32 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McCall v. Finleygreen2 sentences2023Our courts recognize "an overriding rule of civil procedure which says: whatever doesn't make any difference, doesn't matter." McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26 , 28 (Ct. App. 1987). 2023Our courts recognize "an overriding rule of civil procedure which says: whatever doesn't make any difference, doesn't matter." McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26 , 28 (Ct. App. 1987). | 17 | 26 |
Cox v. Coxgreen2 sentences2021See McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26 , 28 (Ct. App. 1987) ("Appellate courts recognize—or at least they should recognize—an overriding rule of civil procedure which says: whatever doesn't make any difference, doesn't matter."); Cox, 290 S.C. at 248 , 349 S.E.2d at 94 (holding the appellant has the burden of showing an error was prejudicial). 3. 2021See McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26 , 28 (Ct. App. 1987) ("Appellate courts recognize—or at least they should recognize—an overriding rule of civil procedure which says: whatever doesn't make any difference, doesn't matter."); Cox, 290 S.C. at 248 , 349 S.E.2d at 94 (holding the appellant has the burden of showing an error was prejudicial). 3. | 2 | 3 |
State v. Jollygreen2 sentences2016See State v. Jolly, 304 S.C. 34, 39 , 402 S.E.2d 895, 898 (Ct. App. 1991) (noting our appellate courts recognize an overriding rule which says: "whatever doesn't make any difference, doesn't matter" (quoting McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26 , 28 (Ct. App. 1987))). 2016See State v. Jolly, 304 S.C. 34, 39 , 402 S.E.2d 895, 898 (Ct. App. 1991) (noting our appellate courts recognize an overriding rule which says: "whatever doesn't make any difference, doesn't matter" (quoting McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26 , 28 (Ct. App. 1987))). | 2 | 2 |
Miles v. Milesgreen2 sentences2010See Miles v. Miles , 303 S.C. 33, 36 , 397 S.E.2d 790, 792 (Ct. App. 1990) (recognizing an overriding rule that "whatever doesn't make a difference, doesn't matter"). 5 . 2010See Miles v. Miles , 303 S.C. 33, 36 , 397 S.E.2d 790, 792 (Ct. App. 1990) (recognizing an overriding rule that "whatever doesn't make a difference, doesn't matter"). 5 . | 2 | 2 |
Snyder's Auto World, Inc. v. George Coleman Motor Co.green2 sentences2018See Snyder's Auto World, Inc. v. George Coleman Motor Co., 315 S.C. 183, 186 , 434 S.E.2d 310, 312 (Ct. App. 1993) ("The burden is on the appellant to show not only error, but also prejudice."); McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26 , 28 (Ct. App. 1987) ("Appellate courts recognize—or at least they should recognize—an overriding rule of civil procedure which says: whatever doesn't make any difference, doesn't matter."). 3. 2018See Snyder's Auto World, Inc. v. George Coleman Motor Co., 315 S.C. 183, 186 , 434 S.E.2d 310, 312 (Ct. App. 1993) ("The burden is on the appellant to show not only error, but also prejudice."); McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26 , 28 (Ct. App. 1987) ("Appellate courts recognize—or at least they should recognize—an overriding rule of civil procedure which says: whatever doesn't make any difference, doesn't matter."). 3. | 1 | 1 |
Hubbard v. Rowegreen2 sentences2014As to the remaining arguments: Hubbard v. Rowe, 192 S.C. 12, 12 , 5 S.E.2d 187, 189 (1939) ("[A]ll that this [c]ourt has ever required is that the questions presented for its decision must first have been fairly and properly raised in the lower [c]ourt and passed upon by that [c]ourt."). 2014As to the remaining arguments: Hubbard v. Rowe, 192 S.C. 12, 12 , 5 S.E.2d 187, 189 (1939) ("[A]ll that this [c]ourt has ever required is that the questions presented for its decision must first have been fairly and properly raised in the lower [c]ourt and passed upon by that [c]ourt."). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Pearsongreen2 sentences2008See Brown v. Pearson, 326 S.C. 409, 417 , 483 S.E.2d 477, 481 (Ct.App.1997) (stating “[a]n error not shown to be prejudicial does not constitute grounds for reversal”); McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26, 28 (Ct.App.1987) (“Appellate courts recognize ... an overriding rule of civil procedure which says: whatever doesn’t make any difference, doesn’t matter.”). 2008See Brown v. Pearson, 326 S.C. 409, 417 , 483 S.E.2d 477, 481 (Ct.App.1997) (stating “[a]n error not shown to be prejudicial does not constitute grounds for reversal”); McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1, 4 , 362 S.E.2d 26, 28 (Ct.App.1987) (“Appellate courts recognize ... an overriding rule of civil procedure which says: whatever doesn’t make any difference, doesn’t matter.”). | 1 | 1 |
McKissick v. J.F. Cleckley & Co.green2 sentences2003Cleckley & Co. , 325 S.C. 327, 350 , 479 S.E.2d 67, 78 (Ct. App. 1996) (An appellant seeking reversal must show error and prejudice); McCall v. Finley , 294 S.C. 1 , 362 S.E.2d 26 (Ct. App. 1987) (stating appellate courts should recognize an overriding rule of civil procedure which says whatever doesnt make any difference, doesnt matter). 2003Cleckley & Co. , 325 S.C. 327, 350 , 479 S.E.2d 67, 78 (Ct. App. 1996) (An appellant seeking reversal must show error and prejudice); McCall v. Finley , 294 S.C. 1 , 362 S.E.2d 26 (Ct. App. 1987) (stating appellate courts should recognize an overriding rule of civil procedure which says whatever doesnt make any difference, doesnt matter). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coxgreen2 sentences2001Cox, 290 S.C. at 492, 351 S.E.2d at 571-72 (emphasis in original) (citation omitted). 2001Cox, 290 S.C. at 492, 351 S.E.2d at 571-72 (emphasis in original) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coxgreen2 sentences2001Cox, 290 S.C. at 492, 351 S.E.2d at 571-72 (emphasis in original) (citation omitted). 2001Cox, 290 S.C. at 492, 351 S.E.2d at 571-72 (emphasis in original) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Morissette v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1996In either case, this presumption would conflict with the overriding presumption of innocence with which the law endows the accused and which extends to every element of the crime. *524 Id. at 522 , 99 S.Ct. at 2458 , 61 L.Ed.2d at 49 -50 (quoting Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 274-75 , 72 S.Ct. 240, 255-56 , 96 L.Ed. 288, 306-07 (1952)) (emphasis in Sandstrom). 1996In either case, this presumption would conflict with the overriding presumption of innocence with which the law endows the accused and which extends to every element of the crime. *524 Id. at 522 , 99 S.Ct. at 2458 , 61 L.Ed.2d at 49 -50 (quoting Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 274-75 , 72 S.Ct. 240, 255-56 , 96 L.Ed. 288, 306-07 (1952)) (emphasis in Sandstrom). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
California v. Carney
green
2 sentences1986As the Court stated, “the pervasive schemes of regulation, which necessarily lead to reduced expectations of privacy, and the exigencies attendant to ready mobility justify searches [of vehicles] without prior recourse to the authority of a magistrate so long as the overriding standard of probable cause is met. ” [Emphasis supplied.] 471 U. S. at 392 , 105 S. Ct. at 2070 , 85 L. 1986As the Court stated, “the pervasive schemes of regulation, which necessarily lead to reduced expectations of privacy, and the exigencies attendant to ready mobility justify searches [of vehicles] without prior recourse to the authority of a magistrate so long as the overriding standard of probable cause is met. ” [Emphasis supplied.] 471 U. S. at 392 , 105 S. Ct. at 2070 , 85 L. | 2 | 1986–1986 |
Sandstrom v. Montana
green
2 sentences1996In either case, this presumption would conflict with the overriding presumption of innocence with which the law endows the accused and which extends to every element of the crime. *524 Id. at 522 , 99 S.Ct. at 2458 , 61 L.Ed.2d at 49 -50 (quoting Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 274-75 , 72 S.Ct. 240, 255-56 , 96 L.Ed. 288, 306-07 (1952)) (emphasis in Sandstrom). 1996In either case, this presumption would conflict with the overriding presumption of innocence with which the law endows the accused and which extends to every element of the crime. *524 Id. at 522 , 99 S.Ct. at 2458 , 61 L.Ed.2d at 49 -50 (quoting Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 274-75 , 72 S.Ct. 240, 255-56 , 96 L.Ed. 288, 306-07 (1952)) (emphasis in Sandstrom). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Cartee v. Cartee
green
2 sentences1992Cartee v. Cartee, 295 S.C. 103 , 366 S.E. (2d) 269 (Ct. App. 1988) (burden upon appellant to show error and resulting prejudice); McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1 , 362 S.E. (2d) 26 (Ct. App. 1987) (appellate courts should recognize an overriding rule of civil procedure which says “whatever doesn’t make any difference, doesn’t matter”). 1992Cartee v. Cartee, 295 S.C. 103 , 366 S.E. (2d) 269 (Ct. App. 1988) (burden upon appellant to show error and resulting prejudice); McCall v. Finley, 294 S.C. 1 , 362 S.E. (2d) 26 (Ct. App. 1987) (appellate courts should recognize an overriding rule of civil procedure which says “whatever doesn’t make any difference, doesn’t matter”). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.