16 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Blackgreen2 sentences2008See State v. Black, 524 S.W.2d 913, 918-20 (Tenn. 1975). 1997See State v. Black, 524 S.W.2d 913, 918-20 (Tenn. 1975). | 4 | 4 |
State v. Crookgreen1 sentence2004While it is error for a trial court, absent a hearing, to impose a greater term in the event of a violation of the conditions of a Community Corrections sentence, as provided in State v. Crook, 2 S.W.3d 238, 241 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Poole v. Stategreen2 sentences1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language.” Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). 1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language." Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). | 1 | 1 |
Strader v. Stategreen2 sentences1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language.” Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). 1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language.” Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). | 1 | 1 |
Greer v. Stategreen1 sentence1994State v. Black, 524 S.W.2d 913, 919-20 (Tenn.1975); Greer v. State, 539 S.W.2d 855, 858 (Tenn.Crim.App.), cer t. denied, (Tenn.1976). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Littlegreen1 sentence1983See State v. Little, 560 S.W.2d 403 , (Tenn.1978). | 1 | 1 |
Gardner's Masonry Contractors, Inc. v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.green2 sentences1976On the other hand we hold it matters not whether the plaintiff's negligence be gross or simple, if that negligence is spent, and does not continue as a causal factor, the doctrine of last clear chance may be asserted against the defendant if it is otherwise applicable." 470 S.W.2d at 948, 949 . 1976On the other hand we hold it matters not whether the plaintiff’s negligence be gross or simple, if that negligence is spent, and does not continue as a causal factor, the doctrine of last clear chance may be asserted against the defendant if it is otherwise applicable.” 470 S.W.2d at 948, 949 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Franks v. Delaware
green
2 sentences2026Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56 . 1980In the event that at that hearing the allegation of perjury or reckless disregard is established by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence, and, with the affidavit’s false material set to one side, the affidavit’s remaining content is insufficient to establish probable cause, the search warrant must be voided and the fruits of the search excluded to the same extent as if probable cause was lacking on the face of the affidavit.” Franks v. Delaware, 98 S.Ct. at 2676 -2677 When we examine the affidavit in light of these rules, we conclude the statement in section three, though false, wa | 4 | 1980–2026 |
State v. Adkisson
green
1 sentence2000Adkisson, 899 S.W.2d at 642 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Potter v. State
green
2 sentences1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language.” Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). 1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language." Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Frazier v. State
green
2 sentences1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language.” Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). 1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language." Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Templeton v. State
neutral
2 sentences1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language.” Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). 1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language." Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Jones v. State
neutral
2 sentences1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language.” Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). 1998Our cases have expressed this rule in variant language." Id. at 679 , 362 S.W.2d at 228-29 (emphasis added)(citing Poole v. State, 61 Tenn. 288, 294 (1872); Potter v. State, 85 Tenn. 88, 98 , 1 S.W. 614 , 618 (1886); Frazier v. State, 117 Tenn. 430, 440-41 , 100 S.W. 94 , 96-97 (1907); Jones v. State, 128 Tenn. 493, 495-98 , 161 S.W. 1016 , 1016-17 (1913); and Templeton v. State, 146 Tenn. 272, 280 , 240 S.W. 789 , 791 (1922)). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Walton
green
1 sentence1998These Virginia cases state that the insurer need not show that it has been prejudiced in the event that the violation of the notice clause is “substantial and material.” Id.; Walton, 423 S.E.2d at 192 . 13 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Pelayo
green
2 sentences1996State v. Black, 524 S.W.2d 913, 919-20 (Tenn.1975); State v. Pelayo, 881 S.W.2d at 10 . 1996State v. Black, 524 S.W.2d 913, 919-20 (Tenn. 1975); State v. Pelayo, 881 S.W.2d at 10 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Deere & Co. v. Allphin
green
1 sentence1980The court noted that the key question to resolving both these issues was simply this: “Did Deere exercise in Illinois any right of ownership over the printed materials, which would amount to a use taxable by the State, before the materials entered the stream of interstate commerce?” 7 Ill.Dec. at 131 , 364 N.E.2d at 118 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State v. Gaddis
green
1 sentence1977If the analysis demonstrates they are not controlled substances, a new trial will be t awarded.” State v. Gaddis, supra at 70 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.