11 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Weatherly v. Weatherlygreen2 sentences1985Weatherly v. Weatherly, 330 N.W.2d 890, 891 (Minn.1983). 1984Weatherly v. Weatherly, 330 N.W.2d 890 (Minn.1983). | 1 | 2 |
Tammen v. Tammengreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Tammen v. Tammen, 289 Minn. 28, 30 , 182 N.W.2d 840, 842 (1970). 2005See, e.g., Tammen v. Tammen, 289 Minn. 28, 30 , 182 N.W.2d 840, 842 (1970). | 1 | 1 |
Marriage of Oberle v. Oberlegreen1 sentence1986Oberle v. Oberle, 355 N.W.2d 210, 212 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Marriage of Pikula v. Pikula
red
2 sentences1986Minn.Stat. § 518.17, subd. 3 (1984); Pikula, 374 N.W.2d at 711 . 1985Minn.Stat. § 518.17, subd. 3 (1984); Pikula, 374 N.W.2d 705 . | 2 | 1985–1986 |
California v. Carney
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 392 , 105 S.Ct. 2066 (concluding that, when "pervasive schemes of regulation, which necessarily lead to reduced expectations of privacy, and the exigencies attendant to ready mobility justify searches without prior recourse to the authority of a magistrate so long as the overriding standard of probable cause is met ") (emphasis added). 2003Id. at 392 , 105 S.Ct. 2066 (concluding that, when "pervasive schemes of regulation, which necessarily lead to reduced expectations of privacy, and the exigencies attendant to ready mobility justify searches without prior recourse to the authority of a magistrate so long as the overriding standard of probable cause is met ") (emphasis added). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
In Re the Marriage of Ellesmere v. Ellesmere
green
1 sentence1986Minn.Stat. § 518.58 (1984), Ellesmere v. Ellesmere, 359 N.W.2d 48, 51 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Hines v. Sheraton Ritz Hotel
green
1 sentence1985Hines, 349 N.W.2d at 330 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Morissette v. United States
green
2 sentences1984In Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 274 , 72 S.Ct. 240, 255 , 96 L.Ed. 288 (1952), the Court held that “a presumption which would permit *256 but not require the jury to assume intent from an isolated fact would prejudge a conclusion which the jury should reach of its own volition * * *. [TJhis presumption conflicts with the overriding presumption of innocence with which the law endows the accused.” 342 U.S. at 275 , 72 S.Ct. at 256 . 1984In Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 274 , 72 S.Ct. 240, 255 , 96 L.Ed. 288 (1952), the Court held that “a presumption which would permit *256 but not require the jury to assume intent from an isolated fact would prejudge a conclusion which the jury should reach of its own volition * * *. [TJhis presumption conflicts with the overriding presumption of innocence with which the law endows the accused.” 342 U.S. at 275 , 72 S.Ct. at 256 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Bogen v. Bogen
green
1 sentence1984Although a trial court has broad discretion in the division of marital property, Bogen v. Bogen, 261 N.W.2d 606 (Minn.1977), the overriding requirement of the statute governing the division of marital property is that the division be equitable. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
green
2 sentences1984Morissette was reaffirmed first in United States v. United States Gypsum, 438 U.S. 422 , 98 S.Ct. 2864 , 57 L.Ed.2d 854 (1978), and then in Sandstrom . 1984Morissette was reaffirmed first in United States v. United States Gypsum, 438 U.S. 422 , 98 S.Ct. 2864 , 57 L.Ed.2d 854 (1978), and then in Sandstrom . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.