collateral challenge (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

collateral challenge in Indiana

23 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1887–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Weatherford v. Stategreen
ind · 1993 · cited in 4 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–2002
2 sentences

2002DISCUSSION "Indiana's postconviction rules do not afford convicted persons an opportunity for a super appeal, but instead create a narrower remedy permitting the collateral challenge of convictions under certain enumerated cireumstances." Jones v. State, 693 N.E.2d 605, 607 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (citing Weatherford v. State, 619 N.E.2d 915, 916 (Ind.1993)).

2002DECISION “Indiana’s postconviction rules do not afford convicted persons an opportunity for a super appeal, but instead create a narrower remedy permitting the collateral challenge of convictions under certain enumerated circumstances.” Jones v. State, 693 N.E.2d 605, 607 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (citing Weatherford v. State, 619 N.E.2d 915, 916 (Ind.1993)).

44
Williams v. Stategreen
ind · 2000 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2001–2002
2 sentences

2002Williams v. State, 724 N.E.2d 1070, 1076 (Ind.2000).

2001Williams v. State, 724 N.E.2d 1070, 1076 (Ind.2000).

22
Jones v. Stategreen
indctapp · 1998 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002DISCUSSION "Indiana's postconviction rules do not afford convicted persons an opportunity for a super appeal, but instead create a narrower remedy permitting the collateral challenge of convictions under certain enumerated cireumstances." Jones v. State, 693 N.E.2d 605, 607 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (citing Weatherford v. State, 619 N.E.2d 915, 916 (Ind.1993)).

2002DECISION “Indiana’s postconviction rules do not afford convicted persons an opportunity for a super appeal, but instead create a narrower remedy permitting the collateral challenge of convictions under certain enumerated circumstances.” Jones v. State, 693 N.E.2d 605, 607 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (citing Weatherford v. State, 619 N.E.2d 915, 916 (Ind.1993)).

22
Stephens v. Stategreen
ind · 2004 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020Cf. Stephens v. State, 818 N.E.2d 936, 939 (Ind. 2004) (stating that a defendant cannot collaterally attack a sentence on appeal from a probation revocation).

11
Nemec v. Shradergreen
del · 2010 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See Nemec, 991 A.2d at 1127 (recognizing that challenged conduct may not breach the implied covenant if it advances the legitimate interest of a relying counter-party).

11
Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Conardgreen
ind · 1993 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006Mgmt. v. Conard, 614 N.E.2d 916, 922 (Ind.1993) (defining a collateral challenge as "an attack made in a proceeding that has an independent purpose other than to impeach or overturn the judgment, although impeaching or overturning the judgment may be necessary to the success of the action”). 7 .

11
Bivins v. Stategreen
ind · 2000 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See Bivins v. State, 735 N.E.2d 1116 (Ind.2000).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (28)

CaseCitedYears
Ford v. State green
indctapp · 2001
2 sentences

2003Ford, 755 N.E.2d at 1141 .

2002Id.

22002–2003
Van Meter v. State green
ind · 1995
1 sentence

2018“Criminal defendants may not circumvent these procedures by seeking remedies under the civil law.” Id. (internal citations omitted); see also Ind. Post-Conviction Rule 1(b) (providing that the post- conviction rules provide the exclusive method to raise a collateral challenge to a criminal conviction or sentence).

12018–2018
Cinergy Corp. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. green
indctapp · 2003
1 sentence

2012Cinergy, 785 N.E.2d at 590 .

12012–2012
Jackson v. State green
indctapp · 2005
1 sentence

2006Today we issue an order denying transfer in Jackson v. State, 826 N.E.2d 120 (Ind.Ct.App.2005).

12006–2006
Groseclose Ex Rel. Harries v. Dutton green
tnmd · 1984
2 sentences

2005Lexis 3702 (M.D.Pa.2004) (relying on both the principles of Rees and Dusky to determine competency to forego a collateral challenge); Groseclose v. Dutton, 594 F.Supp. 949 , 957 n. 4 (M.D.Tenn.1984) (stating that Dusky is analytically equivalent to the Rees competency test).

2005Lexis 3702 (M.D.Pa.2004) (relying on both the principles of Rees and Dusky to determine competency to forego a collateral challenge); Groseclose v. Dutton, 594 F.Supp. 949 , 957 n. 4 (M.D.Tenn.1984) (stating that Dusky is analytically equivalent to the Rees competency test).

12005–2005
Timberlake v. State green
ind · 2001
1 sentence

2005Id. (citing Ind. Post-Conviction Rule 1(1)).

12005–2005
Commonwealth v. Lopez green
mass · 1998
2 sentences

2004After discussing the holding in Parke , the court concluded that "a collateral challenge, like the defendant's, to a prior conviction by guilty plea ... must be accompanied by sufficient credible and reliable evidence to rebut a presumption that the prior conviction was valid." Id.

2004After discussing the holding in Parke, the court concluded that "a collateral challenge, like the defendant's, to a prior conviction by guilty plea ... must be accompanied by sufficient credible and reliable evidence to rebut a presumption that the prior conviction was valid." Id.

12004–2004
McBroom v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. green
scotus · 2002
1 sentence

2002A collateral challenge to the conviction and sentence under Indiana’s rules for post-conviction relief was denied by the post-conviction court and affirmed on appeal in Wrinkles v. State, 749 N.E.2d 1179 (Ind.2001), cert. denied — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1610 , 152 L.Ed.2d 624 (2002).

12002–2002
Straughn v. Kimmy green
scotus · 2002
1 sentence

2002A collateral challenge to the conviction and sentence under Indiana’s rules for post-conviction relief was denied by the post-conviction court and affirmed on appeal in Wrinkles v. State, 749 N.E.2d 1179 (Ind.2001), cert. denied — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1610 , 152 L.Ed.2d 624 (2002).

12002–2002
Wrinkles v. State green
ind · 2001
1 sentence

2002A collateral challenge to the conviction and sentence under Indiana’s rules for post-conviction relief was denied by the post-conviction court and affirmed on appeal in Wrinkles v. State, 749 N.E.2d 1179 (Ind.2001), cert. denied — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1610 , 152 L.Ed.2d 624 (2002).

12002–2002
Minnick v. State green
ind · 1998
1 sentence

1999Minnick v. State, 698 N.E.2d 745 (Ind.1998).

11999–1999
Adams v. New York green
· 1904
1 sentence

1945In support of this view appellee cites Hantz v. State (May 8, 1929, Transfer denied Jan. 29, 1931), 92 Ind. App. 108 , 166 N. E. 439 ; McSwain v. State (May 10, 1929), 89 Ind. App. 592 , 166 N. E. 444 , 167 N. E. 568 ; People v. Castree (1924), 311 Ill. 392 , 143 N. E. 112 ; People v. Brocamp (1923), 307 Ill. 448 , 138 N. E. 728; Adams v. New York (1904), 192 U S. 585, 48 L.

11945–1945
McSwain v. State neutral
indctapp · 1929
2 sentences

1945In support of this view appellee cites Hantz v. State (May 8, 1929, Transfer denied Jan. 29, 1931), 92 Ind. App. 108 , 166 N. E. 439 ; McSwain v. State (May 10, 1929), 89 Ind. App. 592 , 166 N. E. 444 , 167 N. E. 568 ; People v. Castree (1924), 311 Ill. 392 , 143 N. E. 112 ; People v. Brocamp (1923), 307 Ill. 448 , 138 N. E. 728; Adams v. New York (1904), 192 U S. 585, 48 L.

1945In support of this view appellee cites Hantz v. State (May 8, 1929, Transfer denied Jan. 29, 1931), 92 Ind. App. 108 , 166 N. E. 439 ; McSwain v. State (May 10, 1929), 89 Ind. App. 592 , 166 N. E. 444 , 167 N. E. 568 ; People v. Castree (1924), 311 Ill. 392 , 143 N. E. 112 ; People v. Brocamp (1923), 307 Ill. 448 , 138 N. E. 728; Adams v. New York (1904), 192 U S. 585, 48 L.

11945–1945
Hantz v. State neutral
indctapp · 1929
2 sentences

1945In support of this view appellee cites Hantz v. State (May 8, 1929, Transfer denied Jan. 29, 1931), 92 Ind. App. 108 , 166 N. E. 439 ; McSwain v. State (May 10, 1929), 89 Ind. App. 592 , 166 N. E. 444 , 167 N. E. 568 ; People v. Castree (1924), 311 Ill. 392 , 143 N. E. 112 ; People v. Brocamp (1923), 307 Ill. 448 , 138 N. E. 728; Adams v. New York (1904), 192 U S. 585, 48 L.

1945In support of this view appellee cites Hantz v. State (May 8, 1929, Transfer denied Jan. 29, 1931), 92 Ind. App. 108 , 166 N. E. 439 ; McSwain v. State (May 10, 1929), 89 Ind. App. 592 , 166 N. E. 444 , 167 N. E. 568 ; People v. Castree (1924), 311 Ill. 392 , 143 N. E. 112 ; People v. Brocamp (1923), 307 Ill. 448 , 138 N. E. 728; Adams v. New York (1904), 192 U S. 585, 48 L.

11945–1945
People v. Brocamp green
ill · 1923
2 sentences

1945In support of this view appellee cites Hantz v. State (May 8, 1929, Transfer denied Jan. 29, 1931), 92 Ind. App. 108 , 166 N. E. 439 ; McSwain v. State (May 10, 1929), 89 Ind. App. 592 , 166 N. E. 444 , 167 N. E. 568 ; People v. Castree (1924), 311 Ill. 392 , 143 N. E. 112 ; People v. Brocamp (1923), 307 Ill. 448 , 138 N. E. 728; Adams v. New York (1904), 192 U S. 585, 48 L.

1945In support of this view appellee cites Hantz v. State (May 8, 1929, Transfer denied Jan. 29, 1931), 92 Ind. App. 108 , 166 N. E. 439 ; McSwain v. State (May 10, 1929), 89 Ind. App. 592 , 166 N. E. 444 , 167 N. E. 568 ; People v. Castree (1924), 311 Ill. 392 , 143 N. E. 112 ; People v. Brocamp (1923), 307 Ill. 448 , 138 N. E. 728; Adams v. New York (1904), 192 U S. 585, 48 L.

11945–1945
People v. Castree green
ill · 1924
2 sentences

1945In support of this view appellee cites Hantz v. State (May 8, 1929, Transfer denied Jan. 29, 1931), 92 Ind. App. 108 , 166 N. E. 439 ; McSwain v. State (May 10, 1929), 89 Ind. App. 592 , 166 N. E. 444 , 167 N. E. 568 ; People v. Castree (1924), 311 Ill. 392 , 143 N. E. 112 ; People v. Brocamp (1923), 307 Ill. 448 , 138 N. E. 728; Adams v. New York (1904), 192 U S. 585, 48 L.

1945In support of this view appellee cites Hantz v. State (May 8, 1929, Transfer denied Jan. 29, 1931), 92 Ind. App. 108 , 166 N. E. 439 ; McSwain v. State (May 10, 1929), 89 Ind. App. 592 , 166 N. E. 444 , 167 N. E. 568 ; People v. Castree (1924), 311 Ill. 392 , 143 N. E. 112 ; People v. Brocamp (1923), 307 Ill. 448 , 138 N. E. 728; Adams v. New York (1904), 192 U S. 585, 48 L.

11945–1945
State v. Shelton neutral
mo · 1926
2 sentences

1927“When a magistrate issues a search warrant, he thereby declares that he is satisfied that probable cause exists.” Frihart v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 622 , 208 N. W. 469 ; Bergman v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 615 , 208 N. W. 470 . *346 State v. Shelton (1926), 314 Mo. 333 , 284 S. W. 433 , holds that it cannot be presumed, in a collateral inquiry on a motion to quash a search warrant issued by a justice of the peace on application of the prosecuting attorney and served by the sheriff, that such officers have failed to perform their duties properly and that a defendant may not thus impeach the searc

1927“When a magistrate issues a search warrant, he thereby declares that he is satisfied that probable cause exists.” Frihart v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 622 , 208 N. W. 469 ; Bergman v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 615 , 208 N. W. 470 . *346 State v. Shelton (1926), 314 Mo. 333 , 284 S. W. 433 , holds that it cannot be presumed, in a collateral inquiry on a motion to quash a search warrant issued by a justice of the peace on application of the prosecuting attorney and served by the sheriff, that such officers have failed to perform their duties properly and that a defendant may not thus impeach the searc

11927–1927
Bergman v. State green
wis · 1926
2 sentences

1927“When a magistrate issues a search warrant, he thereby declares that he is satisfied that probable cause exists.” Frihart v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 622 , 208 N. W. 469 ; Bergman v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 615 , 208 N. W. 470 . *346 State v. Shelton (1926), 314 Mo. 333 , 284 S. W. 433 , holds that it cannot be presumed, in a collateral inquiry on a motion to quash a search warrant issued by a justice of the peace on application of the prosecuting attorney and served by the sheriff, that such officers have failed to perform their duties properly and that a defendant may not thus impeach the searc

1927“When a magistrate issues a search warrant, he thereby declares that he is satisfied that probable cause exists.” Frihart v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 622 , 208 N. W. 469 ; Bergman v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 615 , 208 N. W. 470 . *346 State v. Shelton (1926), 314 Mo. 333 , 284 S. W. 433 , holds that it cannot be presumed, in a collateral inquiry on a motion to quash a search warrant issued by a justice of the peace on application of the prosecuting attorney and served by the sheriff, that such officers have failed to perform their duties properly and that a defendant may not thus impeach the searc

11927–1927
Frihart v. State green
wis · 1926
2 sentences

1927“When a magistrate issues a search warrant, he thereby declares that he is satisfied that probable cause exists.” Frihart v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 622 , 208 N. W. 469 ; Bergman v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 615 , 208 N. W. 470 . *346 State v. Shelton (1926), 314 Mo. 333 , 284 S. W. 433 , holds that it cannot be presumed, in a collateral inquiry on a motion to quash a search warrant issued by a justice of the peace on application of the prosecuting attorney and served by the sheriff, that such officers have failed to perform their duties properly and that a defendant may not thus impeach the searc

1927“When a magistrate issues a search warrant, he thereby declares that he is satisfied that probable cause exists.” Frihart v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 622 , 208 N. W. 469 ; Bergman v. State (1926), 189 Wis. 615 , 208 N. W. 470 . *346 State v. Shelton (1926), 314 Mo. 333 , 284 S. W. 433 , holds that it cannot be presumed, in a collateral inquiry on a motion to quash a search warrant issued by a justice of the peace on application of the prosecuting attorney and served by the sheriff, that such officers have failed to perform their duties properly and that a defendant may not thus impeach the searc

11927–1927
Exchange Bank v. Ault neutral
ind · 1885
1 sentence

1897Bailey v. Rinker, 146 Ind. 129 ; Shoemaker v. South Bend Spark Arrester Co., 135 Ind. 471; Nichols v. State, 127 Ind. 406 ; Exchange Bank v. Ault, 102 Ind. 322 .

11897–1897
Nichols v. State green
ind · 1891
1 sentence

1897Bailey v. Rinker, 146 Ind. 129 ; Shoemaker v. South Bend Spark Arrester Co., 135 Ind. 471; Nichols v. State, 127 Ind. 406 ; Exchange Bank v. Ault, 102 Ind. 322 .

11897–1897
Shoemaker v. South Bend Spark Arrester Co. green
ind · 1893
1 sentence

1897Bailey v. Rinker, 146 Ind. 129 ; Shoemaker v. South Bend Spark Arrester Co., 135 Ind. 471; Nichols v. State, 127 Ind. 406 ; Exchange Bank v. Ault, 102 Ind. 322 .

11897–1897
Bailey v. Rinker green
ind · 1896
1 sentence

1897Bailey v. Rinker, 146 Ind. 129 ; Shoemaker v. South Bend Spark Arrester Co., 135 Ind. 471; Nichols v. State, 127 Ind. 406 ; Exchange Bank v. Ault, 102 Ind. 322 .

11897–1897
Wright v. State neutral
ind · 1855
11887–1887
Wentworth v. Alexander neutral
ind · 1878
11887–1887
Smith v. Hess green
ind · 1884
11887–1887
Holderman v. Thompson neutral
ind · 1886
11887–1887
Willis v. Bayles green
ind · 1886
11887–1887

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 35-50-2-9 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 107 (1909–2026) WA 90 (1927–2026) OH 66 (1973–2026) TX 63 (1899–2026) CA 53 (1908–2024) NY 44 (1866–2026) FL 38 (1983–2019) VT 36 (1971–2026) IL 33 (1924–2026) MD 25 (1982–2022) IN 23 (1887–2020) OR 22 (1888–2025) MI 21 (1927–2024) AR 19 (1992–2026) MA 13 (1991–2026) MO 13 (1900–2024) GA 13 (1968–2024) CT 12 (1997–2025) KS 12 (1969–2024) AL 11 (1899–2001) WI 10 (1928–2026) CO 10 (1984–2022) NJ 9 (1901–2026) NM 9 (1993–2020) IA 7 (1901–2018) SD 6 (2006–2014) TN 6 (2002–2009) DC 6 (1979–2024) NH 6 (1988–2015) UT 5 (2004–2019) NE 5 (1979–2006) MT 4 (2008–2015) ME 4 (2010–2018) NC 4 (1887–2003) ID 4 (1983–2024) MN 4 (1988–2014) KY 4 (1898–2023) VA 3 (2001–2008) AZ 3 (2011–2024) MS 3 (1922–2011) RI 3 (1998–2007) OK 2 (1978–1981) DE 2 (2021–2021) NV 2 (1995–2013) AK 2 (1967–1988)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check