Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rustin v. Smithgreen2 sentences2017Rustin v. Smith, 104 Md.App. 676, 680 , 657 A.2d 412 (1995). 2017Rustin v. Smith, 104 Md.App. 676, 680 , 657 A.2d 412 (1995). | 1 | 2 |
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Pittsgreen2 sentences2021In addition, “[t]he proven error must … be prejudicial, not harmless.” Id. 2021“Error will be found if the given instruction is not supported by evidence in the case.” CSX Transp., Inc. v. Pitts, 430 Md. 431, 458 (2013). | 1 | 1 |
Preston v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Our courts have interpreted this rule to require trial courts to give a party’s requested jury instruction when a three-part test is met: “The instruction must state correctly the law, the instruction must apply to the facts of the case (e.g., be generated by some evidence), and the content of the jury instruction must not be covered fairly in a given instruction.” Preston v. State, 444 Md. 67, 81-82 (2015) (internal citations and footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Nicholson v. Stategreen1 sentence2019The second prong is at issue in this case: whether the proponent of a jury instruction (here, the State) generated the instruction factually by adducing “some evidence.” See Nicholson v. State, 239 Md. App. 228, 239 (2018), cert. denied, 462 Md. 576 (2019). | 1 | 1 |
Roach v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). 2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Cost v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). 2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Dickey v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). 2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Derr v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). 2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Derr v. Marylandgreen2 sentences2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). 2015See Derr v. State, 434 Md. 88, 133 , 73 A.3d 254, 281 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2723 , 189 L.Ed.2d 762 (2014); Cost v. State, 417 Md. 360, 368-69 , 10 A.3d 184, 189 (2010); Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187, 197-98 , 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008); Roach v. State, 358 Md. 418, 428-29 , 749 A.2d 787, 792-93 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Theda v. Giesowgreen1 sentence1979App. at 709 , upon reviewing the federal cases, and particularly the Vreelandand Marino cases as discussed above, concluded: *297 Accord, International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 535 F. 2d 742, 748 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1014 , 98 S. Ct. 730 , 54 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978) (“the [trial] court may utilize its Rule 54 (b) powers with respect to a given claim only if all damages stemming from that claim have been fixed”); Cinerama, Inc. v. Sweet Music, S.A., 482 F. 2d 66, 69 (2d Cir. 1973); Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Giesow, 412 F. 2d 468, 470 (2d Cir. 1969); Henderson v. Hassur, 1 | 1 | 1 |
Cinerama, Inc., a New York Corporation v. Sweet Music, S.A., a Swiss Corporation, and Union Bank of Switzerland, a Swiss Corporationgreen1 sentence1979App. at 709 , upon reviewing the federal cases, and particularly the Vreelandand Marino cases as discussed above, concluded: *297 Accord, International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 535 F. 2d 742, 748 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1014 , 98 S. Ct. 730 , 54 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978) (“the [trial] court may utilize its Rule 54 (b) powers with respect to a given claim only if all damages stemming from that claim have been fixed”); Cinerama, Inc. v. Sweet Music, S.A., 482 F. 2d 66, 69 (2d Cir. 1973); Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Giesow, 412 F. 2d 468, 470 (2d Cir. 1969); Henderson v. Hassur, 1 | 1 | 1 |
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,552 International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.green1 sentence1979App. at 709 , upon reviewing the federal cases, and particularly the Vreelandand Marino cases as discussed above, concluded: *297 Accord, International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 535 F. 2d 742, 748 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1014 , 98 S. Ct. 730 , 54 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978) (“the [trial] court may utilize its Rule 54 (b) powers with respect to a given claim only if all damages stemming from that claim have been fixed”); Cinerama, Inc. v. Sweet Music, S.A., 482 F. 2d 66, 69 (2d Cir. 1973); Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Giesow, 412 F. 2d 468, 470 (2d Cir. 1969); Henderson v. Hassur, 1 | 1 | 1 |
Henderson v. Hassurgreen2 sentences1979App. at 709 , upon reviewing the federal cases, and particularly the Vreelandand Marino cases as discussed above, concluded: *297 Accord, International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 535 F. 2d 742, 748 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1014 , 98 S. Ct. 730 , 54 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978) (“the [trial] court may utilize its Rule 54 (b) powers with respect to a given claim only if all damages stemming from that claim have been fixed”); Cinerama, Inc. v. Sweet Music, S.A., 482 F. 2d 66, 69 (2d Cir. 1973); Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Giesow, 412 F. 2d 468, 470 (2d Cir. 1969); Henderson v. Hassur, 1 1979App. at 709 , upon reviewing the federal cases, and particularly the Vreelandand Marino cases as discussed above, concluded: *297 Accord, International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 535 F. 2d 742, 748 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1014 , 98 S. Ct. 730 , 54 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978) (“the [trial] court may utilize its Rule 54 (b) powers with respect to a given claim only if all damages stemming from that claim have been fixed”); Cinerama, Inc. v. Sweet Music, S.A., 482 F. 2d 66, 69 (2d Cir. 1973); Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Giesow, 412 F. 2d 468, 470 (2d Cir. 1969); Henderson v. Hassur, 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nicholson v. State
neutral
1 sentence2019The second prong is at issue in this case: whether the proponent of a jury instruction (here, the State) generated the instruction factually by adducing “some evidence.” See Nicholson v. State, 239 Md. App. 228, 239 (2018), cert. denied, 462 Md. 576 (2019). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Rotella v. Wood
green
2 sentences2017Kronisch v. United States , 150 F.3d 112 , 128 (2nd Cir. 1998), overruled on other grounds by Rotella v. Wood , 528 U.S. 549 , 120 S.Ct. 1075 [ 145 L.Ed.2d 1047 ] (2000)." Id. at 102. 2017Kronisch v. United States , 150 F.3d 112 , 128 (2nd Cir. 1998), overruled on other grounds by Rotella v. Wood , 528 U.S. 549 , 120 S.Ct. 1075 [ 145 L.Ed.2d 1047 ] (2000)." Id. at 102. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Kronisch v. United States
red
1 sentence2017Kronisch v. United States , 150 F.3d 112 , 128 (2nd Cir. 1998), overruled on other grounds by Rotella v. Wood , 528 U.S. 549 , 120 S.Ct. 1075 [ 145 L.Ed.2d 1047 ] (2000)." Id. at 102. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Medina v. California
green
2 sentences2015The question under due process thereby becomes whether a state’s given framework “ ‘offends some principle of justice so rooted in the *479 traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental/ or ‘transgressed any recognized principle of fundamental fairness in operation.’ ” Id. (quoting Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437, 446 , 112 S.Ct. 2572 , 120 L.Ed.2d 353 (1992)). 2015The question under due process thereby becomes whether a state’s given framework “ ‘offends some principle of justice so rooted in the *479 traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental/ or ‘transgressed any recognized principle of fundamental fairness in operation.’ ” Id. (quoting Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437, 446 , 112 S.Ct. 2572 , 120 L.Ed.2d 353 (1992)). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
green
1 sentence2015The question under due process thereby becomes whether a state’s given framework “ ‘offends some principle of justice so rooted in the *479 traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental/ or ‘transgressed any recognized principle of fundamental fairness in operation.’ ” Id. (quoting Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437, 446 , 112 S.Ct. 2572 , 120 L.Ed.2d 353 (1992)). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Thomas v. State
green
1 sentence2014Under that instruction, the jury could find Christian guilty of the weapons charges only if it found, beyond a reasonable doubt, not only that he “knowingly aided, counseled, commanded, or encouraged the commission of the crime[s],” but also that he “had the intent to make the crime[s] happen.” As the given instruction “fairly covered the law,” and is neither misleading nor confusing, see Thomas, 413 Md. at 257 , we will not disturb the judgment. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Bloodsworth v. State
green
2 sentences2010I see as simply a tool, and the checklist is ... provided to the jury so that they can essentially assess what ... the filter of the scientist would say about a given test. *405 Id. at 177-78 , 512 A.2d at 1062 . 2010I see as simply a tool, and the checklist is ... provided to the jury so that they can essentially assess what ... the filter of the scientist would say about a given test. *405 Id. at 177-78 , 512 A.2d at 1062 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Davis v. State
red
2 sentences2007Although Davis indicated that questions bearing on the satisfaction of the minimum statutory qualifications fell generally into the category of mandatory questions, the key inquiry was whether the given inquiry would be “reasonably likely to reveal cause for disqualification.” 333 Md. at 35-36 , 633 A.2d at 871 . 2007Although Davis indicated that questions bearing on the satisfaction of the minimum statutory qualifications fell generally into the category of mandatory questions, the key inquiry was whether the given inquiry would be “reasonably likely to reveal cause for disqualification.” 333 Md. at 35-36 , 633 A.2d at 871 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Boyd v. State
green
2 sentences2007Based on these distinctions, the Boyd Court opined that the defendants’ requested question regarding physical infirmities was not mandatory because it “would not be reasonably likely to lead to [discovery of] cause for disqualification of a juror.” 341 Md. at 440 , 671 A.2d at 37 . 2007Based on these distinctions, the Boyd Court opined that the defendants’ requested question regarding physical infirmities was not mandatory because it “would not be reasonably likely to lead to [discovery of] cause for disqualification of a juror.” 341 Md. at 440 , 671 A.2d at 37 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Francis v. Franklin
green
2 sentences2003As in Franklin , the challenged instruction was “cast in the language of command[.]” Id., 471 U.S. at 316 , 105 S.Ct. at 1972 . 2003As in Franklin , the challenged instruction was “cast in the language of command[.]” Id., 471 U.S. at 316 , 105 S.Ct. at 1972 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Hutchinson
green
2 sentences2000State v. Hutchinson, 287 Md. 198, 202 , 411 A.2d 1035 (1980). 2000State v. Hutchinson, 287 Md. 198, 202 , 411 A.2d 1035 (1980). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Vesco & Co. v. International Controls Corp.
green
2 sentences1979App. at 709 , upon reviewing the federal cases, and particularly the Vreelandand Marino cases as discussed above, concluded: *297 Accord, International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 535 F. 2d 742, 748 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1014 , 98 S. Ct. 730 , 54 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978) (“the [trial] court may utilize its Rule 54 (b) powers with respect to a given claim only if all damages stemming from that claim have been fixed”); Cinerama, Inc. v. Sweet Music, S.A., 482 F. 2d 66, 69 (2d Cir. 1973); Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Giesow, 412 F. 2d 468, 470 (2d Cir. 1969); Henderson v. Hassur, 1 1979App. at 709 , upon reviewing the federal cases, and particularly the Vreelandand Marino cases as discussed above, concluded: *297 Accord, International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 535 F. 2d 742, 748 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1014 , 98 S. Ct. 730 , 54 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978) (“the [trial] court may utilize its Rule 54 (b) powers with respect to a given claim only if all damages stemming from that claim have been fixed”); Cinerama, Inc. v. Sweet Music, S.A., 482 F. 2d 66, 69 (2d Cir. 1973); Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Giesow, 412 F. 2d 468, 470 (2d Cir. 1969); Henderson v. Hassur, 1 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.