12 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Malachy Glen Associates, Inc. v. Town of Chichestergreen2 sentences2011“Perhaps the only guiding rule on this factor is that any loss to the individual that is not outweighed by a gain to the general public is an injustice.” Malachy Glen Assocs. v. Town of Chichester, 155 N.H. 102, 109 (2007) (quotation and brackets omitted). 2009Substantial Justice “Perhaps the only guiding rule [as to the factor of ‘substantial justice’] is that any loss to the individual that is not outweighed by a gain to the general public is an injustice.” Malachy Glen Assocs., 155 N.H. at 109 (citation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Harborside Associates, L.P. v. Parade Residence Hotel, LLCgreen1 sentence2024“Perhaps the only guiding rule on this factor is that any loss to the individual that is not outweighed by a gain to the general public is an injustice.” Harborside Assocs., 162 N.H. at 515 (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Farrar v. City of Keenegreen2 sentences2017“Perhaps the only guiding rule [as to this factor] is that any loss to the individual that is not outweighed by a gain to the general public is an injustice.” Farrar v. City of Keene, 158 N.H. 684, 692 (2009) (quotation omitted). “[W]hether the proposed use is consistent with the area’s present use” is also a factor. 2017Id. | 1 | 1 |
Labrecque v. Town of Salemgreen1 sentence2007In Labrecque v. Town of Salem, 128 N.H. 455, 459 (1986), we also looked at whether the proposed development was consistent with the area’s present use. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lauriegreen1 sentence2002The guiding principle is, as the trial court noted, whether the rule set forth in Moran “adequately protects a defendant’s privilege against self-incrimination under [P]art I, [A]rticle 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution.” State v. Laurie, 135 N.H. 438, 442 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
Chapin v. School District Number Two in Winchestergreen1 sentence1998See Chapin and Wife v. School District, 35 N.H. 445, 451 (1857) (parties’ intention is controlling); cf. Div. of Labor Stand. | 1 | 1 |
Gilbert v. Desmaraisgreen2 sentences1987See, e.g., Gilbert v. Desmarais, 87 N.H. 150, 151-52, 175 A. 247, 248 (1934). 1987See, e.g., Gilbert v. Desmarais, 87 N.H. 150, 151-52, 175 A. 247, 248 (1934). | 1 | 1 |
City of Keene v. Gerry's Cash Market, Inc.green2 sentences1974We assume the ballot law commission is completely aware of the guiding principle expressed in Keene v. Gerry’s Cash Market, Inc., 113 N.H. 165, 168 , 304 A.2d 873, 875 (1973) as follows: “Statutes regulating the form of ballots are generally regarded as directory rather than mandatory. 1974We assume the ballot law commission is completely aware of the guiding principle expressed in Keene v. Gerry’s Cash Market, Inc., 113 N.H. 165, 168 , 304 A.2d 873, 875 (1973) as follows: “Statutes regulating the form of ballots are generally regarded as directory rather than mandatory. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Quentin H. White v. Brigitte Auger f/k/a Brigitte Gaudreau & a.
green
2 sentences2021Id. 2021Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Dendrite Intern., Inc. v. Doe No. 3
green
1 sentence2010Id. at 760-61 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Loughlin v. Firemen's Insurance
green
1 sentence1987If the theory in the second suit was unavailable under the writ used in the first suit, the plaintiff had no opportunity to litigate it there and so plaintiff was not barred by res judicata.” Id. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.