Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hackett v. Streetergreen2 sentences2004As the Court of Appeals succinctly stated in Hackett v. Streeter, 109 Idaho 261, 264 , 706 P.2d 1372, 1375 (Ct.App.1985): If we require the trial court to consider the enumerated factors in rule 54(e)(3), then it logically follows as a corollary that the court must have sufficient information at its disposal concerning those factors. 2004As the Court of Appeals succinctly stated in Hackett v. Streeter, 109 Idaho 261, 264 , 706 P.2d 1372, 1375 (Ct.App.1985): If we require the trial court to consider the enumerated factors in rule 54(e)(3), then it logically follows as a corollary that the court must have sufficient information at its disposal concerning those factors. | 2 | 2 |
Boel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.green2 sentences2020Cf. Boel, 137 Idaho at 16 , 43 P.3d at 775 (holding the district court did not abuse its discretion when it considered nine of the enumerated factors and indicated it had considered the other three but found their impact to be negligible.). 2020Cf. Boel, 137 Idaho at 16 , 43 P.3d at 775 (holding the district court did not abuse its discretion when it considered nine of the enumerated factors and indicated it had considered the other three but found their impact to be negligible.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
New Hampshire v. Maine
green
2 sentences2008In New Hampshire , the court stated that the enumerated factors were not “inflexible prerequisites or an exhaustive formula for determining the applicability of judicial estoppel.” 532 U.S. at 751 , 121 S.Ct. at 1815 , 149 L.Ed.2d at 978 . 2008In New Hampshire , the court stated that the enumerated factors were not “inflexible prerequisites or an exhaustive formula for determining the applicability of judicial estoppel.” 532 U.S. at 751 , 121 S.Ct. at 1815 , 149 L.Ed.2d at 978 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Foster v. California
green
2 sentences1983In fact, with regard to one identifying trait, Hoisington's photo showed him with a short haircut, quite different from the description given by Boyd and Fuller, while the other five photos showed individuals with hair styles more closely approaching Boyd's and Fuller's descriptions. [6] This case is distinguishable from Foster v. California, 394 U.S. 440 , 89 S.Ct. 1127 , 22 L.Ed.2d 402 (1969). 1983In fact, with regard to one identifying trait, Hoisington's photo showed him with a short haircut, quite different from the description given by Boyd and Fuller, while the other five photos showed individuals with hair styles more closely approaching Boyd's and Fuller's descriptions. [6] This case is distinguishable from Foster v. California, 394 U.S. 440 , 89 S.Ct. 1127 , 22 L.Ed.2d 402 (1969). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.