7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Jersey City Medical Centergreen1 sentence2002Id. at 774-75. [ Id. at 424-26, 765 A. 2d 217 .] In Shepherd , this court did not decide the appropriate test for assessing aiding and abetting liability since we concluded that summary judgment was improvidently granted where, under either the Tyson and Jones test, a fact-finder could find that defendants were promoting the interests *254 of their employer when they chastised plaintiffs or under the Failla/Hurley test, a fact-finder could find that defendants gave substantial encouragement to the unlawful conduct of their employer. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Salvuccigreen2 sentences1981The Supreme Court reversed and remanded, overruling the Jones rule of "automatic standing." 448 U.S. at 86 , 100 S.Ct. at *223 2550, 65 L.Ed. 2d at 624 . 1981The Supreme Court reversed and remanded, overruling the Jones rule of "automatic standing." 448 U.S. at 86 , 100 S.Ct. at *223 2550, 65 L.Ed. 2d at 624 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jones
green
1 sentence2025Id. at 32-34 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Burt v. W. Jersey Health Systems
green
1 sentence2025The trial court denied the motion, finding the Burt and Jones defendants "'were dismissed meritoriously' and that '[t]here is no basis for dismissal of movant here.'" Id. at 366 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
MERCHANTS IND. CORP., OF NY v. Eggleston
green
1 sentence2021A-1769-19 6 The bases of defendants Jones’s motion were that the reservation of rights letters that were sent to Marciano did not comply with the requirements set forth in Merchants Indemnity Corporation v. Eggleston, 37 N.J. 114 (1962), and that NBIC controlled the defense of the matter for over three years, and NBIC was estopped from denying coverage. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Alston
green
2 sentences2008In Alston, supra, we found the “[U.S.] Supreme Court’s grounds for abandoning the Jones rule of standing unpersuasive.” 88 N.J. at 228 , 440 A.2d 1311 . 2008In Alston, supra, we found the “[U.S.] Supreme Court’s grounds for abandoning the Jones rule of standing unpersuasive.” 88 N.J. at 228 , 440 A.2d 1311 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Shepherd v. Hunterdon Dev. Ctr.
green
2 sentences2002Id. at 774-75. [ Id. at 424-26, 765 A. 2d 217 .] In Shepherd , this court did not decide the appropriate test for assessing aiding and abetting liability since we concluded that summary judgment was improvidently granted where, under either the Tyson and Jones test, a fact-finder could find that defendants were promoting the interests *254 of their employer when they chastised plaintiffs or under the Failla/Hurley test, a fact-finder could find that defendants gave substantial encouragement to the unlawful conduct of their employer. 2002Id. at 426, 765 A. 2d 217 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Byrd v. Manning
neutral
2 sentences2001Like the defendants in Byrd, Id. at 319 , 601 A. 2d 770 , nothing that Regis or any of the priests said or did was for the purpose of deterring or inhibiting plaintiff from instituting a civil action against them. 2001Like the defendants in Byrd, Id. at 319 , 601 A. 2d 770 , nothing that Regis or any of the priests said or did was for the purpose of deterring or inhibiting plaintiff from instituting a civil action against them. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.