Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1991–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2009See State v. Williams, 258 Conn. 1, 12 , 778 A.2d 186 (2001) (to establish possession of firearm for conviction under § 53a-217 by constructive possession, state required to prove beyond reasonable doubt defendant exercised intentional dominion and control over firearm and had knowledge of its character). 2009See State v. Williams, 258 Conn. 1, 12 , 778 A.2d 186 (2001) (to establish possession of firearm for conviction under § 53a-217 by constructive possession, state required to prove beyond reasonable doubt defendant exercised intentional dominion and control over firearm and had knowledge of its character). | 2 | 2 |
Kenneson v. Eggertgreen1 sentence2022See Kenneson v. Eggert, 196 Conn. App. 773, 785 , 230 A.3d 795 (2020) (comments made during settlement conference ‘‘were made during a judicial proceeding’’ and ‘‘relevant to the subject mat- ter of the ongoing litigation’’ such that litigation privi- lege blocked claim stemming therefrom); Bruno v. Travelers Cos., supra, 172 Conn. App. 727 (‘‘[i]t is well settled that communications uttered or published in the course of judicial proceedings are absolutely privi- leged [as] long as they are in some way pertinent to the subject of the controversy’’ (emphasis added; internal quotation marks omit | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Golding
green
2 sentences2017In Kitchens , we considered whether a defendant was entitled to appellate review of his claim of instructional error pursuant to *214 **809 State v. Golding , supra, 213 Conn. at 239 -40 , 567 A.2d 823 , 5 when defense counsel failed to object or correct the given instruction. 2017In Kitchens , we considered whether a defendant was entitled to appellate review of his claim of instructional error pursuant to *214 **809 State v. Golding , supra, 213 Conn. at 239 -40 , 567 A.2d 823 , 5 when defense counsel failed to object or correct the given instruction. | 2 | 2012–2017 |
Kaczynski v. Kaczynski
green
2 sentences2009Kaczynski v. Kaczynski, 109 Conn. App. 381, 390 , 951 A.2d 690 , cert. granted on other grounds, 289 Conn. 929 , 958 A.2d 158 (2008). 2009Kaczynski v. Kaczynski, 109 Conn.App. 381, 390 , 951 A.2d 690 , cert. granted on other grounds, 289 Conn. 929 , 958 A.2d 158 (2008). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences2009Kaczynski v. Kaczynski, 109 Conn. App. 381, 390 , 951 A.2d 690 , cert. granted on other grounds, 289 Conn. 929 , 958 A.2d 158 (2008). 2009Kaczynski v. Kaczynski, 109 Conn.App. 381, 390 , 951 A.2d 690 , cert. granted on other grounds, 289 Conn. 929 , 958 A.2d 158 (2008). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Kaczynski v. Kaczynski
green
2 sentences2009Kaczynski v. Kaczynski, 109 Conn.App. 381, 390 , 951 A.2d 690 , cert. granted on other grounds, 289 Conn. 929 , 958 A.2d 158 (2008). 2009Kaczynski v. Kaczynski, 109 Conn.App. 381, 390 , 951 A.2d 690 , cert. granted on other grounds, 289 Conn. 929 , 958 A.2d 158 (2008). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Kitchens
green
2 sentences2017State v. Kitchens , supra, 299 Conn. at 462 -63 , 10 A.3d 942 . 2017State v. Kitchens , supra, 299 Conn. at 462 -63 , 10 A.3d 942 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Department of Social Services
green
2 sentences2014It is adequate if it fairly and sufficiently apprises those who may be affected of the nature and character of the action proposed, so as to make possible intelligent preparation for participation in the hearing . . . .’’ (Citations omitted; internal quo- tation marks omitted.) Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Dept. of Social Services, 288 Conn. 790 , 823–24, 955 A.2d 15 (2008). ‘‘However, since [the] commission is not bound by strict pleading rules . . . a party may be apprised that a given claim is at issue by other means, such as the statements of parties at trial, the evidence they have 2014It is adequate if it fairly and sufficiently apprises those who may be affected of the nature and character of the action proposed, so as to make possible intelligent preparation for participation in the hearing . . . .’’ (Citations omitted; internal quo- tation marks omitted.) Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Dept. of Social Services, 288 Conn. 790 , 823–24, 955 A.2d 15 (2008). ‘‘However, since [the] commission is not bound by strict pleading rules . . . a party may be apprised that a given claim is at issue by other means, such as the statements of parties at trial, the evidence they have | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008In Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc., supra, 230 Conn. at 98 , 644 A.2d 325 , our Supreme Court explained that, when the parties to an appeal have not raised a given claim, only the plain error doctrine can bring that claim within our purview. 2008In Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc., supra, 230 Conn. at 98 , 644 A.2d 325 , our Supreme Court explained that, when the parties to an appeal have not raised a given claim, only the plain error doctrine can bring that claim within our purview. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gustafson
green
2 sentences1997In response to the sanctioned judge’s argument that the term “wilful” required a specific intent to violate a given rule, the Oregon court stated that “ignorance of the governing standards of conduct themselves no more excuses judges than those whom they judge.” Id., 660 . 1997A judge may be sanctioned for a wilful violation of one of the canons of judicial conduct if he intended to engage in the conduct for which he is sanctioned “whether or not [he] knows that he violates the rule.” Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Sheiman v. Lafayette Bank & Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1996Sheiman v. Lafayette Bank Trust Co., 4 Conn. App. 39 , 45-46 (1985). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Cohn v. Aetna Insurance
green
2 sentences1991Co., 213 Conn. 525, 528 , 569 A.2d 541 (1990). 1991Co., 213 Conn. 525, 528 , 569 A.2d 541 (1990). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.