16 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1916–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. William S. Morrisgreen1 sentence2022See id. at 431 n.2. | 1 | 1 |
ITT Specialty Risk Services v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.green1 sentence2013See, e.g., ITT Specialty Risk Servs. v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., Inc., 985 P.2d 43, 47 (Colo.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Orejel v. York Intern. Corp., Inc.green2 sentences2004Orejel v. York Int’l Corp., 287 Ill.App.3d 592 , 222 Ill.Dec. 811 , 678 N.E.2d 683, 692 (1997). 2004Orejel v. York Int’l Corp., 287 Ill.App.3d 592 , 222 Ill.Dec. 811 , 678 N.E.2d 683, 692 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Krebillgreen1 sentence1995Id. at 406-07. | 1 | 1 |
National Surety Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.green1 sentence1931See National Surety Co. v. Bankers Trust Co., 210 Iowa 323 . *Page 547 The material provisions of the assignment in the case at bar read as follows: "In Consideration of the sum of $6363.68 in hand paid by the New Amsterdam Casualty Company of Baltimore, Md., receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the County of Monroe, State of Iowa, * * * do hereby sell, set over and assign to the said New Amsterdam Casualty Company of Baltimore, Md., any and all claims, each and all of them (county and county officers) may have against the Iowa Trust Savings Bank of Albia, Monroe County, Iowa, arising out | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kapadia v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1989Co., 418 N.W.2d 848 (Iowa 1988), we held an auto insurance policy with a subrogation clause is consistent with the language and spirit of chapter 516A and that such subro-gation rights can be protected by the use of a consent-to-settlement clause. 1989Co., 418 N.W.2d 848 (Iowa 1988), we held an auto insurance policy with a subrogation clause is consistent with the language and spirit of chapter 516A and that such subrogation rights can be protected by the use of a consent-to-settlement clause. | 5 | 1989–2004 |
Sunshine v. Bankers Trust Co.
green
2 sentences2000In Sunshine v. Bankers Trust Co., 34 N.Y.2d 404 , 358 N.Y.S.2d 113 , 314 N.E.2d 860 (1974), the New York Court of Appeals discussed the application of section 554.4407(c) in situations in which the customer’s account has not in fact been debited. 2000In Sunshine v. Bankers Trust Co., 34 N.Y.2d 404 , 358 N.Y.S.2d 113 , 314 N.E.2d 860 (1974), the New York Court of Appeals discussed the application of section 554.4407(c) in situations in which the customer’s account has not in fact been debited. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Ludwig v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1997Upon full settlement with a third-party tortfeasor, Ludwig resisted the insurer’s subrogation claim, insisting she had not been “made whole.” Id. at 147 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Bales v. Warren County
green
2 sentences1992In Bales v. Warren County, 478 N.W.2d 398 (Iowa 1991), a case involving a subrogation right under a somewhat similar statute, we reduced a subrogation claim by the contributory fault assigned to the injured person. 1992Id. at 401 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Brooks
green
1 sentence1991Brooks, 412 N.W.2d at 616 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
2 sentences1990Co., 106 Wis.2d 263 , 316 N.W.2d 348 (1982)], might be required. 1990Co., 106 Wis.2d 263 , 316 N.W.2d 348 (1982)], might be required. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Lowe Construction Co.
green
2 sentences1970For ease of communication we will consider the Appellant as being Tri-B Corporation and Tom Kolby.” In Hawkeye-Security Company v. Lowe Construction Co., 251 Iowa 27 , 99 N.W.2d 421, 428 , we said: “Defendant has cited a few older precedents from states where contribution is not allowed between joint tort-feasors which hold, in effect, that an indemnitor, subrogee or assignee of one of the tort-feasors acquires no greater right to contribution than the tort-feasor had. 1970For ease of communication we will consider the Appellant as being Tri-B Corporation and Tom Kolby.” In Hawkeye-Security Company v. Lowe Construction Co., 251 Iowa 27 , 99 N.W.2d 421, 428 , we said: “Defendant has cited a few older precedents from states where contribution is not allowed between joint tort-feasors which hold, in effect, that an indemnitor, subrogee or assignee of one of the tort-feasors acquires no greater right to contribution than the tort-feasor had. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
McNamara v. McNamara
neutral
1 sentence1916They cite a number of oases from other jurisdictions, and McNamara v. McNamara, 167 Iowa 479 . | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.