St.3d 593, 608 , 734 N.E.2d 345 (2000); Ritchie v. State, 809 N.E.2d 258, 262 (Ind.2004); Wheeler v. Commonwealth, 121 S.W.3d 173, 186 (Ky.2003).3 Today, we join these jurisdictions in holding that death by lethal injection is not per se cruel and unusual punishment. "____ "3 Indeed, the only case we know of successfully challenging execution by lethal injection involved an inmate's individualized claim that death by lethal in jection would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual puni | 4 | 4 |
Wheeler v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2008See, e.g., Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 668 (Fla.2000); State v. Carter, 89 Ohio St.3d 593, 608 , 734 N.E.2d 345 (2000); Ritchie v. State, 809 N.E.2d 258, 262 (Ind.2004); Wheeler v. Commonwealth, 121 S.W.3d 173, 186 (Ky.2003).3 Today, we join these jurisdictions in holding that death by lethal injection is not per se cruel and unusual punishment. "`3 Indeed, the only case we know of successfully challenging execution by lethal injection involved an inmate's individualized claim that death by lethal injection would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment 2007See, e.g., Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 668 (Fla.2000); State v. Carter, 89 Ohio St.3d 593, 608 , 734 N.E.2d 345 (2000); Ritchie v. State, 809 N.E.2d 258, 262 (Ind.2004); Wheeler v. Commonwealth, 121 S.W.3d 173, 186 (Ky.2003).3 Today, we join these jurisdictions in holding that death by lethal injection is not per se cruel and unusual punishment. "____ "3 Indeed, the only case we know of successfully challenging execution by lethal injection involved an inmate's individualized claim that death by lethal in jection would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual puni | 4 | 4 |
Ritchie v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See, e.g., Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 668 (Fla.2000); State v. Carter, 89 Ohio St.3d 593, 608 , 734 N.E.2d 345 (2000); Ritchie v. State, 809 N.E.2d 258, 262 (Ind.2004); Wheeler v. Commonwealth, 121 S.W.3d 173, 186 (Ky.2003).3 Today, we join these jurisdictions in holding that death by lethal injection is not per se cruel and unusual punishment. "`3 Indeed, the only case we know of successfully challenging execution by lethal injection involved an inmate's individualized claim that death by lethal injection would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment 2007See, e.g., Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 668 (Fla.2000); State v. Carter, 89 Ohio St.3d 593, 608 , 734 N.E.2d 345 (2000); Ritchie v. State, 809 N.E.2d 258, 262 (Ind.2004); Wheeler v. Commonwealth, 121 S.W.3d 173, 186 (Ky.2003).3 Today, we join these jurisdictions in holding that death by lethal injection is not per se cruel and unusual punishment. "____ "3 Indeed, the only case we know of successfully challenging execution by lethal injection involved an inmate's individualized claim that death by lethal in jection would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual puni | 4 | 4 |
Mills v. Foremost Insurancegreen1 sentence2011Such an individualized inquiry would necessarily prevent this type of claim from being certified as a class.’); see also Mills, 511 F.3d at 1306 (finding that plaintiffs ‘would not be entitled to receive payment for any type of cost charged by a general contractor without showing that they would be reasonably likely to need a general contractor for the repairs in issue.’); Mee[ v. Safeco Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Jerry Devane Bryant v. State of Alabama.green1 sentence2007See Nelson v. Campbell , 541 U.S. 637 , 124 S.Ct. 2117 , 158 L.Ed.2d 924 (2004)." Bryant , 951 So.2d at 748 n. 3. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences2008See, e.g., Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 668 (Fla.2000); State v. Carter, 89 Ohio St.3d 593, 608 , 734 N.E.2d 345 (2000); Ritchie v. State, 809 N.E.2d 258, 262 (Ind.2004); Wheeler v. Commonwealth, 121 S.W.3d 173, 186 (Ky.2003).3 Today, we join these jurisdictions in holding that death by lethal injection is not per se cruel and unusual punishment. "`3 Indeed, the only case we know of successfully challenging execution by lethal injection involved an inmate's individualized claim that death by lethal injection would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment 2008See, e.g., Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 668 (Fla.2000); State v. Carter, 89 Ohio St.3d 593, 608 , 734 N.E.2d 345 (2000); Ritchie v. State, 809 N.E.2d 258, 262 (Ind.2004); Wheeler v. Commonwealth, 121 S.W.3d 173, 186 (Ky.2003).3 Today, we join these jurisdictions in holding that death by lethal injection is not per se cruel and unusual punishment. "`3 Indeed, the only case we know of successfully challenging execution by lethal injection involved an inmate's individualized claim that death by lethal injection would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment | 4 | 2007–2008 |
Alfa Life Ins. Corp. v. Hughes
green
2 sentences2011The individualized inquiry necessary to determine the subjective facts in each transaction pretermits the superiority of any class-wide resolution of disputes.” 861 So.2d at 1103-04 . 2005PARKER, J., concurs in the result. 1 For a detailed description of the policy and payment-plan options and the circumstances surrounding each policyholder's purchase of the policy and maintenance of the policy, see Alfa Life Insurance Corp. v. Hughes , 861 So.2d 1088 , 1090-94 (Ala. 2003). 2 We noted in Hughes that the evidence indicated that different representations were made to each policyholder, that different documentation was provided to each policyholder, that each policyholder was told different information regarding the payment of premiums, and that to determine whether reliance on th | 2 | 2005–2011 |
Foremost Ins. Co. v. Parham
green
1 sentence2005Co. v. Parham , 693 So.2d 409 , 421 (Ala. 1997)). 3 We stated in Hughes : "Moreover, each of the four named plaintiff policyholders requested the minimum-deposit payment plan at different times. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Reynolds Metals Company v. Hill
green
1 sentence2005PARKER, J., concurs in the result. 1 For a detailed description of the policy and payment-plan options and the circumstances surrounding each policyholder's purchase of the policy and maintenance of the policy, see Alfa Life Insurance Corp. v. Hughes , 861 So.2d 1088 , 1090-94 (Ala. 2003). 2 We noted in Hughes that the evidence indicated that different representations were made to each policyholder, that different documentation was provided to each policyholder, that each policyholder was told different information regarding the payment of premiums, and that to determine whether reliance on th | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Funliner of Alabama, LLC v. Pickard
green
1 sentence2003Pickard, 873 So.2d at 211 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.