Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cassels v. Peoplegreen1 sentence2025Cassels v. People, 92 P.3d 951, 956 (Colo. 2004); see also § 18-3– 103(3)(b), C.R.S. 2025 (second degree murder statute). 6 During defense counsel’s argument in support of their motion for a mistrial to the trial court, they initially argued that the suppressed evidence could support self-defense in addition to a heat of passion defense. | 1 | 1 |
Domingo-Gomez v. Peoplegreen1 sentence2024The prosecutor could appropriately argue from this evidence that the reports of 11 Johnson’s past violence were “unverified.” See Domingo-Gomez v. People, 125 P.3d 1043, 1048 (Colo. 2005) (“Final argument may properly include the facts in evidence and any reasonable inferences drawn therefrom.”). ¶ 28 Finally, Corey contends that when the prosecutor called Corey “delusional,” she improperly expressed her personal opinion on the veracity of Corey’s testimony, used derogatory and inflammatory language, tried to inflame the passions and prejudices of the jury, and denigrated the theory of defense | 1 | 1 |
People v. Greniergreen1 sentence2009See People v. Grenier, 200 P.3d 1062, 1079 (Colo.App.2008). | 1 | 1 |
People v. DeBacagreen2 sentences2002See, e.g., People v. De Baca, 736 P.2d 25 , 27 n. 1 (Colo.1987). 2002See, e.g., People v. De Baca, 736 P.2d 25 , 27 n. 1 (Colo.1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
SR Condominiums, LLC v. K.C. Construction, Inc.
green
1 sentence2026Construction, Inc., 176 P.3d 866 (Colo. App. 2007), it did not have subject matter jurisdiction in “this particular show cause hearing” because the SLD statute didn’t apply. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.