Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mathews v. Eldridgegreen2 sentences2007Under the Federal Constitution, analyzing a party’s due process claim requires review of three factors: “First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.” Id. at 335 . 1985We consider three factors: “First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.” Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. at 335 . | 5 | 7 |
In re Richard A.green2 sentences2007In re Richard A., 146 N.H. 295, 298 (2001) (quotation omitted). 2002In re Richard A., 146 N.H. 295, 298 (2001) (quotation omitted). | 4 | 4 |
State v. Vealegreen2 sentences2011State v. Veale, 158 N.H. 632, 639 (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 748 (2009). 2011Veale, 158 N.H. at 639 (quotation omitted); Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Lavoiegreen2 sentences2013State v. Lavoie, 155 N.H. 477, 483 (2007) (quotation omitted). 2013Lavoie, 155 N.H. at 483 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Landrygreen1 sentence2003State v. Landry, 146 N.H. 635, 637 (2001). | 1 | 1 |
In re Browngreen1 sentence2001In re Brown, 126 N.H. 309, 312 (1985) (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Ake v. Oklahomagreen1 sentence1985See also Ake v. Oklahoma, 105 S. Ct. 1087 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Appeal of The Portsmouth Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1985In analyzing what procedures are due in a particular case, we consider the following factors: ‘“First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.’” Appeal of Portsmouth Trust Co., 120 N.H. at 757 , 423 A.2d at 605 (qu 1985In analyzing what procedures are due in a particular case, we consider the following factors: ‘“First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.’” Appeal of Portsmouth Trust Co., 120 N.H. at 757 , 423 A.2d at 605 (qu | 2 | 1983–1985 |
State v. Mwangi
green
1 sentence2021Id. (quotation omitted); see Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In Re Field
green
2 sentences1983We performed a similar analysis (although we spoke in response to a sixth amendment argument) when we held that there was no right to have counsel present at an examination “where the examinee is represented by counsel who saw all relevant documents, was given the opportunity to present his own psychiatric testimony and extensively cross-examined the examining psychiatrist’s basis for recommending involuntary admission. .. .” In re Field, 120 N.H. at 210 , 412 A.2d at 1034 . 1983We performed a similar analysis (although we spoke in response to a sixth amendment argument) when we held that there was no right to have counsel present at an examination “where the examinee is represented by counsel who saw all relevant documents, was given the opportunity to present his own psychiatric testimony and extensively cross-examined the examining psychiatrist’s basis for recommending involuntary admission. .. .” In re Field, 120 N.H. at 210 , 412 A.2d at 1034 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.