Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1916–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Turnergreen2 sentences1953See State v. Turner, 117 S. C. 470, 109 S. E. 119 ; State v. Kimbrell, 191 S. C. 238, 4 S. E. (2d) 121 ; State v. Manis, 214 S. C. 99, 51 S. E. (2d) 370 . 1939As was stated in State v. Turner et al., 117 S. C., 470, 109 S. E., 119 , as to the defendant, Mack Turner: “Neither the evidence nor the circumstances warrant his conviction; while the whole ciase raised a suspicion, and a grave one at that, it does not warrant a verdict of guilty.” “Admitting as true every fact and circumstance relied on by the State, without reference to whether it was competent or not, there is not sufficient evidence to warrant the conviction of Mack Turner (appellant), and his Honor was in error in not directing a verdict of not guilty as to him.” Reversed and remanded w | 1 | 2 |
State v. Torrencegreen2 sentences2006See State v. Torrence, 305 S.C. 45, 69 , 406 S.E.2d 315, 328 (1991) (abolishing in favorem vitae review in capital cases). 2006See State v. Torrence, 305 S.C. 45, 69 , 406 S.E.2d 315, 328 (1991) (abolishing in favorem vitae review in capital cases). | 1 | 1 |
Nucor Steel v. South Carolina Public Service Commissiongreen2 sentences1997See Nucor Steel v. South Carolina Public Service Comm’n, 310 S.C. 539 , 426 S.E.2d 319 (1992) (To give effect to a statute, a court cannot *558 adopt a position which defeats its underlying legislative purpose.); Smalls v. Weed, 293 S.C. 364 , 360 S.E.2d 531 (Ct.App.1987) (A statute must be read as a whole, and sections which are part of the same general statutory law must be construed together.). 1997See Nucor Steel v. South Carolina Public Service Comm’n, 310 S.C. 539 , 426 S.E.2d 319 (1992) (To give effect to a statute, a court cannot *558 adopt a position which defeats its underlying legislative purpose.); Smalls v. Weed, 293 S.C. 364 , 360 S.E.2d 531 (Ct.App.1987) (A statute must be read as a whole, and sections which are part of the same general statutory law must be construed together.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Katherine Susan Lowe
green
2 sentences2011The plaintiff sued her employer and two of its managers in the state court of North Carolina. 102 F.3d at 732 . 2011The plaintiff sued her employer and two of its managers in the state court of North Carolina. 102 F.3d at 732 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Jarrell v. Petoseed Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences2001In considering relief from a final judgment, “the balance is drawn between finality of judgments, on the one hand, and preserving the court’s fundamental purpose of providing a fair and just resolution of disputes, on the other.” Hagy, 331 S.C. at 221 , 500 S.E.2d at 172 . 2001In considering relief from a final judgment, “the balance is drawn between finality of judgments, on the one hand, and preserving the court’s fundamental purpose of providing a fair and just resolution of disputes, on the other.” Hagy, 331 S.C. at 221 , 500 S.E.2d at 172 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Smalls v. Weed
green
2 sentences1997See Nucor Steel v. South Carolina Public Service Comm’n, 310 S.C. 539 , 426 S.E.2d 319 (1992) (To give effect to a statute, a court cannot *558 adopt a position which defeats its underlying legislative purpose.); Smalls v. Weed, 293 S.C. 364 , 360 S.E.2d 531 (Ct.App.1987) (A statute must be read as a whole, and sections which are part of the same general statutory law must be construed together.). 1997See Nucor Steel v. South Carolina Public Service Comm’n, 310 S.C. 539 , 426 S.E.2d 319 (1992) (To give effect to a statute, a court cannot *558 adopt a position which defeats its underlying legislative purpose.); Smalls v. Weed, 293 S.C. 364 , 360 S.E.2d 531 (Ct.App.1987) (A statute must be read as a whole, and sections which are part of the same general statutory law must be construed together.). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire Insurance
green
2 sentences1972Co., 276 N. C. 348 , 172 S. E. (2d) 518 (1970). 1972Co., 276 N. C. 348 , 172 S. E. (2d) 518 (1970). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State v. Manis
green
1 sentence1953See State v. Turner, 117 S. C. 470, 109 S. E. 119 ; State v. Kimbrell, 191 S. C. 238, 4 S. E. (2d) 121 ; State v. Manis, 214 S. C. 99, 51 S. E. (2d) 370 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State v. Kimbrell
green
1 sentence1953See State v. Turner, 117 S. C. 470, 109 S. E. 119 ; State v. Kimbrell, 191 S. C. 238, 4 S. E. (2d) 121 ; State v. Manis, 214 S. C. 99, 51 S. E. (2d) 370 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Rivers v. v. P. Loftis Co.
neutral
1 sentence1949P. Lojtis Co. et al., 214 S. C. 162, 51 S. E. (2d) 510 .” Here, however, medical testimony alone is not relied upon as a careful analysis of the evidence discloses that deceased was found in a dying condition where his duty required him to be, that immediately prior thereto he was operating the machine which subsequently was found to be charged with electricity to such an extent that another employee was knocked forcibly from this machine, that the motor operating the hoist and attached to the frame was defective causing the machine to be charged with electricity, that the amount of current on | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Savage v. Cannon
green
1 sentence1946Careful analysis of this important power of the court to relieve from default is also found in the more recent case of Savage v. Cannon, 204 S. C., 473, 30 S. E. (2d), 70 . | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Addison v. Duncan
neutral
1 sentence1936Applying Rule 58 of the Circuit Court (this rule being also applicable to the Orangeburg County Court), and the interpretation of the rule as laid down in Addison v. Duncan, supra, Beckham v. Southern Railway Co., supra, and Sirgany v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, supra, upon a careful analysis of the pleadings in this case, the writer hereof is of the opinion that appellant was entitled to open and reply. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Sirgany v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
neutral
1 sentence1936Applying Rule 58 of the Circuit Court (this rule being also applicable to the Orangeburg County Court), and the interpretation of the rule as laid down in Addison v. Duncan, supra, Beckham v. Southern Railway Co., supra, and Sirgany v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, supra, upon a careful analysis of the pleadings in this case, the writer hereof is of the opinion that appellant was entitled to open and reply. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.
green
1 sentence1924The most important new provision (as was said by the Chief Justice) in the Wisconsin Passenger Fare Case, 257 *26 U. S., 563; 42 Sup. Ct. 232; 66 L. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Forrester v. Moon
green
1 sentence1916A careful analysis of the whole evidence fails to convince us that the master and Circuit Court were in error or that the preponderance of the testimony establishes the contention of the appellant. *309 All exceptions are overruled under Hickson Lumber Co. v. Stallings, 91 S. C. 473, 74 S. E. 1072 ; Forrester v. Moon, 100 S. C. 157, 84 S. E. 532 . | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Hickson Lumber Co. v. Stallings
green
1 sentence1916A careful analysis of the whole evidence fails to convince us that the master and Circuit Court were in error or that the preponderance of the testimony establishes the contention of the appellant. *309 All exceptions are overruled under Hickson Lumber Co. v. Stallings, 91 S. C. 473, 74 S. E. 1072 ; Forrester v. Moon, 100 S. C. 157, 84 S. E. 532 . | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.