6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Goldberg v. Kelly
green
2 sentences2009Id. 2009Id. | 3 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Moore
green
1 sentence2000The test for harmless error is “whether a reviewing court can find beyond a reasonable doubt that the jury would have reached the same result without the admission of the challenged evidence.” Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Franks v. Delaware
green
2 sentences1991Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-156 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). 1991Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-156 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Lindner
green
2 sentences1984Our Supreme Court applied this rule in State v. Lindner, 100 Idaho 37 , 592 P.2d 852 (1979). 1984Our Supreme Court applied this rule in State v. Lindner, 100 Idaho 37 , 592 P.2d 852 (1979). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.