Jones rule in Maryland

17 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (15)

Case	Followed	Cited
Lee v. Stategreen md · 2008 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014See Lee, 405 Md. at 178 , 950 A.2d 125 . 2014See Lee, 405 Md. at 178 , 950 A.2d 125 .	2	2
State v. Hendersongreen nj · 2011 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 2 sentences 2019Under Henderson , as long as the defendant produces some evidence of suggestiveness, then the court explores all relevant indicators of suggestiveness and reliability in order to determine whether there is a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. 27 A.3d at 919 . 18 Additionally, we disagree with amici 's contention that the Maryland General Assembly's 2014 amendment to PS § 3-506 counsels in favor of abandoning the Manson - Jones framework. 2019Based on these recommendations, the court delineated a list of factors that trial courts may consider when assessing suggestiveness and reliability. 16 Id. at 920-21. *85 In addition, the court revised the Manson framework. 17 246 The case at bar is not this Court's first opportunity to review Maryland's Manson - Jones framework in light of the **86 New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in Henderson .	1	1
Smiley v. Stategreen md · 2015 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 2 sentences 2019See Smiley , 442 Md. at 184 , 111 A.3d at 52 . 2019See Smiley , 442 Md. at 184 , 111 A.3d at 52 .	1	1
North Carolina v. Alfordgreen scotus · 1970 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). 2012See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970).	1	1
Givens v. Stategreen md · 1893 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005A. Historic Procedures for Returning the Verdict The protocol for the return of verdicts at trial in Maryland in the late Nineteenth Century was articulated in Givens v. State, 76 Md. 485, 487 , 25 A. 689, 689 (1893): When the jury have come to a unanimous determination with respect to their verdict, they return to the box to deliver it. 2005A. Historic Procedures for Returning the Verdict The protocol for the return of verdicts at trial in Maryland in the late Nineteenth Century was articulated in Givens v. State, 76 Md. 485, 487 , 25 A. 689, 689 (1893): When the jury have come to a unanimous determination with respect to their verdict, they return to the box to deliver it.	1	1
Jones v. Commonwealthgreen vactapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 1 sentence 1999It reasoned, in part, that “in order for Jones’s presence on the premises to give rise to probable cause to arrest for trespassing, [the arresting officer] must have had a reasonable basis to conclude that Jones was neither a resident nor a guest of a resident..” Id. at 191.	1	1
State v. Joaogreen haw · 1975 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976United States v. Allsenberrie, 424 F. 2d 1209, 1212-14 (7th Cir. 1970); Velasquez v. Rhay, 408 F. 2d 9, 10 (9th Cir. 1969); Cook v. State, 134 Ga. App. 712, 714-15 , 215 S.E.2d 728 (1975); State v. Joao, 533 P. 2d 270, 274 (Hawaii 1975); State v. Dias, 52 Hawaii 100, 105 , 470 P. 2d 510 (1970); People v. Vaglica, 99 Ill.	1	1
Donald L. Velasquez v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiarygreen ca9 · 1969 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976United States v. Allsenberrie, 424 F. 2d 1209, 1212-14 (7th Cir. 1970); Velasquez v. Rhay, 408 F. 2d 9, 10 (9th Cir. 1969); Cook v. State, 134 Ga. App. 712, 714-15 , 215 S.E.2d 728 (1975); State v. Joao, 533 P. 2d 270, 274 (Hawaii 1975); State v. Dias, 52 Hawaii 100, 105 , 470 P. 2d 510 (1970); People v. Vaglica, 99 Ill.	1	1
United States v. James Allsenberriegreen ca7 · 1970 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976United States v. Allsenberrie, 424 F. 2d 1209, 1212-14 (7th Cir. 1970); Velasquez v. Rhay, 408 F. 2d 9, 10 (9th Cir. 1969); Cook v. State, 134 Ga. App. 712, 714-15 , 215 S.E.2d 728 (1975); State v. Joao, 533 P. 2d 270, 274 (Hawaii 1975); State v. Dias, 52 Hawaii 100, 105 , 470 P. 2d 510 (1970); People v. Vaglica, 99 Ill.	1	1
United States v. James Luther Cobb, Sr.green ca4 · 1970 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976Nothing announced in Alderman [v. United States, 394 U. S. 165 , 89 S. Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)], in any manner weakens the vitality of the Jones rule upon which we rely . ...”); United States v. Love, 472 F. 2d 490, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Fields, 458 F. 2d 1194, 1196 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 927 (1973); United States v. Gargiso, 456 F. 2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Pastore, 456 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. West, 453 F. 2d 1351, 1354-55 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cobb, 432 F. 2d 716, 721-22 (4th Cir. 1970) (The court addres	1	1
United States v. Charles Winfield Westgreen ca3 · 1972 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976Nothing announced in Alderman [v. United States, 394 U. S. 165 , 89 S. Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)], in any manner weakens the vitality of the Jones rule upon which we rely . ...”); United States v. Love, 472 F. 2d 490, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Fields, 458 F. 2d 1194, 1196 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 927 (1973); United States v. Gargiso, 456 F. 2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Pastore, 456 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. West, 453 F. 2d 1351, 1354-55 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cobb, 432 F. 2d 716, 721-22 (4th Cir. 1970) (The court addres	1	1
United States v. Frank Gargisogreen ca2 · 1972 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976Nothing announced in Alderman [v. United States, 394 U. S. 165 , 89 S. Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)], in any manner weakens the vitality of the Jones rule upon which we rely . ...”); United States v. Love, 472 F. 2d 490, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Fields, 458 F. 2d 1194, 1196 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 927 (1973); United States v. Gargiso, 456 F. 2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Pastore, 456 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. West, 453 F. 2d 1351, 1354-55 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cobb, 432 F. 2d 716, 721-22 (4th Cir. 1970) (The court addres	1	1
United States v. Ronald Monroe Fields, in No. 71-1218 Appeal of Louis Socrates Davisgreen ca3 · 1972 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976Nothing announced in Alderman [v. United States, 394 U. S. 165 , 89 S. Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)], in any manner weakens the vitality of the Jones rule upon which we rely . ...”); United States v. Love, 472 F. 2d 490, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Fields, 458 F. 2d 1194, 1196 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 927 (1973); United States v. Gargiso, 456 F. 2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Pastore, 456 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. West, 453 F. 2d 1351, 1354-55 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cobb, 432 F. 2d 716, 721-22 (4th Cir. 1970) (The court addres	1	1
United States v. Harvey Gene Love, Jr. And Earline Robin Swedagreen ca5 · 1973 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976Nothing announced in Alderman [v. United States, 394 U. S. 165 , 89 S. Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)], in any manner weakens the vitality of the Jones rule upon which we rely . ...”); United States v. Love, 472 F. 2d 490, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Fields, 458 F. 2d 1194, 1196 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 927 (1973); United States v. Gargiso, 456 F. 2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Pastore, 456 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. West, 453 F. 2d 1351, 1354-55 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cobb, 432 F. 2d 716, 721-22 (4th Cir. 1970) (The court addres	1	1
Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. Frankgreen md · 1974 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975 2 sentences 1975The Daily Record (Baltimore), 14 September 1973, at 2, col. 1. [4] Indeed, some of the newspaper articles relating to these matters are attached to Jones' motion for change of venue, made 5 December 1974, and appear in the record of this case. [5] Maryland State Bar Association v. Frank, 272 Md. 528, 530, 531 , 325 A.2d 718, 719, 720 (1974). [6] Other indictments of Irvin were dropped before trial. [7] At the time of Frank's disbarment, Maryland Rules BV1-10 governed disciplinary proceedings. 1975The Daily Record (Baltimore), 14 September 1973, at 2, col. 1. [4] Indeed, some of the newspaper articles relating to these matters are attached to Jones' motion for change of venue, made 5 December 1974, and appear in the record of this case. [5] Maryland State Bar Association v. Frank, 272 Md. 528, 530, 531 , 325 A.2d 718, 719, 720 (1974). [6] Other indictments of Irvin were dropped before trial. [7] At the time of Frank's disbarment, Maryland Rules BV1-10 governed disciplinary proceedings.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

Case	Cited	Years
Jones v. Hyatt Insurance Agency, Inc. green md · 1999 1 sentence 2021Id.	1	2021–2021
Houghton v. Forrest green md · 2010 2 sentences 2019Enough of our sister states still retain the Manson - Jones framework that it cannot seriously be labeled a "remnant of [an] abandoned doctrine," Houghton v. Forrest , 412 Md. 578 , 587, 989 A.2d 223 (2010) (alteration in original). 2019Enough of our sister states still retain the Manson - Jones framework that it cannot seriously be labeled a "remnant of [an] abandoned doctrine," Houghton v. Forrest , 412 Md. 578 , 587, 989 A.2d 223 (2010) (alteration in original).	1	2019–2019
Ross v. State Board of Elections green md · 2005 1 sentence 2014Id. at 248–49.	1	2014–2014
Liddy v. Lamone green md · 2007 1 sentence 2014Id. at 248-49, 919 A.2d 1276 .	1	2014–2014
Ashburn v. Anne Arundel County green md · 1986 2 sentences 2011The State argues that the public duty doctrine applies to Ms. Jones’ claim of negligent retention, training and supervision because “the State’s responsibility, through the Sheriff, to train and supervise Deputies is owed to the public, not to individual citizens.” Ms. Jones disagrees, contending that the public duty doctrine applies to a case against a police officer for failure to protect a citizen from injury caused by another citizen, but her claim is a direct claim against the State for 667 failing to properly train, supervise and retain the deputies. 18 Alternatively, Ms. Jones argues t 2011The State argues that the public duty doctrine applies to Ms. Jones’ claim of negligent retention, training and supervision because “the State’s responsibility, through the Sheriff, to train and supervise Deputies is owed to the public, not to individual citizens.” Ms. Jones disagrees, contending that the public duty doctrine applies to a case against a police officer for failure to protect a citizen from injury caused by another citizen, but her claim is a direct claim against the State for 667 failing to properly train, supervise and retain the deputies. 18 Alternatively, Ms. Jones argues t	1	2011–2011
Jones v. State green missctapp · 2006 1 sentence 2009Id. at 994 .	1	2009–2009
Jones v. Speed green md · 1990 2 sentences 1996Claims for that medical injury are therefore barred by § 5-109(a)(l).” Id., 320 Md. at 255 , 577 A.2d 64 (citations omitted). 1996Claims for that medical injury are therefore barred by § 5-109(a)(l).” Id., 320 Md. at 255 , 577 A.2d 64 (citations omitted).	1	1996–1996
Duncan and Smith v. State green md · 1977 2 sentences 1989The Jones rule of standing was not intended to prevent the State from showing voluntary pre-search abandonment or to apply to a possession prosecution when such abandonment is shown____ Such abandonment by appellants was shown here and, therefore, the search and seizure was reasonable as to them.” 281 Md. at 267 , 378 A.2d at 1120-21 . 1989The Jones rule of standing was not intended to prevent the State from showing voluntary pre-search abandonment or to apply to a possession prosecution when such abandonment is shown____ Such abandonment by appellants was shown here and, therefore, the search and seizure was reasonable as to them.” 281 Md. at 267 , 378 A.2d at 1120-21 .	1	1989–1989
United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl Reese green ca5 · 1973 2 sentences 1977United States v. Colbert, supra, 474 F. 2d at 177 . 1977United States v. Colbert, supra, 474 F. 2d at 177 .	1	1977–1977
Alderman v. United States green scotus · 1969 2 sentences 1976Nothing announced in Alderman [v. United States, 394 U. S. 165 , 89 S. Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)], in any manner weakens the vitality of the Jones rule upon which we rely . ...”); United States v. Love, 472 F. 2d 490, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Fields, 458 F. 2d 1194, 1196 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 927 (1973); United States v. Gargiso, 456 F. 2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Pastore, 456 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. West, 453 F. 2d 1351, 1354-55 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cobb, 432 F. 2d 716, 721-22 (4th Cir. 1970) (The court addres 1976Nothing announced in Alderman [v. United States, 394 U. S. 165 , 89 S. Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)], in any manner weakens the vitality of the Jones rule upon which we rely . ...”); United States v. Love, 472 F. 2d 490, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Fields, 458 F. 2d 1194, 1196 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 927 (1973); United States v. Gargiso, 456 F. 2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Pastore, 456 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. West, 453 F. 2d 1351, 1354-55 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cobb, 432 F. 2d 716, 721-22 (4th Cir. 1970) (The court addres	1	1976–1976
United States v. Joseph Michael Pastore and Frank Paul De Angelis neutral ca2 · 1972 1 sentence 1976Nothing announced in Alderman [v. United States, 394 U. S. 165 , 89 S. Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)], in any manner weakens the vitality of the Jones rule upon which we rely . ...”); United States v. Love, 472 F. 2d 490, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Fields, 458 F. 2d 1194, 1196 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 927 (1973); United States v. Gargiso, 456 F. 2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Pastore, 456 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. West, 453 F. 2d 1351, 1354-55 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cobb, 432 F. 2d 716, 721-22 (4th Cir. 1970) (The court addres	1	1976–1976
People v. Vaglica green illappct · 1968 1 sentence 1976United States v. Allsenberrie, 424 F. 2d 1209, 1212-14 (7th Cir. 1970); Velasquez v. Rhay, 408 F. 2d 9, 10 (9th Cir. 1969); Cook v. State, 134 Ga. App. 712, 714-15 , 215 S.E.2d 728 (1975); State v. Joao, 533 P. 2d 270, 274 (Hawaii 1975); State v. Dias, 52 Hawaii 100, 105 , 470 P. 2d 510 (1970); People v. Vaglica, 99 Ill.	1	1976–1976
State v. Dias green haw · 1970 2 sentences 1976United States v. Allsenberrie, 424 F. 2d 1209, 1212-14 (7th Cir. 1970); Velasquez v. Rhay, 408 F. 2d 9, 10 (9th Cir. 1969); Cook v. State, 134 Ga. App. 712, 714-15 , 215 S.E.2d 728 (1975); State v. Joao, 533 P. 2d 270, 274 (Hawaii 1975); State v. Dias, 52 Hawaii 100, 105 , 470 P. 2d 510 (1970); People v. Vaglica, 99 Ill. 1976United States v. Allsenberrie, 424 F. 2d 1209, 1212-14 (7th Cir. 1970); Velasquez v. Rhay, 408 F. 2d 9, 10 (9th Cir. 1969); Cook v. State, 134 Ga. App. 712, 714-15 , 215 S.E.2d 728 (1975); State v. Joao, 533 P. 2d 270, 274 (Hawaii 1975); State v. Dias, 52 Hawaii 100, 105 , 470 P. 2d 510 (1970); People v. Vaglica, 99 Ill.	1	1976–1976
Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida green scotus · 1973 1 sentence 1976Nothing announced in Alderman [v. United States, 394 U. S. 165 , 89 S. Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969)], in any manner weakens the vitality of the Jones rule upon which we rely . ...”); United States v. Love, 472 F. 2d 490, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Fields, 458 F. 2d 1194, 1196 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 927 (1973); United States v. Gargiso, 456 F. 2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Pastore, 456 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. West, 453 F. 2d 1351, 1354-55 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cobb, 432 F. 2d 716, 721-22 (4th Cir. 1970) (The court addres	1	1976–1976
Cook v. State green gactapp · 1975 2 sentences 1976United States v. Allsenberrie, 424 F. 2d 1209, 1212-14 (7th Cir. 1970); Velasquez v. Rhay, 408 F. 2d 9, 10 (9th Cir. 1969); Cook v. State, 134 Ga. App. 712, 714-15 , 215 S.E.2d 728 (1975); State v. Joao, 533 P. 2d 270, 274 (Hawaii 1975); State v. Dias, 52 Hawaii 100, 105 , 470 P. 2d 510 (1970); People v. Vaglica, 99 Ill. 1976United States v. Allsenberrie, 424 F. 2d 1209, 1212-14 (7th Cir. 1970); Velasquez v. Rhay, 408 F. 2d 9, 10 (9th Cir. 1969); Cook v. State, 134 Ga. App. 712, 714-15 , 215 S.E.2d 728 (1975); State v. Joao, 533 P. 2d 270, 274 (Hawaii 1975); State v. Dias, 52 Hawaii 100, 105 , 470 P. 2d 510 (1970); People v. Vaglica, 99 Ill.	1	1976–1976
Staten v. State green mdctspecapp · 1971	1	1973–1973

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MD § Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-403 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 120 (1991–2026) FL 95 (1975–2026) TX 91 (1937–2026) GA 83 (1978–2026) CA 60 (1969–2026) MN 59 (1989–2026) PA 48 (1889–2025) MS 44 (1963–2026) IL 38 (1975–2025) AL 37 (1961–2024) IN 35 (1991–2025) WA 27 (1970–2024) MO 27 (1988–2024) UT 26 (1987–2025) SC 26 (1996–2025) KS 21 (1981–2026) MI 18 (1982–2026) MD 17 (1973–2021) NY 16 (1987–2025) AZ 16 (1978–2020) KY 15 (1938–2025) LA 15 (1964–2024) DC 14 (1978–2016) CO 13 (1992–2025) NC 13 (1998–2014) VA 12 (1976–2025) ID 11 (1970–2025) AR 10 (1997–2021) IA 8 (1972–2025) TN 8 (1933–2024) DE 8 (2008–2025) NE 8 (1983–2026) MA 8 (1979–2024) NJ 7 (1981–2025) NV 6 (1977–2020) SD 6 (1984–2017) OK 6 (1972–2023) CT 6 (1988–2022) MT 6 (1982–2006) AK 5 (1970–1990) WY 5 (1998–2010) WI 5 (1993–2025) NM 5 (1979–2025) ND 4 (1974–2007) WV 3 (1905–2024) RI 2 (1981–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check