event violation in Oregon

2013However, this court will look to later-enacted statutes as “strong evidence” that, “when the legislature intends to condition [the operation of a statute on a certain event or requirement], it knows how to express that intention.” Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co., 332 Or 226, 233 , 26 P3d 817 (2001).

2013However, this court will look to later-enacted statutes as “strong evidence” that, “when the legislature intends to condition [the operation of a statute on a certain event or requirement], it knows how to express that intention.” Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co., 332 Or 226, 233 , 26 P3d 817 (2001).

2012For example, in State v. Barrett, 331 Or 27 , 10 P3d 901 (2000), the trial court had imposed consecutive life sentences for two aggravated murder convictions involving the same victim.

2012For example, in State v. Barrett, 331 Or 27 , 10 P3d 901 (2000), the trial court had imposed consecutive life sentences for two aggravated murder convictions involving the same victim.

2012“The award of $500 is not substantial in the sense that it is not a large amount, but it is substantial in the sense that it has actual value in excess of the $200 nominal damage award provided for in ORS 646.641(1) in the event of a violation of the act ” Id.

2009Id. at 489, 220 P.3d at 82 .

1986In the event that at that hearing the allegation of perjury or reckless disregard is established by a preponderance of the evidence, and, with the affidavit’s false material set to one side, the affidavit’s remaining content is insufficient to establish probable cause, the search warrant must be voided and the fruits of the search excluded to the same extent as if probable cause was lacking on the face of the affidavit.” 438 US at 155 .

1962For instance, in Oregon Worsted Co. v. State Tax Commission, 217 Or 104, 117 , 317 P2d 924 , 342 P2d 108 (1959), the court noted that in an appeal the circuit court may affirm, modify or remand, and went on to discuss the problem of burden of proof upon the remand.

1962For instance, in Oregon Worsted Co. v. State Tax Commission, 217 Or 104, 117 , 317 P2d 924 , 342 P2d 108 (1959), the court noted that in an appeal the circuit court may affirm, modify or remand, and went on to discuss the problem of burden of proof upon the remand.

1935In Elder v. Federal Insurance Co., 213 Mass. 389 ( 100 N. E. 655 ), the insurance policy “warranted that the automobile hereby insured” against loss or damage *50 by fire “shall not be nsed for carrying passengers during the term of this policy, and in the event of the violation of this warranty, this policy shall immediately become null and void”.

1935In Elder v. Federal Insurance Co., 213 Mass. 389 ( 100 N. E. 655 ), the insurance policy “warranted that the automobile hereby insured” against loss or damage *50 by fire “shall not be nsed for carrying passengers during the term of this policy, and in the event of the violation of this warranty, this policy shall immediately become null and void”.