careful analysis in New Mexico

1983In General Motors Corporation v. Washington, 377 U.S. 436 , 84 S.Ct. 1564 , 12 L.Ed.2d 430 (1964), the United States Supreme Court addressed the imposition .of a gross receipts tax as follows: A careful analysis of the cases in this field teaches that the validity of the tax rests upon whether the State is exacting a constitutionally fair demand for that aspect of interstate commerce to which it bears a special relation.

1983In General Motors Corporation v. Washington, 377 U.S. 436 , 84 S.Ct. 1564 , 12 L.Ed.2d 430 (1964), the United States Supreme Court addressed the imposition .of a gross receipts tax as follows: A careful analysis of the cases in this field teaches that the validity of the tax rests upon whether the State is exacting a constitutionally fair demand for that aspect of interstate commerce to which it bears a special relation.

1986Whether analyzed in terms of equal protection or due process, the issue cannot be resolved by resort to easy slogans or pigeonhole *781 analysis, but rather requires a careful inquiry into such factors as "the nature of the individual interest affected, the extent to which it is affected, the rationality of the connection between legislative means and purpose, [and] the existence of alternative means for effectuating the purpose * * *." Williams v. Illinois, supra, at 260 [ 90 S.Ct. at 2031 ] * * * (Harlan, J., concurring).

1986Whether analyzed in terms of equal protection or due process, the issue cannot be resolved by resort to easy slogans or pigeonhole analysis, but rather requires a careful inquiry into such factors as “the nature of the individual interest affected, the extent to which it is affected, the rationality of the connection between legislative means and purpose, [and] the existence of alternative means for effectuating the purpose * * Williams v. Illinois, supra, at 260 [ 90 S.Ct. at 2031 ] * * * (Harlan, J., concurring).

1977Ruhe v. Abren, 1 N.M. 247 (1857).

1977This rule prevailed in New Mexico until 1954 when this court in State v. White, 58 N.M. 324 , 270 P.2d 727 (1954) made a careful analysis of the authorities and made a limited extension of the M’Naghten rule, adding a third ingredient.

1977This rule prevailed in New Mexico until 1954 when this court in State v. White, 58 N.M. 324 , 270 P.2d 727 (1954) made a careful analysis of the authorities and made a limited extension of the M’Naghten rule, adding a third ingredient.

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1973Sufficient time will be allowed for answering the questions to permit the applicant to make a careful analysis of the facts and to prepare well-reasoned answers.” See also, Application of Peterson, 459 P.2d 703 , 39 A.L.R.3d 708 (Alaska, 1969); Staley v. State Bar of California, 17 Cal.2d 119 , 109 P.2d 667 (1941); Salot v. State Bar of California, 3 Cal.2d 615 , 45 P.2d 203 (1935); In re Avery’s Petition, 44 Hawaii 597 , 358 P.2d 709 (1961); In re Reid’s Petition, 76 Nev. 76 , 349 P.2d 446 (1960).

1966Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, supra; Panagos v. United States, 324 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.); Moore v. [State of] Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 , 78 S.Ct. 191 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 167 .” A careful analysis of three recent decisions of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sandoval v. Tinsley, supra; Lovato v. Cox, supra, and Shawan v. Cox, 350 F.2d 909 , all involving waiver of counsel, places the instant case in the category of Sandoval and Lovato, which upheld waivers of counsel, rather than Shawan, which did not.

1966Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, supra; Panagos v. United States, 324 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.); Moore v. [State of] Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 , 78 S.Ct. 191 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 167 .” A careful analysis of three recent decisions of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sandoval v. Tinsley, supra; Lovato v. Cox, supra, and Shawan v. Cox, 350 F.2d 909 , all involving waiver of counsel, places the instant case in the category of Sandoval and Lovato, which upheld waivers of counsel, rather than Shawan, which did not.

1966In Carpentier v. Lainson, 248 Iowa 1275 , 84 N.W.2d 32 , 71 A.L.R.2d 1151 , the trial court, in a habeas corpus hearing, held that a 17 year old boy could not waive the right to counsel, basing its decision on age alone.

1966In Carpentier v. Lainson, 248 Iowa 1275 , 84 N.W.2d 32 , 71 A.L.R.2d 1151 , the trial court, in a habeas corpus hearing, held that a 17 year old boy could not waive the right to counsel, basing its decision on age alone.

1966Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, supra; Panagos v. United States, 324 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.); Moore v. [State of] Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 , 78 S.Ct. 191 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 167 .” A careful analysis of three recent decisions of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sandoval v. Tinsley, supra; Lovato v. Cox, supra, and Shawan v. Cox, 350 F.2d 909 , all involving waiver of counsel, places the instant case in the category of Sandoval and Lovato, which upheld waivers of counsel, rather than Shawan, which did not.

1966Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, supra; Panagos v. United States, 324 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.); Moore v. [State of] Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 , 78 S.Ct. 191 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 167 .” A careful analysis of three recent decisions of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sandoval v. Tinsley, supra; Lovato v. Cox, supra, and Shawan v. Cox, 350 F.2d 909 , all involving waiver of counsel, places the instant case in the category of Sandoval and Lovato, which upheld waivers of counsel, rather than Shawan, which did not.

1966Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, supra; Panagos v. United States, 324 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.); Moore v. [State of] Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 , 78 S.Ct. 191 , 2 L.Ed.2d 167 ." A careful analysis of three recent decisions of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sandoval v. Tinsley, supra; Lovato v. Cox, supra, and Shawan v. Cox, 350 F.2d 909 , all involving waiver of counsel, places the instant case in the category of Sandoval and Lovato, which upheld waivers of counsel, rather than Shawan, which did not.

1966Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, supra; Panagos v. United States, 324 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.); Moore v. [State of] Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 , 78 S.Ct. 191 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 167 .” A careful analysis of three recent decisions of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sandoval v. Tinsley, supra; Lovato v. Cox, supra, and Shawan v. Cox, 350 F.2d 909 , all involving waiver of counsel, places the instant case in the category of Sandoval and Lovato, which upheld waivers of counsel, rather than Shawan, which did not.

1966Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, supra; Panagos v. United States, 324 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.); Moore v. [State of] Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 , 78 S.Ct. 191 , 2 L.Ed.2d 167 ." A careful analysis of three recent decisions of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sandoval v. Tinsley, supra; Lovato v. Cox, supra, and Shawan v. Cox, 350 F.2d 909 , all involving waiver of counsel, places the instant case in the category of Sandoval and Lovato, which upheld waivers of counsel, rather than Shawan, which did not.

1966Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, supra; Panagos v. United States, 324 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.); Moore v. [State of] Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 , 78 S.Ct. 191 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 167 .” A careful analysis of three recent decisions of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sandoval v. Tinsley, supra; Lovato v. Cox, supra, and Shawan v. Cox, 350 F.2d 909 , all involving waiver of counsel, places the instant case in the category of Sandoval and Lovato, which upheld waivers of counsel, rather than Shawan, which did not.

1948We think it was intended that all of the lots in the Subdivision be used for residential purposes and that the words ‘only one dwelling (except servants’ quarters) ’ meant that only a dwelling house could be constructed on any of the lots in the Subdivision.” The covenant construed in Meyer v. Stein, 284 Ky. 497 , 145 S.W.2d 105 , recited that the property conveyed “shall be used only for the erection of a single residence and no residence shall be erected thereon that shall cost less than $5000”.

1948We think it was intended that all of the lots in the Subdivision be used for residential purposes and that the words ‘only one dwelling (except servants’ quarters) ’ meant that only a dwelling house could be constructed on any of the lots in the Subdivision.” The covenant construed in Meyer v. Stein, 284 Ky. 497 , 145 S.W.2d 105 , recited that the property conveyed “shall be used only for the erection of a single residence and no residence shall be erected thereon that shall cost less than $5000”.

1941The Supreme Court of Idaho handed down its decision in Sonson v. Arbogast, September 28, 1939, 60 Idaho 582 , 94 P.2d 672 , holding; "Streptococcus pneumonia causing death of dairy employee was not caused by `accident' so as to make the death compensable, notwithstanding evidence that sudden changes in temperature incurred in the course of employee's duties made the disease a natural consequence of the work, in absence of showing that there was some noticeable mishap, fortuitous incident, or sudden or manifest change in working conditions." Citing Moody v. State Highway Department, supra, the

1941The Supreme Court of Idaho handed down its decision in Sonson v. Arbogast, September 28, 1939, 60 Idaho 582 , 94 P.2d 672 , holding; "Streptococcus pneumonia causing death of dairy employee was not caused by `accident' so as to make the death compensable, notwithstanding evidence that sudden changes in temperature incurred in the course of employee's duties made the disease a natural consequence of the work, in absence of showing that there was some noticeable mishap, fortuitous incident, or sudden or manifest change in working conditions." Citing Moody v. State Highway Department, supra, the

1937A careful analysis of these cases in the light of what is said in Blumenstock Brothers Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Company, 252 U.S. 436 , 40 S.Ct. 385, 387 , 64 L.Ed. 649 , and in Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 , 19 L.Ed. 357 , and in other cases cited and relied upon in the Blumenstock Case, fails to persuade us that the advertising contracts themselves, although made between citizens of different states, are transactions in interstate commerce.

1937A careful analysis of these cases in the light of what is said in Blumenstock Brothers Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Company, 252 U.S. 436 , 40 S.Ct. 385, 387 , 64 L.Ed. 649 , and in Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 , 19 L.Ed. 357 , and in other cases cited and relied upon in the Blumenstock Case, fails to persuade us that the advertising contracts themselves, although made between citizens of different states, are transactions in interstate commerce.

1937A careful analysis of these cases in the light of what is said in Blumenstock Brothers Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Company, 252 U.S. 436 , 40 S.Ct. 385, 387 , 64 L.Ed. 649 , and in Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 , 19 L.Ed. 357 , and in other cases cited and relied upon in the Blumenstock Case, fails to persuade us that the advertising contracts themselves, although made between citizens of different states, are transactions in interstate commerce.

1937A careful analysis of these cases in the light of what is said in Blumenstock Brothers Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Company, 252 U.S. 436 , 40 S.Ct. 385, 387 , 64 L.Ed. 649 , and in Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 , 19 L.Ed. 357 , and in other cases cited and relied upon in the Blumenstock Case, fails to persuade us that the advertising contracts themselves, although made between citizens of different states, are transactions in interstate commerce.