Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
27 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1893–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Parish v. Pittsred2 sentences2006Today's decision effectively changes what the law has been for thirteen years under Davlin v. State, supra , and does so without any reference to the doctrine of stare decisis. and the threshold inquiry that must precede a decision to overturn precedent: "[P]recedent governs until it gives a result patently wrong, so manifestly unjust, that a break becomes unavoidable." Zinger v. Terrell, 336 Ark. 423, 430 , 985 S.W.2d 737, 741 (1999); see McGhee v. State, 334 Ark. 543 , 975 S.W.2d 834 (1989) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W.2d 45 (1968)). 2006Today's decision effectively changes what the law has been for thirteen years under Davlin v. State, supra , and does so without any reference to the doctrine of stare decisis. and the threshold inquiry that must precede a decision to overturn precedent: "[P]recedent governs until it gives a result patently wrong, so manifestly unjust, that a break becomes unavoidable." Zinger v. Terrell, 336 Ark. 423, 430 , 985 S.W.2d 737, 741 (1999); see McGhee v. State, 334 Ark. 543 , 975 S.W.2d 834 (1989) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W.2d 45 (1968)). | 1 | 5 |
Chamberlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurancegreen2 sentences2018In Chamberlin v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company, 343 Ark. 392 , 36 S.W.3d 281 (2001), this court described the dictates of stare decisis as follows: Under the doctrine of stare decisis, we are bound to follow prior case law. 2018In Chamberlin v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company, 343 Ark. 392 , 36 S.W.3d 281 (2001), this court described the dictates of stare decisis as follows: Under the doctrine of stare decisis, we are bound to follow prior case law. | 1 | 2 |
Davis v. Parhamgreen2 sentences2013See Davis v. Parham, 362 Ark. 352 , 208 S.W.3d 162 (2005). 11 Cite as 2013 Ark. 499 [t]he purpose of the Tennessee HELP Program is to provide efficient response to highway incidents that impede traffic flow along the urban freeways in the State’s larger urban areas. 2013See Davis v. Parham, 362 Ark. 352 , 208 S.W.3d 162 (2005). 11 Cite as 2013 Ark. 499 [t]he purpose of the Tennessee HELP Program is to provide efficient response to highway incidents that impede traffic flow along the urban freeways in the State’s larger urban areas. | 1 | 1 |
Nowicki v. Piguegreen1 sentence2013See Davis v. Parham, 362 Ark. 352 , 208 S.W.3d 162 (2005). 11 Cite as 2013 Ark. 499 [t]he purpose of the Tennessee HELP Program is to provide efficient response to highway incidents that impede traffic flow along the urban freeways in the State’s larger urban areas. | 1 | 1 |
Cluck v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See Cluck v. State, 365 Ark. 166, 179 , 226 S.W.3d 780, 790 (2006) NOTES [1] The circuit court had earlier denied the same motion regarding Rule 403 and Rule 404(b) prior to a mistrial of the first trial that occurred during voir dire. 2009See Cluck v. State, 365 Ark. 166, 179 , 226 S.W.3d 780, 790 (2006) NOTES [1] The circuit court had earlier denied the same motion regarding Rule 403 and Rule 404(b) prior to a mistrial of the first trial that occurred during voir dire. | 1 | 1 |
Tharp v. Stategreen2 sentences2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han 2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han | 1 | 1 |
McGhee v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Today's decision effectively changes what the law has been for thirteen years under Davlin v. State, supra , and does so without any reference to the doctrine of stare decisis. and the threshold inquiry that must precede a decision to overturn precedent: "[P]recedent governs until it gives a result patently wrong, so manifestly unjust, that a break becomes unavoidable." Zinger v. Terrell, 336 Ark. 423, 430 , 985 S.W.2d 737, 741 (1999); see McGhee v. State, 334 Ark. 543 , 975 S.W.2d 834 (1989) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W.2d 45 (1968)). 2006Today's decision effectively changes what the law has been for thirteen years under Davlin v. State, supra , and does so without any reference to the doctrine of stare decisis. and the threshold inquiry that must precede a decision to overturn precedent: "[P]recedent governs until it gives a result patently wrong, so manifestly unjust, that a break becomes unavoidable." Zinger v. Terrell, 336 Ark. 423, 430 , 985 S.W.2d 737, 741 (1999); see McGhee v. State, 334 Ark. 543 , 975 S.W.2d 834 (1989) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W.2d 45 (1968)). | 1 | 1 |
Akins v. Stategreen2 sentences2006“We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State’s evidence stricdy confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime.” Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). 2006“We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State’s evidence stricdy confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime.” Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). | 1 | 1 |
Zinger v. Terrellgreen2 sentences2006Today's decision effectively changes what the law has been for thirteen years under Davlin v. State, supra , and does so without any reference to the doctrine of stare decisis. and the threshold inquiry that must precede a decision to overturn precedent: "[P]recedent governs until it gives a result patently wrong, so manifestly unjust, that a break becomes unavoidable." Zinger v. Terrell, 336 Ark. 423, 430 , 985 S.W.2d 737, 741 (1999); see McGhee v. State, 334 Ark. 543 , 975 S.W.2d 834 (1989) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W.2d 45 (1968)). 2006Today's decision effectively changes what the law has been for thirteen years under Davlin v. State, supra , and does so without any reference to the doctrine of stare decisis. and the threshold inquiry that must precede a decision to overturn precedent: "[P]recedent governs until it gives a result patently wrong, so manifestly unjust, that a break becomes unavoidable." Zinger v. Terrell, 336 Ark. 423, 430 , 985 S.W.2d 737, 741 (1999); see McGhee v. State, 334 Ark. 543 , 975 S.W.2d 834 (1989) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W.2d 45 (1968)). | 1 | 1 |
| Scamardo v. Jaggersgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Parish v. Pittsred2 sentences2006Today's decision effectively changes what the law has been for thirteen years under Davlin v. State, supra , and does so without any reference to the doctrine of stare decisis. and the threshold inquiry that must precede a decision to overturn precedent: "[P]recedent governs until it gives a result patently wrong, so manifestly unjust, that a break becomes unavoidable." Zinger v. Terrell, 336 Ark. 423, 430 , 985 S.W.2d 737, 741 (1999); see McGhee v. State, 334 Ark. 543 , 975 S.W.2d 834 (1989) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W.2d 45 (1968)). 2006Today's decision effectively changes what the law has been for thirteen years under Davlin v. State, supra , and does so without any reference to the doctrine of stare decisis. and the threshold inquiry that must precede a decision to overturn precedent: "[P]recedent governs until it gives a result patently wrong, so manifestly unjust, that a break becomes unavoidable." Zinger v. Terrell, 336 Ark. 423, 430 , 985 S.W.2d 737, 741 (1999); see McGhee v. State, 334 Ark. 543 , 975 S.W.2d 834 (1989) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W.2d 45 (1968)). | 4 | 5 |
State v. Mitchellred2 sentences2001State Office of Child Support Enforcem’t v. Mitchell, 330 Ark. 338, 343 , 954 S.W.2d 907 (1997) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239, 1252 , 429 S.W.2d 45, 52 (1968) (superseded by statute on other grounds)). 2001State Office of Child Support Enforcem’t v. Mitchell, 330 Ark. 338, 343 , 954 S.W.2d 907 (1997) (citing Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239, 1252 , 429 S.W.2d 45, 52 (1968) (superseded by statute on other grounds)). | 3 | 4 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ward v. State.3
green
2 sentences2018"As a general rule, we are bound to follow prior case law under the doctrine of stare decisis, a policy designed to lend predictability and stability to the law." Ward VII , 2015 Ark 62 , at 5, 455 S.W.3d at 833. 2018Ward v. State , 2015 Ark 62 , at 5, 455 S.W.3d at 833 ." Ward v. State , 2018 Ark. 59 , 5, 539 S.W.3d 546 , 549. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Rice v. Ragsdale
green
1 sentence2021Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Nelson Bros.
green
2 sentences2018Comm’n v. Nelson Bros., 191 Ark. 629 , 87 S.W.2d 394 (1935), Thus, subsequent to the adoption of our current constitution, the doctrine of sovereign immunity has been interpreted at least three different ways. 117Fifth, the majority states that “under the doctrine of stare decisis, we cannot ignore six decades of this court’s precedent prior to Staton.” However, the same can be said with regard to our over twenty-years of precedent set forth in Staton and Tedder. 2018Comm’n v. Nelson Bros., 191 Ark. 629 , 87 S.W.2d 394 (1935), Thus, subsequent to the adoption of our current constitution, the doctrine of sovereign immunity has been interpreted at least three different ways. 117Fifth, the majority states that “under the doctrine of stare decisis, we cannot ignore six decades of this court’s precedent prior to Staton.” However, the same can be said with regard to our over twenty-years of precedent set forth in Staton and Tedder. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Ward v. State
green
1 sentence2018Ward v. State , 2015 Ark 62 , at 5, 455 S.W.3d at 833 ." Ward v. State , 2018 Ark. 59 , 5, 539 S.W.3d 546 , 549. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission
green
2 sentences2016But for this court’s decision in Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n, 335 Ark. 245 , 979 S.W.2d 897 (1998), I would -be writing a dissent. |inIt has been recited more than 800 times in Arkansas appellate court decisions that the first rule of statutory construction is to read the statute just as written, giving each word its customary meaning. 2016But for this court’s decision in Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n, 335 Ark. 245 , 979 S.W.2d 897 (1998), I would -be writing a dissent. |inIt has been recited more than 800 times in Arkansas appellate court decisions that the first rule of statutory construction is to read the statute just as written, giving each word its customary meaning. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Ahmad v. Beck
green
1 sentence2016But for this court’s decision in Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n, 335 Ark. 245 , 979 S.W.2d 897 (1998), I would be writing a dissent. 9 Cite as 2016 Ark. 30 It has been recited more than 800 times in Arkansas appellate court decisions that the first rule of statutory construction is to read the statute just as written, giving each word its customary meaning. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Slocum v. State
green
1 sentence2013We do not apply the doctrine of stare decisis because King and appellant were tried separately so that there is the potential that different evidence was introduced at their respective trials, they were tried in different years with the potential of new technologies available at King’s later trial, and they raised slightly different arguments with regard to the testing of fingerprint evidence. 4 Cite as 2013 Ark. 406 another person.3 Specifically, appellant referred to the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) and new DNA analysis methods. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Marlow v. United Sys. of Ark. Inc.
green
1 sentence2013We will not ignore the well-established doctrine of stare decisis. 4 Cite as 2013 Ark. 460 For all the above-stated reasons, we affirm the circuit court’s award. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
McCoy v. State
green
2 sentences2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han 2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Alford v. State
green
2 sentences2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han 2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Davidson v. State
neutral
2 sentences2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han 2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Fells v. State
green
2 sentences2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han 2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Davis v. State
green
2 sentences2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han 2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Swift v. State
green
2 sentences2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han 2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Tarkington v. State
green
2 sentences2006“We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State’s evidence stricdy confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime.” Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). 2006“We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State’s evidence stricdy confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime.” Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Sanders v. County of Sebastian
green
2 sentences2006We also said in Sanders v. County of Sebastian, 324 Ark. 433 , 922 S.W.2d 334 (1996): While we do have the power to, overrule a previous decision, it is necessary, as a matter of public policy, to uphold prior decisions unless a great injury or injustice would result. 2006We also said in Sanders v. County of Sebastian, 324 Ark. 433 , 922 S.W.2d 334 (1996): While we do have the power to, overrule a previous decision, it is necessary, as a matter of public policy, to uphold prior decisions unless a great injury or injustice would result. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Evans v. State
red
2 sentences2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han 2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Walker v. State
green
1 sentence2006NOTES [1] The parties stipulated to the fact that the search was lawful. [1] "We have, however, zealously guarded the rights of accused persons to have the State's evidence strictly confined to the issues surrounding the offense charged to insure that no one is convicted because he has committed offenses other than that for which he is on trial or because he is of bad character and addicted to crime." Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228, 235 , 955 S.W.2d 483, 487 (1997) (citing Tarkington v. State, 250 Ark. 972 , 469 S.W.2d 93 (1971)). [2] See Swift v. State, 363 Ark. 496 , 215 S.W.3d 619 (2005) (Han | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Gavin v. State
green
2 sentences2005Gavin v. State, 354 Ark. 425 , 125 S.W. 3d 189 (2003). 2005Gavin v. State, 354 Ark. 425 , 125 S.W. 3d 189 (2003). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Shannon v. Wilson
green
2 sentences2005Shannon v. Wilson, 329 Ark. 143 , 947 S.W.2d 349 (1997). 2005Shannon v. Wilson, 329 Ark. 143 , 947 S.W.2d 349 (1997). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Rogers v. Tudor Insurance green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Thomas green | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| Bielski v. Schulze green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Brigance v. Velvet Dove Restaurant, Inc. green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Jackson v. Ozment green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Merchants' Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. Gates green | 1 | 1968–1968 |
| McGehee v. Mathis green | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| Straub & Lohman v. Gordon neutral | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| City of Little Rock v. Barton green | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| City of Little Rock v. Board of Improvements neutral | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| Baker v. State neutral | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| State v. Washmood neutral | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| Sims v. Ahrens green | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| City of Cleveland v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. neutral | 1 | 1938–1938 |
| Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. Miller & England neutral | 1 | 1938–1938 |
| Taliaferro v. Barnett green | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.