Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
23 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Matter of Marquardtgreen2 sentences1997Devenir Assoc. v. City of Phoenix, 169 Ariz. 500, 503 , 821 P.2d 161, 164 (1991). 1997Devenir Assoc. v. City of Phoenix, 169 Ariz. 500, 503 , 821 P.2d 161, 164 (1991). | 4 | 4 |
Bechtel v. Rose in and for Maricopa Countygreen2 sentences2003Act. 1 (2001); see Bechtel v. Rose, 150 Ariz. 68, 71 , 722 P.2d 236, 239 (1986) (“The guiding principle [of special action jurisdiction is] ... our obligation to see that essential justice is done.”). 2003Act. 1 (2001); see Bechtel v. Rose, 150 Ariz. 68, 71 , 722 P.2d 236, 239 (1986) (“The guiding principle [of special action jurisdiction is] ... our obligation to see that essential justice is done.”). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Andrew C.green2 sentences2020“The guiding principle is to make the victim whole, to the extent permitted by the statutory and constitutional scheme.” Id. at 369, ¶ 11 (internal quotation omitted). ¶11 This court reviews restitution orders for an abuse of discretion. 2016Id. at 368, ¶ 11, 160 P.3d at 689 . ¶5 At the restitution hearing, the State introduced into evidence a spreadsheet prepared by the Company listing the construction equipment Corey and the other two juveniles damaged. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Lewisgreen1 sentence2020See Lewis, 222 Ariz. at 323, ¶ 5 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re Ryan A.green2 sentences2007Ryan A., 202 Ariz. at 24, ¶ 20 , 39 P.3d at 548 . 2007Ryan A., 202 Ariz. at 24, ¶ 20 , 39 P.3d at 548 . | 1 | 1 |
Aitken v. Industrial Commissiongreen2 sentences2004Comm'n of Ariz., 183 Ariz. 387, 393 , 904 P.2d 456, 462 (1995) ("[I]n the context of efficiently and expeditiously providing compensation to injured workers, which is what the [workers' compensation] system is designed to do, fault remains no consideration."). ¶ 8 In order to receive compensatory benefits, a claimant must show both legal causation and medical causation. 2004Comm'n of Ariz., 183 Ariz. 387, 393 , 904 P.2d 456, 462 (1995) ("[I]n the context of efficiently and expeditiously providing compensation to injured workers, which is what the [workers' compensation] system is designed to do, fault remains no consideration."). ¶ 8 In order to receive compensatory benefits, a claimant must show both legal causation and medical causation. | 1 | 1 |
Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc.green2 sentences2004Thus, the guiding principle of the system "is a trade of tort rights for an expeditious, no-fault method by which an employee can receive compensation for accidental injuries sustained in work-related accidents." Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc., 194 Ariz. 448, 451, ¶ 11 , 984 P.2d 534, 537 (1999); Aitken v. Indus. 2004Thus, the guiding principle of the system "is a trade of tort rights for an expeditious, no-fault method by which an employee can receive compensation for accidental injuries sustained in work-related accidents." Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc., 194 Ariz. 448, 451, ¶ 11 , 984 P.2d 534, 537 (1999); Aitken v. Indus. | 1 | 1 |
Duquette v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences2003In addition, Montero presents a question that is one of statewide importance, Duquette v. Superior Court, 161 Ariz. 269, 271 , 778 P.2d 634, 636 (App.1989), and requires statutory interpretation. 2003In addition, Montero presents a question that is one of statewide importance, Duquette v. Superior Court, 161 Ariz. 269, 271 , 778 P.2d 634, 636 (App.1989), and requires statutory interpretation. | 1 | 1 |
Silver v. Rosegreen2 sentences1994See also Silver v. Rose, 135 Ariz. 339, 343 , 661 P.2d 189, 193 (App.1982) (void custody order appropriately challenged by special action even though order was ap-pealable); Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec. v. Superior Court, 173 Ariz. 26, 27 , 839 P.2d 446, 447 (App.1992) (special action from order allowing intervention in dependency action involved “novel question that should be determined without waiting the length of time necessary for civil appeals to be decided”). 1994See also Silver v. Rose, 135 Ariz. 339, 343 , 661 P.2d 189, 193 (App.1982) (void custody order appropriately challenged by special action even though order was ap-pealable); Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec. v. Superior Court, 173 Ariz. 26, 27 , 839 P.2d 446, 447 (App.1992) (special action from order allowing intervention in dependency action involved “novel question that should be determined without waiting the length of time necessary for civil appeals to be decided”). | 1 | 1 |
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1994See also Silver v. Rose, 135 Ariz. 339, 343 , 661 P.2d 189, 193 (App.1982) (void custody order appropriately challenged by special action even though order was ap-pealable); Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec. v. Superior Court, 173 Ariz. 26, 27 , 839 P.2d 446, 447 (App.1992) (special action from order allowing intervention in dependency action involved “novel question that should be determined without waiting the length of time necessary for civil appeals to be decided”). 1994See also Silver v. Rose, 135 Ariz. 339, 343 , 661 P.2d 189, 193 (App.1982) (void custody order appropriately challenged by special action even though order was ap-pealable); Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec. v. Superior Court, 173 Ariz. 26, 27 , 839 P.2d 446, 447 (App.1992) (special action from order allowing intervention in dependency action involved “novel question that should be determined without waiting the length of time necessary for civil appeals to be decided”). | 1 | 1 |
Weaver v. Weavergreen2 sentences1987As such, “the guiding principle is that every power exercised by a court in a divorce proceeding must find its source in the relevant statutory framework.” Id.; see also Weaver v. Weaver, 131 Ariz. 586 , 643 P.2d 499 (1982); Andrews v. Andrews, 126 Ariz. 55 , 612 P.2d 511 (App.1980). 1987As such, “the guiding principle is that every power exercised by a court in a divorce proceeding must find its source in the relevant statutory framework.” Id.; see also Weaver v. Weaver, 131 Ariz. 586 , 643 P.2d 499 (1982); Andrews v. Andrews, 126 Ariz. 55 , 612 P.2d 511 (App.1980). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Barnardgreen2 sentences1985State v. Barnard, 126 Ariz. 110, 112 , 612 P.2d 1073, 1075 (App.1980). 1985State v. Barnard, 126 Ariz. 110, 112 , 612 P.2d 1073, 1075 (App.1980). | 1 | 1 |
Appeal in Juvenile Action J-96695green2 sentences1985As Division One of the court has noted in construing the amended rule, “it is clear that community protection is now the guiding principle to be considered in transfer proceedings____” Appeal in Juvenile Action J-96695, 146 Ariz. 238, 245 , 705 P.2d 478, 485 (1985). 1985As Division One of the court has noted in construing the amended rule, “it is clear that community protection is now the guiding principle to be considered in transfer proceedings____” Appeal in Juvenile Action J-96695, 146 Ariz. 238, 245 , 705 P.2d 478, 485 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Superior Courtgreen1 sentence1970In State v. Superior Court, 103 Ariz. at 208 at 210, 439 P.2d 294 at 296 (1968), our Supreme Court stated: “We will consider any application to this Court which states sufficient facts to justify relief irrespective of its technical denomination. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Estate of Harbergreen1 sentence1969In re Estate of Harber, 99 Ariz. 323, 326 , 409 P.2d 31, 33 (1965). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Boozergreen2 sentences1964See also State v. Boozer, 80 Ariz. 8 , 291 P.2d 786 (1955); Note, 54 Colum.L.Rev. 946 (1954). 1964See also State v. Boozer, 80 Ariz. 8 , 291 P.2d 786 (1955); Note, 54 Colum.L.Rev. 946 (1954). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Merrymangreen2 sentences1964We have stated the guiding principle in this area as follows: “The general rule is that whether or not improper argument in a criminal case has influenced the verdict must be left to the sound discretion of the trial court on motion for a new trial. * * * If there has been no abuse of that discretion and it appears that substantial justice has been done the court will not reverse the judgment.” State v. Merryman, 79 Ariz. 73 , 74- 75, 283 P.2d 239, 241 (1955). 1964We have stated the guiding principle in this area as follows: “The general rule is that whether or not improper argument in a criminal case has influenced the verdict must be left to the sound discretion of the trial court on motion for a new trial. * * * If there has been no abuse of that discretion and it appears that substantial justice has been done the court will not reverse the judgment.” State v. Merryman, 79 Ariz. 73 , 74- 75, 283 P.2d 239, 241 (1955). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima
green
2 sentences1986The guiding principle must be our obligation to see that essential jus *72 tice is done.” 100 Ariz. at 172 , 412 P.2d at 466 . 1986The guiding principle must be our obligation to see that essential jus *72 tice is done.” 100 Ariz. at 172 , 412 P.2d at 466 . | 2 | 1967–1986 |
Swift Transportation v. Industrial Commission
green
1 sentence2025Accordingly, as in Swift, using the salary Douglas earned through a time she was earning less and working fewer hours “would grossly distort [her] ‘actual earning capacity.’” See id. at 12 ; Larson, § 93.01(1)(g) (explaining that unless future earning capacity is recognized as the guiding principle when dealing with wage calculation issues, “there may be a temptation to lapse into the fallacy of supposing that compensation theory is necessarily satisfied when a mechanical representation of th[e] claimant’s own earnings in some arbitrary past period has been used as a wage basis”). ¶14 Even so, | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2007The guiding presumption in civil cases is that opinions will operate retroactively, see Wilderness World, 182 Ariz. at 201 , 895 P.2d at 113 , and “[a]n honorable government would not keep taxes to which it is not entitled, and the legislative scheme supports that result.” Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Co., 161 Ariz. at 139 , 776 P.2d at 1065 . 2007The guiding presumption in civil cases is that opinions will operate retroactively, see Wilderness World, 182 Ariz. at 201 , 895 P.2d at 113 , and “[a]n honorable government would not keep taxes to which it is not entitled, and the legislative scheme supports that result.” Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Co., 161 Ariz. at 139 , 776 P.2d at 1065 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2007The guiding presumption in civil cases is that opinions will operate retroactively, see Wilderness World, 182 Ariz. at 201 , 895 P.2d at 113 , and “[a]n honorable government would not keep taxes to which it is not entitled, and the legislative scheme supports that result.” Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Co., 161 Ariz. at 139 , 776 P.2d at 1065 . 2007The guiding presumption in civil cases is that opinions will operate retroactively, see Wilderness World, 182 Ariz. at 201 , 895 P.2d at 113 , and “[a]n honorable government would not keep taxes to which it is not entitled, and the legislative scheme supports that result.” Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Co., 161 Ariz. at 139 , 776 P.2d at 1065 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Akers
green
1 sentence1993This general rule was a guiding principle in State v. Akers, 435 N.W.2d 332 (Iowa 1989). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Marriage of Andrews v. Andrews
green
2 sentences1987As such, “the guiding principle is that every power exercised by a court in a divorce proceeding must find its source in the relevant statutory framework.” Id.; see also Weaver v. Weaver, 131 Ariz. 586 , 643 P.2d 499 (1982); Andrews v. Andrews, 126 Ariz. 55 , 612 P.2d 511 (App.1980). 1987As such, “the guiding principle is that every power exercised by a court in a divorce proceeding must find its source in the relevant statutory framework.” Id.; see also Weaver v. Weaver, 131 Ariz. 586 , 643 P.2d 499 (1982); Andrews v. Andrews, 126 Ariz. 55 , 612 P.2d 511 (App.1980). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Sosso v. Sosso
green
2 sentences1986Since our courts were without inherent legal or equitable powers relating to divorce, the guiding principle is that every power exercised by a court in a divorce proceeding must find its source in the relevant statutory framework, “or it does not exist.” Baril v. Baril, 354 A.2d 392 (Me.1976); Sosso v. Sosso, 196 Neb. 242 , 242 N.W.2d 621 (1976). 1986Since our courts were without inherent legal or equitable powers relating to divorce, the guiding principle is that every power exercised by a court in a divorce proceeding must find its source in the relevant statutory framework, “or it does not exist.” Baril v. Baril, 354 A.2d 392 (Me.1976); Sosso v. Sosso, 196 Neb. 242 , 242 N.W.2d 621 (1976). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Baril v. Baril
green
1 sentence1986Since our courts were without inherent legal or equitable powers relating to divorce, the guiding principle is that every power exercised by a court in a divorce proceeding must find its source in the relevant statutory framework, “or it does not exist.” Baril v. Baril, 354 A.2d 392 (Me.1976); Sosso v. Sosso, 196 Neb. 242 , 242 N.W.2d 621 (1976). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima
green
2 sentences1970Genda v. Superior Court, 103 Ariz. 240 , 439 P.2d 811 (1968), citing Caruso repeats the guiding principle of essential justice. 1970Genda v. Superior Court, 103 Ariz. 240 , 439 P.2d 811 (1968), citing Caruso repeats the guiding principle of essential justice. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Staley v. Estate of Harber
green
1 sentence1969In re Estate of Harber, 99 Ariz. 323, 326 , 409 P.2d 31, 33 (1965). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Powell v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1968The guiding principle in relation to a review of the findings of a trial judge is well stated in the following quoted portion of Rule 52(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., namely: “Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of witnesses.” We recognize that our views in this regard were vacated by the Arizona Supreme Court in its decision in the review of our Powell opinion, 102 Ariz. 11 , 423 P.2d 348 (1967) , therein the Supreme Court stated: “The referee system was 1968The guiding principle in relation to a review of the findings of a trial judge is well stated in the following quoted portion of Rule 52(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., namely: “Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of witnesses.” We recognize that our views in this regard were vacated by the Arizona Supreme Court in its decision in the review of our Powell opinion, 102 Ariz. 11 , 423 P.2d 348 (1967) , therein the Supreme Court stated: “The referee system was | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.