Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People ex rel. K.W.green2 sentences2016The statute requires that the obviously offensive display "tend[ ] to incite an immediate breach of the peace." People in Interest of K.W. , 2012 COA 151 , ¶ 29, 317 P.3d 1237 (quoting § 18-9-106(1)(a), C.R.S. 2016 ). 2016The statute requires that the obviously offensive display "tend[ ] to incite an immediate breach of the peace." People in Interest of K.W. , 2012 COA 151 , ¶ 29, 317 P.3d 1237 (quoting § 18-9-106(1)(a), C.R.S. 2016 ). | 1 | 2 |
People v. Marujogreen2 sentences2025See, e.g. , People v. Marujo , 192 P.3d 1003, 1004, 1007-08 ( Colo. 2008 ) (treating the initial stop of a suspect and the officer's patdown request as a single encounter for purposes of determining whether the encounter was consensual) . ¶55 By bifurcating the event and also its analysis in this manner, the majority disregards the rest of the encounter between Ganaway and the officers in evaluating whether this short but charged encounter was consensual. 2025See, e.g. , People v. Marujo , 192 P.3d 1003, 1004, 1007-08 (Colo. 2008) (treating the initial stop of a suspect and the officer's patdown request as a single encounter for purposes of determining whether the encounter was consensual). ¶55 By bifurcating the event and also its analysis in this manner, the majority disregards the rest of the encounter between Ganaway and the officers in evaluating whether this short but charged encounter was consensual. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Curtisgreen1 sentence2014Compare People v. Curtis, 681 P.2d 504, 514 (Colo.1984) (requiring trial courts to advise defendants regarding their right to testify), with Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Rugendorf v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1982In the event that at that hearing the allegation of perjury or reckless disregard is established by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence, and, with the affidavit’s false material set to one side, the affidavit’s remaining content is insufficient to establish probable cause, the search warrant must be voided and the fruits of the search excluded to the same extent as if probable cause was lacking on the face of the affidavit. 438 U.S. at 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. at 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d at 672 ; see Rugendorf v. United States, 376 U.S. 528 , 84 S.Ct. 825 , 11 L.Ed.2d 887 (1964). 1982In the event that at that hearing the allegation of perjury or reckless disregard is established by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence, and, with the affidavit’s false material set to one side, the affidavit’s remaining content is insufficient to establish probable cause, the search warrant must be voided and the fruits of the search excluded to the same extent as if probable cause was lacking on the face of the affidavit. 438 U.S. at 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. at 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d at 672 ; see Rugendorf v. United States, 376 U.S. 528 , 84 S.Ct. 825 , 11 L.Ed.2d 887 (1964). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena for Verplankgreen1 sentence1975See In re Verplank, 329 F.Supp. 433 (C.D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Kadell
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Baker v. Young
green
1 sentence2000In Baker v. Young, supra, the court held that the insurer's obligation to indemnify and defend an insured is contractual in nature and provides the insured with the right to a defense in the event a claim is made against the insured and the right to indemnification, up to the limits of the policy, in the event an adverse judgment is entered against the insured. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Franks v. Delaware
green
2 sentences1982In the event that at that hearing the allegation of perjury or reckless disregard is established by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence, and, with the affidavit’s false material set to one side, the affidavit’s remaining content is insufficient to establish probable cause, the search warrant must be voided and the fruits of the search excluded to the same extent as if probable cause was lacking on the face of the affidavit. 438 U.S. at 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. at 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d at 672 ; see Rugendorf v. United States, 376 U.S. 528 , 84 S.Ct. 825 , 11 L.Ed.2d 887 (1964). 1982In the event that at that hearing the allegation of perjury or reckless disregard is established by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence, and, with the affidavit’s false material set to one side, the affidavit’s remaining content is insufficient to establish probable cause, the search warrant must be voided and the fruits of the search excluded to the same extent as if probable cause was lacking on the face of the affidavit. 438 U.S. at 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. at 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d at 672 ; see Rugendorf v. United States, 376 U.S. 528 , 84 S.Ct. 825 , 11 L.Ed.2d 887 (1964). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.