28 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1953–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Davisgreen2 sentences2020This approach requires analysis of the evidence in terms of, among other things, the time and place of each purported violation; whether the proof submitted as to one count of the indictment would be a necessary ingredient to a A-4570-18T1 9 conviction under another count; whether one act was an integral part of a larger scheme or episode; the intent of the accused; and the consequences of the criminal standards transgressed. [Id. at 33 (quoting State v. Davis, 68 N.J. 69, 81 (1975)).] Moreover, "merger issues implicate a defendant's substantive state constitutional rights that are rooted in p 2014The overriding principle of merger analysis is that "an accused [who] committed only one offense . . . cannot be punished as if for two." State v. Tate, 216 N.J. 300, 302 (2013) (citing State v. Davis, 68 N.J. 69, 77 (1975)). | 2 | 2 |
Mattero v. Silvermangreen2 sentences2022We added the necessary caveat, however, that "this rule is subsumed by the overriding principle that the statutory violation, to be evidential, must be causally related to the happening of the accident, since a permissible inference of causality is indispensable to its relevancy." Ibid. 7 The Third Restatement suggests "the doctrine of negligence per se is largely superfluous in ascertaining the actor's liability" in statutes "that duplicate the common law," leading some courts to allow parties to argue negligence per se; but others to more frequently reject the doctrine, "recognizing its redu 2022In the usual case, violation of a statute is only evidence of negligence, and only if the statutory violation was "causally 8 In finding plaintiff had sufficiently pled a cognizable claim for negligence per se, the judge wrote: The violation of a statute or regulation 'may be considered by a jury together with all of the evidence in determining issues of negligence[,]' and this proposition is 'subsumed by the overriding principle that the . . . statutory violation, to be evidential, must be causally related to the happening of the accident[.]' Mattero v. Silverman, 71 N.J. | 1 | 3 |
State v. Browngreen2 sentences2020The overriding principle of our merger analysis "is that a defendant who has committed one offense 'cannot be punished as if for two.'" Ibid. (quoting Brown, 138 N.J. at 561 (citations omitted)). 2020The overriding principle of our merger analysis "is that a defendant who has committed one offense 'cannot be punished as if for two.'" Ibid. (quoting Brown, 138 N.J. at 561 (citations omitted)). | 1 | 2 |
Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtorsgreen2 sentences1998The owner owes a minimal degree of care to a trespasser, who has no privilege to be on the land. [Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 N.J. 426, 433 , 625 A.2d 1110 (1993) (citations omitted).] Although the injured party’s status as an invitee, licensee, or trespasser defines the extent of a landowner’s tort liability, foreseeability is one constant that plays a significant role in fixing a landowner’s duty: As in other tort contexts, ... the overriding principle governing the determination of a duty is the general tort obligation to avoid foreseeable harm to others. 1998The owner owes a minimal degree of care to a trespasser, who has no privilege to be on the land. [Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 N.J. 426, 433 , 625 A.2d 1110 (1993) (citations omitted).] Although the injured party’s status as an invitee, licensee, or trespasser defines the extent of a landowner’s tort liability, foreseeability is one constant that plays a significant role in fixing a landowner’s duty: As in other tort contexts, ... the overriding principle governing the determination of a duty is the general tort obligation to avoid foreseeable harm to others. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Troy N. Tate (069314)green1 sentence2014The overriding principle of merger analysis is that "an accused [who] committed only one offense . . . cannot be punished as if for two." State v. Tate, 216 N.J. 300, 302 (2013) (citing State v. Davis, 68 N.J. 69, 77 (1975)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pillotgreen2 sentences1992E.g., State v. Pineda, 119 N.J. 621 , 575 A. 2d 855 (1990) (stating that the polestar of the Code is uniformity in sentencing); see State v. Pillot, 115 N.J. 558, 577 , 560 A. 2d 634 (1989); State v. Towey, 114 N.J. 69, 79 , 552 A. 2d 994 (1989); State v. O'Connor, 105 N.J. 399, 405-06 , 522 A. 2d 423 (1987); State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 , 498 A. 2d 1239 (1985). 1992E.g., State v. Pineda, 119 N.J. 621 , 575 A. 2d 855 (1990) (stating that the polestar of the Code is uniformity in sentencing); see State v. Pillot, 115 N.J. 558, 577 , 560 A. 2d 634 (1989); State v. Towey, 114 N.J. 69, 79 , 552 A. 2d 994 (1989); State v. O'Connor, 105 N.J. 399, 405-06 , 522 A. 2d 423 (1987); State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 , 498 A. 2d 1239 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Alstongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Brotman v. Brotmangreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hankin v. Hamilton Twp. Bd. of Educationgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Joseph v. Carter & Weekes Stevedoring Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mattero v. Silverman
neutral
2 sentences2011However, “this rule is subsumed by the overriding principle that the statutory violation, to be evidential, must be causally related to the happening of the accident, since a permissible inference of causality is indispensable to its relevancy.” Mattero v. Silverman, 71 N.J.Super. 1, 9 , 176 A.2d 270 (App.Div.1961), certif. denied, 36 N.J. 305 , 177 A.2d 490 (1962). 2011However, “this rule is subsumed by the overriding principle that the statutory violation, to be evidential, must be causally related to the happening of the accident, since a permissible inference of causality is indispensable to its relevancy.” Mattero v. Silverman, 71 N.J.Super. 1, 9 , 176 A.2d 270 (App.Div.1961), certif. denied, 36 N.J. 305 , 177 A.2d 490 (1962). | 2 | 2011–2022 |
Service Armament Co. v. Hyland
green
2 sentences1991Noting that there is no statutory definition of the exception, the court followed "the overriding principle of statutory construction ... that in the absence of an explicit indication of special meaning, words will be given their ordinary and well-understood meaning." Id. at 463 , 423 A. 2d 695 (citing Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 556 , 362 A. 2d 13 (1976)). 1991Noting that there is no statutory definition of the exception, the court followed "the overriding principle of statutory construction ... that in the absence of an explicit indication of special meaning, words will be given their ordinary and well-understood meaning." Id. at 463 , 423 A. 2d 695 (citing Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 556 , 362 A. 2d 13 (1976)). | 2 | 1991–1991 |
In Re Vrazo Subpoena
green
2 sentences1991Noting that there is no statutory definition of the exception, the court followed "the overriding principle of statutory construction ... that in the absence of an explicit indication of special meaning, words will be given their ordinary and well-understood meaning." Id. at 463 , 423 A. 2d 695 (citing Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 556 , 362 A. 2d 13 (1976)). 1991Noting that there is no statutory definition of the exception, the court followed "the overriding principle of statutory construction ... that in the absence of an explicit indication of special meaning, words will be given their ordinary and well-understood meaning." Id. at 463 , 423 A. 2d 695 (citing Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 556 , 362 A. 2d 13 (1976)). | 2 | 1991–1991 |
New Jersey Div. of Youth & Family Serv. v. Jy
green
1 sentence2025N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.29(a) permits emergency removal of a child if "the child's continuance in the place or residence or in the care and custody of the parent or guardian presents an imminent danger to the child's life, safety, or health, and there is insufficient time to apply for a court order pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 9:6 - 8.28]." In reviewing emergent removal under N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.28, a court must be "guided by the overriding principle that 'the safety of the child shall be of paramount concern,'" J.Y., 352 N.J. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. WA
green
2 sentences2007Therefore, when addressing a defendant's exclusion from the individual voir dire of a potential juror who is seated and deliberates, the overriding rule remains that "reversal will not be automatic but will depend on the facts." Id. at 65, 875 A. 2d 882 . 2007Therefore, when addressing a defendant’s exclusion from the individual voir dire of a potential juror who is seated and deliberates, the overriding rule remains that “reversal will not be automatic but will depend on the facts.” Id. at 65, 875 A.2d 882 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Kinsella v. Kinsella
green
2 sentences2005First, Kinsella itself introduces its discussion on alimony with the overriding principle that, “[ajccording to the statute, except where the judgment is granted solely on the ground of separation, proofs made in establishing the grounds for divorce may be considered ‘in determining an amount of alimony or maintenance that is fit, reasonable and just.’ ” Id. at 314 , 696 A2d 556 . 2005First, Kinsella itself introduces its discussion on alimony with the overriding principle that, “[ajccording to the statute, except where the judgment is granted solely on the ground of separation, proofs made in establishing the grounds for divorce may be considered ‘in determining an amount of alimony or maintenance that is fit, reasonable and just.’ ” Id. at 314 , 696 A2d 556 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Cooper
green
2 sentences2005State v. Hill, 182 N.J. 532, 542 , 868 A. 2d 290 (2005) (citing State v. Brown, 138 N.J. 481, 561 , 651 A. 2d 19 (1994), overruled on other grounds, State v. Cooper, 151 N.J. 326 , 700 A. 2d 306 (1997)). 2005State v. Hill, 182 N.J. 532, 542 , 868 A. 2d 290 (2005) (citing State v. Brown, 138 N.J. 481, 561 , 651 A. 2d 19 (1994), overruled on other grounds, State v. Cooper, 151 N.J. 326 , 700 A. 2d 306 (1997)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Hill
green
2 sentences2005State v. Hill, 182 N.J. 532, 542 , 868 A. 2d 290 (2005) (citing State v. Brown, 138 N.J. 481, 561 , 651 A. 2d 19 (1994), overruled on other grounds, State v. Cooper, 151 N.J. 326 , 700 A. 2d 306 (1997)). 2005State v. Hill, 182 N.J. 532, 542 , 868 A. 2d 290 (2005) (citing State v. Brown, 138 N.J. 481, 561 , 651 A. 2d 19 (1994), overruled on other grounds, State v. Cooper, 151 N.J. 326 , 700 A. 2d 306 (1997)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Fablok Mills v. Cocker MacH. Co.
green
2 sentences2003We conceive that in certain situations continued use of goods by the buyer may be the most appropriate means of achieving mitigation, i.e. where the buyer is unable to purchase a suitable substitute for the goods. [ Id. at 257 , 310 A. 2d 491 . 2003We conceive that in certain situations continued use of goods by the buyer may be the most appropriate means of achieving mitigation, i.e. where the buyer is unable to purchase a suitable substitute for the goods. [ Id. at 257 , 310 A. 2d 491 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
green
2 sentences1999Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. at 494 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 ; Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. at 516 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 ; Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller, 146 N.J. 527, 539 , 683 A. 2d 818 (1996). 1999Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. at 494 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 ; Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. at 516 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 ; Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller, 146 N.J. 527, 539 , 683 A. 2d 818 (1996). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
green
2 sentences1999Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. at 494 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 ; Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. at 516 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 ; Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller, 146 N.J. 527, 539 , 683 A. 2d 818 (1996). 1999Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. at 494 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 ; Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. at 516 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 ; Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller, 146 N.J. 527, 539 , 683 A. 2d 818 (1996). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.
green
2 sentences1999That principle was explained by this Court in Kramer v. Board of Adjustment of Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 296-97 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965): In these highly controversial and oftentimes debatable zoning cases the courts must recognize that local officials ‘who are thoroughly familiar with then- community’s characteristics and interests and are the proper representatives of its people are undoubtedly the best equipped to pass initially on such applications for variance.’ Therefore, the law presumes that boards of adjustment and municipal governing bodies will act fairly and with proper motives and for v 1999That principle was explained by this Court in Kramer v. Board of Adjustment of Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 296-97 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965): In these highly controversial and oftentimes debatable zoning cases the courts must recognize that local officials ‘who are thoroughly familiar with then- community’s characteristics and interests and are the proper representatives of its people are undoubtedly the best equipped to pass initially on such applications for variance.’ Therefore, the law presumes that boards of adjustment and municipal governing bodies will act fairly and with proper motives and for v | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller
green
2 sentences1999Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. at 494 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 ; Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. at 516 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 ; Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller, 146 N.J. 527, 539 , 683 A. 2d 818 (1996). 1999Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. at 494 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 ; Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. at 516 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 ; Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller, 146 N.J. 527, 539 , 683 A. 2d 818 (1996). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Brett v. Great American Recreation, Inc.
green
2 sentences1998Thus, in a landowner-liability ease decided nearly a half-century ago, we said that “[t]he basis of liability is the foreseeability of harm, and the measure of duty is care in proportion to the foreseeable risk.” Just last term we noted the settled principle that “the common-law classifications of persons on land should be applied flexibly in assessing the landowner’s general tort obligation to avoid foreseeable harm to others.” [Kuzmicz v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc., 147 N.J. 510, 534 , 688 A.2d 1018 (1997) (quoting Brett, supra, 144 N.J. at 508 , 677 A.2d 705 ) (Stein, J., dissenting) (c 1998Thus, in a landowner-liability ease decided nearly a half-century ago, we said that “[t]he basis of liability is the foreseeability of harm, and the measure of duty is care in proportion to the foreseeable risk.” Just last term we noted the settled principle that “the common-law classifications of persons on land should be applied flexibly in assessing the landowner’s general tort obligation to avoid foreseeable harm to others.” [Kuzmicz v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc., 147 N.J. 510, 534 , 688 A.2d 1018 (1997) (quoting Brett, supra, 144 N.J. at 508 , 677 A.2d 705 ) (Stein, J., dissenting) (c | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Kuzmicz v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc.
green
2 sentences1998Thus, in a landowner-liability ease decided nearly a half-century ago, we said that “[t]he basis of liability is the foreseeability of harm, and the measure of duty is care in proportion to the foreseeable risk.” Just last term we noted the settled principle that “the common-law classifications of persons on land should be applied flexibly in assessing the landowner’s general tort obligation to avoid foreseeable harm to others.” [Kuzmicz v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc., 147 N.J. 510, 534 , 688 A.2d 1018 (1997) (quoting Brett, supra, 144 N.J. at 508 , 677 A.2d 705 ) (Stein, J., dissenting) (c 1998Thus, in a landowner-liability ease decided nearly a half-century ago, we said that “[t]he basis of liability is the foreseeability of harm, and the measure of duty is care in proportion to the foreseeable risk.” Just last term we noted the settled principle that “the common-law classifications of persons on land should be applied flexibly in assessing the landowner’s general tort obligation to avoid foreseeable harm to others.” [Kuzmicz v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc., 147 N.J. 510, 534 , 688 A.2d 1018 (1997) (quoting Brett, supra, 144 N.J. at 508 , 677 A.2d 705 ) (Stein, J., dissenting) (c | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and Developers
green
2 sentences1997Carvalho v. Toll Bros. & Developers, 143 N.J. 565, 572 , 675 A.2d 209 (1996). 1997Carvalho v. Toll Bros. & Developers, 143 N.J. 565, 572 , 675 A.2d 209 (1996). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co.
green
2 sentences1997See, e.g., id. at 438, 625 A. 2d 1110 ; Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc., 89 N.J. 270, 277 , 445 A. 2d 1141 (1982); Wytupeck v. City of Camden, 25 N.J. 450, 460-64 , 136 A. 2d 887 (1957); Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co., 9 N.J. 38, 45 , 86 A. 2d 777 (1952). 1997See, e.g., id. at 438, 625 A. 2d 1110 ; Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc., 89 N.J. 270, 277 , 445 A. 2d 1141 (1982); Wytupeck v. City of Camden, 25 N.J. 450, 460-64 , 136 A. 2d 887 (1957); Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co., 9 N.J. 38, 45 , 86 A. 2d 777 (1952). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Wytupeck v. City of Camden
green
2 sentences1997See, e.g., id. at 438, 625 A. 2d 1110 ; Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc., 89 N.J. 270, 277 , 445 A. 2d 1141 (1982); Wytupeck v. City of Camden, 25 N.J. 450, 460-64 , 136 A. 2d 887 (1957); Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co., 9 N.J. 38, 45 , 86 A. 2d 777 (1952). 1997See, e.g., id. at 438, 625 A. 2d 1110 ; Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc., 89 N.J. 270, 277 , 445 A. 2d 1141 (1982); Wytupeck v. City of Camden, 25 N.J. 450, 460-64 , 136 A. 2d 887 (1957); Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co., 9 N.J. 38, 45 , 86 A. 2d 777 (1952). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc.
green
2 sentences1997See, e.g., id. at 438, 625 A. 2d 1110 ; Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc., 89 N.J. 270, 277 , 445 A. 2d 1141 (1982); Wytupeck v. City of Camden, 25 N.J. 450, 460-64 , 136 A. 2d 887 (1957); Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co., 9 N.J. 38, 45 , 86 A. 2d 777 (1952). 1997See, e.g., id. at 438, 625 A. 2d 1110 ; Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc., 89 N.J. 270, 277 , 445 A. 2d 1141 (1982); Wytupeck v. City of Camden, 25 N.J. 450, 460-64 , 136 A. 2d 887 (1957); Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co., 9 N.J. 38, 45 , 86 A. 2d 777 (1952). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. State Supervisory Employees Association
green
2 sentences1996Moreover, in public-sector arbitration agreements, the validity of an arbitrator’s award necessarily must be measured against the overriding principle that “negotiated agreement with respect to matters beyond the lawful authority of the public employer is impermissible.” State v. State Supervisory Employees Ass’n, 78 N.J. 54, 79 , 393 A.2d 233 (1978). 1996Moreover, in public-sector arbitration agreements, the validity of an arbitrator’s award necessarily must be measured against the overriding principle that “negotiated agreement with respect to matters beyond the lawful authority of the public employer is impermissible.” State v. State Supervisory Employees Ass’n, 78 N.J. 54, 79 , 393 A.2d 233 (1978). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Walsh v. State
green
1 sentence1995The overriding principle in each of these cases is that, except where, as in Walsh, supra, the New Jersey statute clearly indicates that New Jersey basis and federal basis are governed by different considerations, federal tax principles are to be applied for purposes of determining gain and loss under the Gross Income Tax Act. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. O'CONNOR
green
2 sentences1992E.g., State v. Pineda, 119 N.J. 621 , 575 A. 2d 855 (1990) (stating that the polestar of the Code is uniformity in sentencing); see State v. Pillot, 115 N.J. 558, 577 , 560 A. 2d 634 (1989); State v. Towey, 114 N.J. 69, 79 , 552 A. 2d 994 (1989); State v. O'Connor, 105 N.J. 399, 405-06 , 522 A. 2d 423 (1987); State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 , 498 A. 2d 1239 (1985). 1992E.g., State v. Pineda, 119 N.J. 621 , 575 A. 2d 855 (1990) (stating that the polestar of the Code is uniformity in sentencing); see State v. Pillot, 115 N.J. 558, 577 , 560 A. 2d 634 (1989); State v. Towey, 114 N.J. 69, 79 , 552 A. 2d 994 (1989); State v. O'Connor, 105 N.J. 399, 405-06 , 522 A. 2d 423 (1987); State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 , 498 A. 2d 1239 (1985). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Towey
green
2 sentences1992E.g., State v. Pineda, 119 N.J. 621 , 575 A. 2d 855 (1990) (stating that the polestar of the Code is uniformity in sentencing); see State v. Pillot, 115 N.J. 558, 577 , 560 A. 2d 634 (1989); State v. Towey, 114 N.J. 69, 79 , 552 A. 2d 994 (1989); State v. O'Connor, 105 N.J. 399, 405-06 , 522 A. 2d 423 (1987); State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 , 498 A. 2d 1239 (1985). 1992E.g., State v. Pineda, 119 N.J. 621 , 575 A. 2d 855 (1990) (stating that the polestar of the Code is uniformity in sentencing); see State v. Pillot, 115 N.J. 558, 577 , 560 A. 2d 634 (1989); State v. Towey, 114 N.J. 69, 79 , 552 A. 2d 994 (1989); State v. O'Connor, 105 N.J. 399, 405-06 , 522 A. 2d 423 (1987); State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 , 498 A. 2d 1239 (1985). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Pineda
green
2 sentences1992E.g., State v. Pineda, 119 N.J. 621 , 575 A. 2d 855 (1990) (stating that the polestar of the Code is uniformity in sentencing); see State v. Pillot, 115 N.J. 558, 577 , 560 A. 2d 634 (1989); State v. Towey, 114 N.J. 69, 79 , 552 A. 2d 994 (1989); State v. O'Connor, 105 N.J. 399, 405-06 , 522 A. 2d 423 (1987); State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 , 498 A. 2d 1239 (1985). 1992E.g., State v. Pineda, 119 N.J. 621 , 575 A. 2d 855 (1990) (stating that the polestar of the Code is uniformity in sentencing); see State v. Pillot, 115 N.J. 558, 577 , 560 A. 2d 634 (1989); State v. Towey, 114 N.J. 69, 79 , 552 A. 2d 994 (1989); State v. O'Connor, 105 N.J. 399, 405-06 , 522 A. 2d 423 (1987); State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 , 498 A. 2d 1239 (1985). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| State v. Yarbough red | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| D'Ercole Sales, Inc. v. Fruehauf Corp. green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Fantony v. Fantony green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Matter of Baby M. red | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Penry v. Lynaugh red | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Zola green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| United States v. Ross green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| California v. Carney green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Foldi v. Jeffries green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Palisades Properties, Inc. v. Brunetti green | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.