careful analysis in Oklahoma

2003Auth., 445 P.2d 412 (syllabus ¶ 3) (Okla. 1968). ¶ 12 Careful analysis of the terms "agency" and "public officer" was undertaken in A.G.

1982In Deason v. State, 576 P.2d 778 (Okl.Cr. 1978), this Court quoting from Battle v. State, 478 P.2d 1005 (Okl.Cr. 1970), held that the right of argument contemplates a liberal freedom of speech and that the range of discussion, illustration and argumentation is wide.

1982In Deason v. State, 576 P.2d 778 (Okl.Cr.1978), this Court quoting from Battle v. State, 478 P.2d 1005 (Okl.Cr.1970), held that the right of argument contemplates a liberal freedom of speech and that the range of discussion, illustration and argumentation is wide.

1982In Deason v. State, 576 P.2d 778 (Okl.Cr. 1978), this Court quoting from Battle v. State, 478 P.2d 1005 (Okl.Cr. 1970), held that the right of argument contemplates a liberal freedom of speech and that the range of discussion, illustration and argumentation is wide.

1982In Deason v. State, 576 P.2d 778 (Okl.Cr.1978), this Court quoting from Battle v. State, 478 P.2d 1005 (Okl.Cr.1970), held that the right of argument contemplates a liberal freedom of speech and that the range of discussion, illustration and argumentation is wide.

1971In Harris v. State, 74 Okl.Cr. 13 , 122 P.2d 401 (1942), this Court provided: "Only one offense may be stated in an information; but where the same acts may constitute different offenses or the proof may be uncertain as to which of the two or more offenses the accused may be guilty of, the different offenses may be set forth in separate counts in the same information; and the accused may be convicted of either offense.

1971In Harris v. State, 74 Okl.Cr. 13 , 122 P.2d 401 (1942), this Court provided: “Only one offense may be stated in an information; but where the same acts may constitute different offenses or the proof may be uncertain as to which of the two or more offenses the accused may be guilty of, the different offenses may be set forth in separate counts in the same information; and the accused may be convicted of either offense.

1971In Harris v. State, 74 Okl.Cr. 13 , 122 P.2d 401 (1942), this Court provided: "Only one offense may be stated in an information; but where the same acts may constitute different offenses or the proof may be uncertain as to which of the two or more offenses the accused may be guilty of, the different offenses may be set forth in separate counts in the same information; and the accused may be convicted of either offense.

1971In Harris v. State, 74 Okl.Cr. 13 , 122 P.2d 401 (1942), this Court provided: “Only one offense may be stated in an information; but where the same acts may constitute different offenses or the proof may be uncertain as to which of the two or more offenses the accused may be guilty of, the different offenses may be set forth in separate counts in the same information; and the accused may be convicted of either offense.

1969Such a tax was held valid in Pawnee County Excise Board v. Kurn (1940), 187 Okl. 110 , 101 P.2d 614 .

1969Such a tax was held valid in Pawnee County Excise Board v. Kurn (1940), 187 Okl. 110 , 101 P.2d 614 .

1956The Supreme Court of Kansas in Watson v. Watson, 104 Kan. 578 , 180 P. 242 , 182 P. 643 , laid down the following rule: “An antenuptial contract must be upheld unless some fraud, deceit, or unreasonable inadequacy or disproportion appears.

1956The Supreme Court of Kansas in Watson v. Watson, 104 Kan. 578 , 180 P. 242 , 182 P. 643 , laid down the following rule: “An antenuptial contract must be upheld unless some fraud, deceit, or unreasonable inadequacy or disproportion appears.

1948S. A. 1941 § 716: “ ‘Every killing of one human being by the act, procurement or culpable negligence of another, which, under the provisions of this chapter, is not murder, nor manslaughter in the first degree, nor excusable nor justifiable homicide, is manslaughter in the second degree.’ “A careful analysis of these statutes has been made in the case of New v. Territory, supra [ 12 Okla. 172 , 70 P. 198 ].

1948S. A. 1941 § 716: “ ‘Every killing of one human being by the act, procurement or culpable negligence of another, which, under the provisions of this chapter, is not murder, nor manslaughter in the first degree, nor excusable nor justifiable homicide, is manslaughter in the second degree.’ “A careful analysis of these statutes has been made in the case of New v. Territory, supra [ 12 Okla. 172 , 70 P. 198 ].

1948In Howerton v. Callaway, Carey & Foster, 175 Okla. 311 , 52 P. 2d 845 , construing a contract for the sale of real estate where the purchase price was payable in installments, and the obligation of the owner was to furnish a good and valid title, we said: “Defendant in his brief takes the position that the delivery of the deed by the defendant was an obligation to be concurrent with the payment of the final cash installment of $5,500 by plaintiff.

1948In Howerton v. Callaway, Carey & Foster, 175 Okla. 311 , 52 P. 2d 845 , construing a contract for the sale of real estate where the purchase price was payable in installments, and the obligation of the owner was to furnish a good and valid title, we said: “Defendant in his brief takes the position that the delivery of the deed by the defendant was an obligation to be concurrent with the payment of the final cash installment of $5,500 by plaintiff.

1943(Notice in this connection Ingram v. Jones, 47 F. 2d 135 , as well as Empire Trust Co. v. Brooks, supra.) Thus the proceeding and issues in the cause first filed in Pottawatomie county, insofar as they antedate the proceedings in Tulsa county, demand careful consideration in this proceeding.

1939Upon this point the late Justice Thacker, in the case of City of Shawnee v. Cheek, supra, after a careful analysis of the adjudications on the subject, made the following sound deductions: “ ‘A principle that appears to he deduei-ble from much of the case law on the subject allowing recovery is that it is not only the duty of a landowner to a trespasser to not injure him intentionally or wantonly, but that an act or omission involving a reckless indifference to the safety of reasonably anticipated technical trespassers, such as children of tender years, although without intent to injure, may b

1939Upon this point the late Justice Thacker, in the case of City of Shawnee v. Cheek, supra, after a careful analysis of the adjudications on the subject, made the following sound deductions: “ ‘A principle that appears to he deduei-ble from much of the case law on the subject allowing recovery is that it is not only the duty of a landowner to a trespasser to not injure him intentionally or wantonly, but that an act or omission involving a reckless indifference to the safety of reasonably anticipated technical trespassers, such as children of tender years, although without intent to injure, may b

1935That is to say, in this case, on the wording and phraseology of the letters in question, counsel for the defendant seems to place great reliance on the case of Hanson v. Towle, 19 Kan. 273 , for the reason, as they say, and correctly so, that our statute is taken fr;om Kansas, However, the rule laid down in the Hanson v. Towle Case has been greatly modified and has been repudiated not only in the case of Elder v. Dyer, 26 Kan. 604 , 40 Am.

1935That is to say, in this case, on the wording and phraseology of the letters in question, counsel for the defendant seems to place great reliance on the case of Hanson v. Towle, 19 Kan. 273 , for the reason, as they say, and correctly so, that our statute is taken fr;om Kansas, However, the rule laid down in the Hanson v. Towle Case has been greatly modified and has been repudiated not only in the case of Elder v. Dyer, 26 Kan. 604 , 40 Am.

1921The case of Stahl v. Stahl, 220 Ill. 188 , supra, relied upon by defendant in error, is a decision based on chancery practice.

1919Out of the many cases growing out of this unhappy controversy,- the following have reached this court: Barnes and Dalton v. Lynch, 9 Okla. 156 , 59 Pac. 995 ; Myatt v. Ponca City Land & Improvement Co., 14 Okla. 189 , 78 Pac. 185 , 68 L.

1919Out of the many cases growing out of this unhappy controversy,- the following have reached this court: Barnes and Dalton v. Lynch, 9 Okla. 156 , 59 Pac. 995 ; Myatt v. Ponca City Land & Improvement Co., 14 Okla. 189 , 78 Pac. 185 , 68 L.

1919Out of the many cases growing out of this unhappy controversy,- the following have reached this court: Barnes and Dalton v. Lynch, 9 Okla. 156 , 59 Pac. 995 ; Myatt v. Ponca City Land & Improvement Co., 14 Okla. 189 , 78 Pac. 185 , 68 L.

1919Out of the many cases growing out of this unhappy controversy,- the following have reached this court: Barnes and Dalton v. Lynch, 9 Okla. 156 , 59 Pac. 995 ; Myatt v. Ponca City Land & Improvement Co., 14 Okla. 189 , 78 Pac. 185 , 68 L.

1916Co. v. Nagle, 55 Okla. 235 , 154 Pac. 667 . *31 There seems to be a well-defined exception to the above rule in those cases where the horse is not running away, but is momentarily beyond the control of the driver at the time the injury occurs; and there' are several cases in which a different rule appears to have been adhered to, but upon a careful analysis of such cases, such different rule is due to the facts that distinguish that class of cases from the one under consideration.

1916Co. v. Nagle, 55 Okla. 235 , 154 Pac. 667 . *31 There seems to be a well-defined exception to the above rule in those cases where the horse is not running away, but is momentarily beyond the control of the driver at the time the injury occurs; and there' are several cases in which a different rule appears to have been adhered to, but upon a careful analysis of such cases, such different rule is due to the facts that distinguish that class of cases from the one under consideration.