6 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Panea v. Isdanergreen1 sentence2006See Panea, 773 A.2d at 791 . | 1 | 1 |
Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Kelseygreen1 sentence1939See Equitable Trust Co. v. Kelsey, 209 Mass. 416 , cited in the opinion of the majority. | 1 | 1 |
First Taxing District v. National Surety Co.green1 sentence1931See First Taxing District v. National Surety Co., 97 Conn. 639 ; Newell v. Hadley, 206 Mass. 335 ; Moore & Sinott v. Watson, 20 R. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Great American Insurance Company v. United States
green
1 sentence1980The United States is not a party to that contract of indemnity and the insurer’s right as a compensated indemnitor to recover the loss it has incurred is fixed by the policy’s subrogation clause, which in effect makes Great American an assignee subject to whatever defenses the tortfeasor may have against the insured.” Id. at 1033-34 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Hospital Service Corp. v. Pennsylvania Insurance
green
1 sentence1972In that opinion at 715, 227 A.2d at 110 , the court approved the subrogation provision as tending to reduce subscription rates and avoiding “* * * a windfall for those few who may be greedy or overreaching.” If a subrogation clause is a valid and reasonable provision in a medical service contract for adults, there appears to be no compelling reason why it should not be binding on children. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Doyle v. Giuliucci
green
2 sentences1972The Supreme Court of California was faced with an analogous problem in Doyle v. Giuliucci, 62 Cal.2d 606 , 401 P.2d 1 , 43 Cal. Rptr. 697 (1965). 1972The Supreme Court of California was faced with an analogous problem in Doyle v. Giuliucci, 62 Cal.2d 606 , 401 P.2d 1 , 43 Cal. Rptr. 697 (1965). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Newell v. Hadley
green
1 sentence1931See First Taxing District v. National Surety Co., 97 Conn. 639 ; Newell v. Hadley, 206 Mass. 335 ; Moore & Sinott v. Watson, 20 R. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Leavitt v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
green
1 sentence1928Co., 90 Me. 153 ; Conn. Mutual Life Ins. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.